Mahon Andy, Holt Caitlin, Hibbert Matthew, Jago Russell, Tinner Laura, Kidger Judi
Centre for Public Health, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Clifton, Bristol, BS8 2PL UK.
Somerset Council Public Health, County Hall, Taunton, Somerset, TA1 4DY UK.
Discov Public Health. 2025;22(1):538. doi: 10.1186/s12982-025-00933-8. Epub 2025 Sep 12.
The mental health of young people is a growing public health concern. While physical activity has both physical and mental health benefits, there is limited evidence on physical activity interventions to improve the mental health of young people aged 16 to 25. We aimed to scope the types and design of physical activity interventions in educational settings that target mental health outcomes for this group.
A systematic search was conducted for articles published from 2015 to January 2025. References were screened and included for data extraction if they reported the effects of a physical activity-based intervention on mental health-related outcomes in students aged 16 to 25 in high income countries. Findings were reported according to PRISMA extension for scoping reviews.
A total of 22,437 records were identified and 51 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most were conducted in the USA ( = 16); just one study was conducted in the UK. Most were conducted in post-secondary settings like universities ( = 39) with less focus on older adolescents in upper secondary education ( = 12). Twenty studies were either RCTs or cluster-RCTs. Aerobic exercise ( = 26) and yoga ( = 15) were the most common physical activity interventions. Beneficial effects of the physical activity-based interventions were reported for the majority of the twenty-eight mental health outcomes assessed, notably depressive symptoms, anxiety and stress.
There was considerable heterogeneity in design of interventions, components used and how mental health was measured. There was a lack of evidence on inequalities in outcomes including differences by gender or socioeconomic position. The evidence examined in this review suggests physical activity-based interventions within education settings could be an effective and feasible option to support a range of mental health outcomes in students aged 16 to 25. However, several under-researched areas were identified, including a need for more well-designed, high-quality studies to examine the mental health effects of physical activity interventions within older adolescent students, and examining the differences between genders and sub-groups of young people such as those from lower SES backgrounds or with learning or physical disabilities.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12982-025-00933-8.
年轻人的心理健康日益成为公共卫生关注的焦点。虽然体育活动对身心健康都有益处,但关于体育活动干预措施对16至25岁年轻人心理健康的影响,证据有限。我们旨在梳理针对该群体心理健康结果的教育环境中体育活动干预措施的类型和设计。
对2015年至2025年1月发表的文章进行系统检索。如果参考文献报告了高收入国家16至25岁学生基于体育活动的干预对心理健康相关结果的影响,则对其进行筛选并纳入数据提取。研究结果根据PRISMA扩展报告进行范围综述。
共识别出22437条记录,51项研究符合纳入标准。大多数研究在美国进行(n = 16);只有一项研究在英国进行。大多数研究在大学等高等教育环境中进行(n = 39),较少关注高中阶段的大龄青少年(n = 12)。20项研究为随机对照试验(RCT)或整群随机对照试验(cluster-RCT)。有氧运动(n = 26)和瑜伽(n = 15)是最常见的体育活动干预措施。在所评估的28项心理健康结果中,大多数报告了基于体育活动的干预措施的有益效果,尤其是抑郁症状、焦虑和压力。
干预措施的设计、所使用的组成部分以及心理健康的测量方式存在相当大的异质性。缺乏关于结果不平等的证据,包括性别或社会经济地位差异。本综述中审查的证据表明,教育环境中基于体育活动的干预措施可能是支持16至25岁学生一系列心理健康结果的有效且可行的选择。然而,确定了几个研究不足的领域,包括需要更多精心设计、高质量的研究来检验体育活动干预措施对大龄青少年学生心理健康的影响,以及研究不同性别和年轻人群体(如社会经济地位较低背景或有学习或身体残疾的人群)之间的差异。
在线版本包含可在10.1186/s12982-025-00933-8获取的补充材料。