Lundquist Jennifer H, Massey Douglas S
Assistant Professor and Research Associate at the Social and Demographic Research Institute at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
J Lat Am Stud. 2005 Feb 1;37(1):29-53. doi: 10.1017/S0022216X04008594.
The issue of whether Central Americans in the United States are 'political' or 'economic' migrants has been widely debated, yet little empirical research has informed the controversy. Earlier studies have relied primarily on cross-sectional aggregate data. In order to overcome these limitations we draw on recent surveys conducted in five Nicaraguan communities by the Latin American Migration Project. Using retrospective data, we reconstruct a history of a family's migration to the United States and Costa Rica from the date of household formation to the survey date and link these data to national-level data on GDP and Contra War violence. While out migration to both Costa Rica and the United States is predicted by economic trends, US-bound migration was more strongly linked to the level of Contra War violence independent of economic motivations, especially in an interactive model that allows for a higher wartime effect of social networks. We conclude that elevated rates of Nicaraguan migration to the United States during the late 1980s and early 1990s were a direct result of the US-Contra intervention. The approach deployed here - which relates to the timing of migration decisions to macro-level country trends - enables us to address the issue of political versus economic motivations for migration with more precision than prior work.
在美国的中美洲人是“政治”移民还是“经济”移民这一问题一直备受广泛争论,但鲜有实证研究为这场争论提供依据。早期研究主要依赖横截面汇总数据。为克服这些局限性,我们借鉴了拉丁美洲移民项目近期在尼加拉瓜五个社区进行的调查。利用回顾性数据,我们重构了一个家庭从组建家庭之日到调查日期向美国和哥斯达黎加移民的历史,并将这些数据与国内生产总值和反政府战争暴力的国家级数据相联系。虽然向哥斯达黎加和美国的移民都受经济趋势预测,但前往美国的移民与反政府战争暴力程度的联系更为紧密,且独立于经济动机,尤其是在一个考虑到社会网络战时影响更大的交互模型中。我们得出结论,20世纪80年代末和90年代初尼加拉瓜向美国移民率的上升是美国-反政府武装干预的直接结果。这里采用的方法——将移民决策的时间与宏观层面的国家趋势联系起来——使我们能够比以往研究更精确地解决移民的政治动机与经济动机问题。