Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Centre, The Netherlands.
Am J Hypertens. 2011 Feb;24(2):200-8. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2010.201. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
It remains unclear whether the impact of habitual physical activity (HPA) differs for central vs. peripheral arterial stiffness, both of which are detrimental to cardiovascular health. We investigated the associations of lifetime HPA of different intensities on brachial and femoral stiffness in young adults, and compared these with those previously obtained for the carotid artery in the same study population.
Prospectively measured data (eight repeated measures between ages 13 and 36 years) on HPAs, and other lifestyle and biological variables, were retrieved for 373 subjects in whom stiffness of the brachial and femoral, as well as the carotid, arteries was assessed at age 36 years. Generalized estimating equations were used to examine the differences in time spent in HPAs (min/week) across sex-specific tertiles of the brachial and femoral distensibility (DC) and compliance (CC) coefficients.
After adjustment for potential confounders, subjects in the highest (more compliant) vs. those in the lowest tertiles of the brachial and femoral CCs (less compliant) at age 36 years had spent on average more time in vigorous (+21.2 (95%CI:2.0; 40.4) and +24.4 (5.0; 43.8), respectively) but not in light-to-moderate HPAs throughout the longitudinal period. These differences were explained by 28 and 62%, respectively, by vigorous-HPA-related favorable impacts on other cardiovascular risk factors. No such associations were observed for the brachial and femoral DCs, however.
Lifetime vigorous, but not light-to-moderate, HPA is favorably associated with brachial and femoral compliance, but not DC. Altogether, these and our previous findings thus suggest generalized vigorous-HPA-related adaptations, although of different nature, throughout the arterial tree.
目前尚不清楚习惯性体力活动(HPA)对中心和外周动脉僵硬的影响是否不同,这两者都对心血管健康有害。我们研究了不同强度的终生 HPA 与年轻人肱动脉和股动脉僵硬的关系,并将这些关系与同一研究人群中颈动脉先前获得的关系进行了比较。
前瞻性测量了 373 名受试者的 HPA 以及其他生活方式和生物学变量的数据(在 13 岁至 36 岁之间重复测量了 8 次),并在这些受试者中评估了 36 岁时肱动脉和股动脉以及颈动脉的僵硬程度。使用广义估计方程来检查在肱动脉和股动脉顺应性(CC)和扩张性(DC)系数的性别特异性三分位数中,HPA 时间(每周分钟)的差异。
在调整了潜在混杂因素后,与 36 岁时肱动脉和股动脉 CC(顺应性较差)最低三分位相比,最高三分位(顺应性较好)的受试者平均花费更多时间进行剧烈(+21.2(95%CI:2.0;40.4)和+24.4(5.0;43.8),分别)但不是在整个纵向期间进行轻度至中度 HPA。这些差异分别由剧烈 HPA 相关的其他心血管危险因素的有利影响解释了 28%和 62%。然而,对于肱动脉和股动脉 DC,没有观察到这种关联。
终生剧烈但非轻度至中度 HPA 与肱动脉和股动脉顺应性呈正相关,但与 DC 无关。总之,这些发现和我们之前的发现表明,整个动脉系统都存在与剧烈 HPA 相关的适应性,尽管性质不同。