• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 PSA 时代观察等待局限性前列腺癌:干预的触发因素是什么?

Watchful waiting for localized prostate cancer in the PSA era: what have been the triggers for intervention?

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2011 May;107(10):1582-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09652.x. Epub 2010 Sep 22.

DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09652.x
PMID:20860650
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3082632/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

• To report outcomes for patients with localized prostate cancer managed using a watchful waiting strategy at an American centre and to explore factors that have triggered intervention.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• From 1991 to 2005, 218 patients diagnosed with untreated localized prostate cancer were followed at Massachusetts General Hospital with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) monitoring and digital rectal examination (DRE). Re-biopsies were performed in 95 of the patients. • The median follow-up was 6.3 years. Clinical outcomes and features predicting intervention were examined.

RESULTS

• At diagnosis, the median PSA level was 5.4 ng/mL. The Gleason score (GS) distribution was as follows: 95% with GS 6, 4% with GS 7, 1% with GS 8. The clinical T-stage distribution was as follows: 6% with T1a-b, 84% with T1c, 10% with T2. The median age was 71 years. • At 10 years, the overall survival was 79%, the cause-specific survival was 100%, the rate of distant metastasis was 5%, the rate of salvage androgen deprivation therapy was 15% and the rate of freedom from intervention (FFI) was 70%. • There was a PSA velocity of ≥ 2 ng/mL per year in 16% of patients, and a PSA doubling time of ≤ 3 years in 15% of patients. • Among the 95 re-biopsied men, the GS increased (grade progression) in 25% and the percentage of positive cores increased (volume progression) in 33%. • On multivariate analysis, only PSA doubling time and volume progression were independent predictors of FFI.

CONCLUSIONS

• In the present series, watchful waiting was associated with low rates of intervention and cancer progression. • As PSA doubling time and volume progression were the main triggers for intervention, these will be incorporated into the centre's current active surveillance protocol.

摘要

目的

报告在美国一家中心采用观察等待策略治疗局限性前列腺癌患者的结果,并探讨触发干预的因素。

患者和方法

1991 年至 2005 年,218 名未接受治疗的局限性前列腺癌患者在马萨诸塞州综合医院接受前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)监测和数字直肠检查(DRE)随访。95 名患者接受了再活检。中位随访时间为 6.3 年。检查了临床结果和预测干预的特征。

结果

诊断时,中位 PSA 水平为 5.4ng/ml。Gleason 评分(GS)分布如下:95%为 GS 6,4%为 GS 7,1%为 GS 8。临床 T 分期分布如下:6%为 T1a-b,84%为 T1c,10%为 T2。中位年龄为 71 岁。10 年时,总生存率为 79%,特异性生存率为 100%,远处转移率为 5%,挽救性去势治疗率为 15%,无干预生存率(FFI)为 70%。16%的患者 PSA 速度≥2ng/ml/年,15%的患者 PSA 倍增时间≤3 年。95 名再次活检的男性中,25%的 GS 升高(分级进展),33%的阳性核心比例增加(体积进展)。多变量分析显示,只有 PSA 倍增时间和体积进展是 FFI 的独立预测因素。

