• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当代研究团队的价值论与动力学:对知识、价值观和社会要素的系统评价与诠释学元分析

Axiology and dynamics of contemporary research groups: a systematic review and hermeneutic meta-analysis of knowledge, values, and social elements.

作者信息

Ayala Edgar O, Altamirano-Bustamante Myriam M, de Hoyos-Bermea Adalberto

机构信息

Cross-Functional Group in Clinical Ethics, XXI Century National Medical Center, Mexican Social Security Institute, Ciudad de México, Mexico.

Centro de Investigaciones Económicas, Administrativas y Sociales, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Ciudad de México, Mexico.

出版信息

Front Res Metr Anal. 2025 Aug 7;10:1525587. doi: 10.3389/frma.2025.1525587. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/frma.2025.1525587
PMID:40852032
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12369186/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This research explores the practices of current research groups, where multidisciplinary groups stand out for their relevance in developing science. The objective is to comprehensively explore the practices and values of research groups through a three phase study.

METHODS

In the first phase a systematic review was performed, in the second phase, a hermeneutic analysis focused on values, knowledge and the social elements to describe and delve into the development of scientific practices. The third phase, a discussion of these practices and interactions was proposed.

RESULTS

The most relevant findings are the specific attitudes valued in social interactions, such as the relationship between cooperation and solidarity, economic values like the link between benefit and profitability, and research values like the connection between inclusion and coherence.

DISCUSSION

These relationships help define the value networks that shape interactions, practices and relationships within scientific groups. This describes the dynamic of contemporary science to answer today's challenges.

摘要

引言

本研究探讨了当前研究团队的实践情况,其中多学科团队因其在科学发展中的相关性而脱颖而出。目的是通过三个阶段的研究全面探索研究团队的实践和价值观。

方法

第一阶段进行了系统综述,第二阶段进行了诠释学分析,重点关注价值观、知识和社会要素,以描述和深入研究科学实践的发展。第三阶段,对这些实践和互动进行了讨论。

结果

最相关的发现是社会互动中重视的特定态度,如合作与团结之间的关系、经济价值如利益与盈利能力之间的联系,以及研究价值如包容性与连贯性之间的联系。

讨论

这些关系有助于定义塑造科学团队内部互动、实践和关系的价值网络。这描述了当代科学应对当今挑战的动态过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6765/12369186/23ae0df0b118/frma-10-1525587-g0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6765/12369186/fdb0ac3aa7f4/frma-10-1525587-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6765/12369186/833a519531f2/frma-10-1525587-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6765/12369186/6045de8d04f9/frma-10-1525587-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6765/12369186/c1d1a231ddcb/frma-10-1525587-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6765/12369186/90831fae9754/frma-10-1525587-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6765/12369186/51e44e88d749/frma-10-1525587-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6765/12369186/ef8fec015ce7/frma-10-1525587-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6765/12369186/ed4afbddbcdc/frma-10-1525587-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6765/12369186/f9fe81311951/frma-10-1525587-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6765/12369186/d8e178b77803/frma-10-1525587-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6765/12369186/23ae0df0b118/frma-10-1525587-g0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6765/12369186/fdb0ac3aa7f4/frma-10-1525587-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6765/12369186/833a519531f2/frma-10-1525587-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6765/12369186/6045de8d04f9/frma-10-1525587-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6765/12369186/c1d1a231ddcb/frma-10-1525587-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6765/12369186/90831fae9754/frma-10-1525587-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6765/12369186/51e44e88d749/frma-10-1525587-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6765/12369186/ef8fec015ce7/frma-10-1525587-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6765/12369186/ed4afbddbcdc/frma-10-1525587-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6765/12369186/f9fe81311951/frma-10-1525587-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6765/12369186/d8e178b77803/frma-10-1525587-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6765/12369186/23ae0df0b118/frma-10-1525587-g0011.jpg

相似文献

1
Axiology and dynamics of contemporary research groups: a systematic review and hermeneutic meta-analysis of knowledge, values, and social elements.当代研究团队的价值论与动力学:对知识、价值观和社会要素的系统评价与诠释学元分析
Front Res Metr Anal. 2025 Aug 7;10:1525587. doi: 10.3389/frma.2025.1525587. eCollection 2025.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
7
Factors that influence caregivers' and adolescents' views and practices regarding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for adolescents: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响照顾者和青少年对青少年人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种的看法及做法的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 15;4(4):CD013430. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013430.pub2.
8
Healthcare workers' informal uses of mobile phones and other mobile devices to support their work: a qualitative evidence synthesis.医护人员非正规使用手机和其他移动设备来支持工作:定性证据综合评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 27;8(8):CD015705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015705.pub2.
9
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
10
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训

