LSE Health, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Nov;71(10):1739-48. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.08.001. Epub 2010 Aug 26.
Ensuring high quality intrapartum care in developing countries is a crucial component of efforts to reduce maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity. Conceptual frameworks for understanding quality of care have broadened to reflect the complexity of factors affecting quality of health care provision. Yet, the role of social sciences within the assessment and understanding of quality of care in this field has focused primarily on seeking to understand the views and experiences of service users and providers. In this pilot study we aimed to combine clinical and social science perspectives and methods to best assess and understand issues affecting quality of clinical care and to identify priorities for change. Based in one referral hospital in Ethiopia, data collection took place in three phases using a combination of structured and unstructured observations, interviews and a modified nominal group process. This resulted in a thorough and pragmatic methodology. Our results showed high levels of knowledge and compliance with most aspects of good clinical practice, and non-compliance was affected by different, inter-linked, resource constraints. Considering possible changes in terms of resource implications, local stakeholders prioritised five areas for change. Some of these changes would have considerable resources implications whilst others could be made within existing resources. The discussion focuses on implications for informing quality improvement interventions. Improvements will need to address health systems issues, such as supply of key drugs, as well as changes in professional practice to promote the rational use of drugs. Furthermore, the study considers the need to understand broader organizational factors and inter-professional relationships. The potential for greater integration of social science perspectives as part of currently increasing monitoring and evaluation activity around intrapartum care is highlighted.
确保发展中国家提供高质量的产时护理是降低孕产妇和新生儿死亡率和发病率努力的重要组成部分。用于理解护理质量的概念框架已经扩大,以反映影响医疗保健质量提供的因素的复杂性。然而,社会科学在该领域评估和理解护理质量中的作用主要集中在试图理解服务使用者和提供者的观点和经验上。在这项试点研究中,我们旨在结合临床和社会科学的观点和方法,以最佳评估和理解影响临床护理质量的问题,并确定优先考虑的变革领域。该研究以埃塞俄比亚的一家转诊医院为基础,使用结构和非结构化观察、访谈和改良名义群体过程相结合的方式,分三个阶段进行数据收集。这导致了一种全面而务实的方法。我们的研究结果表明,大多数方面都具有较高的知识水平和良好的临床实践合规性,而不合规是由不同的、相互关联的资源限制造成的。在考虑可能会对资源产生影响的情况下,当地利益相关者将五个变革领域列为优先事项。其中一些变革将需要大量资源,而另一些则可以在现有资源范围内进行。讨论重点是为改进干预措施提供信息的影响。改进将需要解决卫生系统问题,如关键药物的供应,以及改变专业实践以促进合理使用药物。此外,该研究还考虑了需要理解更广泛的组织因素和专业间关系。强调了将社会科学观点更充分地纳入当前不断增加的产时护理监测和评估活动的潜力。