Suppr超能文献

野生猩猩的饮食传统。

Diet traditions in wild orangutans.

机构信息

Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0383, USA.

出版信息

Am J Phys Anthropol. 2010 Oct;143(2):175-87. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.21304.

Abstract

This study explores diet differences between two populations of wild Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii) to assess whether a signal of social learning can be detected in the observed patterns. The populations live in close proximity and in similar habitats but are separated by a river barrier that is impassable to orangutans in the study region. We found a 60% between-site difference in diet at the level of plant food items (plant species-organ combinations). We also found that individuals at the same site were more likely to eat the same food items than expected by chance. These results suggest the presence of diet (food selection) traditions. Detailed tests of three predictions of three models of diet acquisition allowed us to reject a model based on exclusive social learning but could not clearly distinguish between the remaining two models: one positing individual exploration and learning of food item selection and the other one positing preferential social learning followed by individual fine tuning. We know that maturing orangutans acquire their initial diet through social learning and then supplement it by years of low-level, individual sampling. We, therefore, conclude that the preferential social learning model produces the best fit to the geographic patterns observed in this study. However, the very same taxa that socially acquire their diets as infants and show evidence for innovation-based traditions in the wild paradoxically may have diets that are not easily distinguished from those acquired exclusively through individual learning.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨两种野生婆罗洲猩猩(Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii)群体之间的饮食差异,以评估在观察到的模式中是否可以检测到社会学习的信号。这两个群体生活在相近的栖息地,但被一条河流隔开,在研究区域内猩猩无法通过这条河流。我们发现,在植物食物项目(植物物种-器官组合)的水平上,两个地点之间存在 60%的饮食差异。我们还发现,同一地点的个体更有可能食用相同的食物,这超出了随机预期。这些结果表明存在饮食(食物选择)传统。对三种饮食获取模型的三个预测的详细测试使我们能够拒绝基于排他性社会学习的模型,但不能明确区分其余两种模型:一种假设个体对食物项目选择的探索和学习,另一种假设优先的社会学习,然后是个体的微调。我们知道,成熟的猩猩通过社会学习获得最初的饮食,然后通过多年的低水平个体抽样来补充。因此,我们得出结论,偏好的社会学习模型最符合本研究中观察到的地理模式。然而,非常有趣的是,那些在婴儿期通过社会学习获得饮食的同一类群,在野外表现出基于创新的传统的证据,它们的饮食可能与那些通过个体学习获得的饮食难以区分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验