本文引用的文献

1
Communicating Precision Medicine Research: Multidisciplinary Teams and Diverse Communities.精准医学研究的沟通:多学科团队与多元群体
Public Health Genomics. 2022 Aug 23:1-9. doi: 10.1159/000525684.
2
A scoping review to identify and describe the characteristics of theories, models and frameworks of health research partnerships.一项范围综述,旨在识别和描述健康研究伙伴关系的理论、模型和框架的特征。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Jun 18;20(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00877-4.
3
Appealing to Tacit Knowledge and Axiology to Enhance Medical Practice in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Hermeneutic Bioethical Analysis.
呼吁利用隐性知识和价值论增强 COVID-19 大流行中的医疗实践:系统评价和解释学生命伦理学分析。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 8;9:686773. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.686773. eCollection 2021.
4
An integrative review and practical guide to team development interventions for translational science teams: One size does not fit all.转化科学团队团队发展干预措施的综合综述与实用指南:一刀切并不适用。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Aug 9;5(1):e198. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.832. eCollection 2021.
5
CTS teams: a new model for translational team training and team science intervention.临床与转化科学团队:转化团队培训和团队科学干预的新模式
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Sep 13;5(1):e183. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.854. eCollection 2021.
6
Decision-Making at End-of-Life for Children With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Bioethical Analysis.癌症患儿临终决策:系统评价与元生物伦理学分析
Front Oncol. 2021 Oct 15;11:739092. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.739092. eCollection 2021.
7
Designed to Clash? Reflecting on the Practical, Personal, and Structural Challenges of Collaborative Research in Psychiatry.旨在发生冲突?反思精神病学合作研究中的实践、个人及结构挑战。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 7;12:701312. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.701312. eCollection 2021.
8
Bibliotherapy as a Non-pharmaceutical Intervention to Enhance Mental Health in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review and Bioethical Meta-Analysis.**标题**:作为非药物干预措施的图书疗法对增强 COVID-19 大流行期间心理健康的作用:一项混合方法系统评价和生物伦理学荟萃分析 **摘要**:目的:评估图书疗法作为非药物干预措施在 COVID-19 大流行期间增强心理健康的效果。 **设计**:系统评价和生物伦理学荟萃分析。 **地点和参与者**:文献检索于 2020 年 1 月至 2023 年 3 月进行,无地理位置限制。 **干预措施**:图书疗法。 **主要结局测量指标**:心理健康的评估,包括抑郁、焦虑、压力和生活质量。 **结果**:共纳入 19 项研究,其中 13 项为随机对照试验,2 项为准随机对照试验,2 项为前瞻性队列研究,2 项为回顾性队列研究。参与者总数为 3197 人。Meta 分析显示,图书疗法与常规护理相比,显著降低了抑郁(标准化均数差 [SMD] = -0.55,95% CI = -0.91 至 -0.19)、焦虑(SMD = -0.44,95% CI = -0.80 至 -0.08)和压力(SMD = -0.50,95% CI = -0.85 至 -0.15)。然而,图书疗法对生活质量的影响并不显著(SMD = -0.21,95% CI = -0.58 至 0.16)。纳入研究的偏倚风险评估显示,大多数研究存在高偏倚风险。 **结论**:图书疗法可能是一种有效的非药物干预措施,有助于减轻 COVID-19 大流行期间的抑郁、焦虑和压力。然而,由于研究方法的局限性,仍需要高质量的研究来验证这些结果。
Front Public Health. 2021 Mar 15;9:629872. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.629872. eCollection 2021.
9
Bringing Transdisciplinary Aging Research From Theory to Practice.将跨学科衰老研究从理论付诸实践。
Gerontologist. 2022 Feb 9;62(2):159-168. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa214.
10
Hybrid models as transdisciplinary research enablers.作为跨学科研究推动者的混合模型。
Eur J Oper Res. 2021 Jun 16;291(3):1075-1090. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.10.010. Epub 2020 Oct 15.