结论

在本系列中,观察等待与低干预率和癌症进展相关。由于 PSA 倍增时间和体积进展是干预的主要触发因素,这些因素将被纳入该中心当前的主动监测方案。

相似文献

1
Watchful waiting for localized prostate cancer in the PSA era: what have been the triggers for intervention?在 PSA 时代观察等待局限性前列腺癌:干预的触发因素是什么?
BJU Int. 2011 May;107(10):1582-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09652.x. Epub 2010 Sep 22.
2
Outcomes of active surveillance for Japanese patients with prostate cancer (PRIAS-JAPAN).日本前列腺癌患者主动监测的结果(PRIAS-JAPAN)。
BJU Int. 2024 Oct;134(4):652-658. doi: 10.1111/bju.16436. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
3
Feasibility study: watchful waiting for localized low to intermediate grade prostate carcinoma with selective delayed intervention based on prostate specific antigen, histological and/or clinical progression.可行性研究:对局限性低至中度前列腺癌进行观察等待,并根据前列腺特异性抗原、组织学和/或临床进展进行选择性延迟干预。
J Urol. 2002 Apr;167(4):1664-9.
4
Active surveillance strategy for patients with localised prostate cancer: criteria for progression.局限性前列腺癌患者的主动监测策略:进展标准
Dan Med J. 2015 Feb;62(2).
5
Compliance Rates with the Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance (PRIAS) Protocol and Disease Reclassification in Noncompliers.符合前列腺癌研究国际主动监测(PRIAS)方案的比例和不遵守方案者的疾病再分类。
Eur Urol. 2015 Nov;68(5):814-21. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.012. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
6
Population-based study of grade progression in patients who harboured Gleason 3 + 3.基于人群的研究显示,存在 Gleason 3+3 的患者出现分级进展。
World J Urol. 2017 Nov;35(11):1689-1699. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2047-z. Epub 2017 May 12.
7
Impact of pretreatment factors, biopsy Gleason grade volume indices and post-treatment nadir PSA on overall survival in patients with metastatic prostate cancer treated with step-up hormonal therapy.在接受逐步激素治疗的转移性前列腺癌患者中,预处理因素、活检 Gleason 分级体积指数和治疗后 PSA 最低值对总生存的影响。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2012 Mar;15(1):75-86. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2011.47. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
8
A Decade of Active Surveillance in the PRIAS Study: An Update and Evaluation of the Criteria Used to Recommend a Switch to Active Treatment.PRIAS 研究中的十年主动监测:更新和评估推荐转为主动治疗的标准。
Eur Urol. 2016 Dec;70(6):954-960. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Jun 19.
9
Predictors of pathological progression among men with localized prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance: a sub-analysis of the REDEEM study.接受主动监测的局限性前列腺癌男性患者发生病理性进展的预测因素:REDEEM 研究的一项亚分析。
J Urol. 2013 Dec;190(6):2039-45. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.06.051. Epub 2013 Jun 29.
10
Stage T1-2 prostate cancer: a multivariate analysis of factors affecting biochemical and clinical failures after radical prostatectomy.T1-2期前列腺癌:根治性前列腺切除术后影响生化及临床失败因素的多变量分析
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997 Mar 15;37(5):1043-52. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(96)00590-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Outcomes from Dose-Reduced Radiotherapy to the Prostate in Elderly Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer.老年局限性前列腺癌患者前列腺放疗剂量降低后的临床结局
Curr Oncol. 2021 Sep 26;28(5):3729-3737. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28050318.
2
Comparative pathology of dog and human prostate cancer.犬与人前列腺癌的比较病理学。
Vet Med Sci. 2022 Jan;8(1):110-120. doi: 10.1002/vms3.642. Epub 2021 Oct 10.
3
High-level expression of protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor 12 is a strong and independent predictor of poor prognosis in prostate cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Time trends and local variation in primary treatment of localized prostate cancer.局限性前列腺癌的主要治疗方法的时间趋势和局部变化。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1117-23. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.0133. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
2
Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer.局限性前列腺癌大样本主动监测队列长期随访的临床结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 1;28(1):126-31. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.2180. Epub 2009 Nov 16.
3
Anxiety and distress during active surveillance for early prostate cancer.
蛋白酪氨酸磷酸酶非受体 12 的高水平表达是前列腺癌预后不良的一个强有力且独立的预测因子。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Oct 12;19(1):944. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6182-3.
4
Outcomes of clinically localized prostate cancer patients managed with initial monitoring approach versus upfront local treatment: a North American population-based study.北美人群为基础的研究:采用初始监测方法与直接局部治疗处理局限性前列腺癌患者的临床结局。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2019 Dec;21(12):1673-1679. doi: 10.1007/s12094-019-02098-8. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
5
Clinical and pathologic factors predicting reclassification in active surveillance cohorts.预测主动监测队列中再分类的临床和病理因素。
Int Braz J Urol. 2018 Mar-Apr;44(3):440-451. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0320.
6
Current Management Strategy for Active Surveillance in Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌主动监测的当前管理策略
Curr Oncol Rep. 2017 Feb;19(2):11. doi: 10.1007/s11912-017-0569-6.
7
Overall rate, location, and predictive factors for positive surgical margins after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.高危前列腺癌机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性的总体发生率、位置及预测因素
Asian J Androl. 2016 Jan-Feb;18(1):123-8. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.148723.
8
Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer.根治性前列腺切除术与观察等待治疗局限性前列腺癌的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 19;367(3):203-13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113162.
9
Assessing prostate cancer growth with citrate measured by intact tissue proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy.应用完整组织质子磁共振波谱测量柠檬酸评估前列腺癌生长。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2012 Sep;15(3):278-82. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2011.70. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
10
Prostate cancer: treatment triggers for patients on active surveillance.前列腺癌:主动监测患者的治疗触发因素
Nat Rev Urol. 2011 Mar;8(3):126-7. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2010.235. Epub 2011 Jan 18.
早期前列腺癌主动监测期间的焦虑和痛苦
Cancer. 2009 Sep 1;115(17):3868-78. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24446.
4
Patients' survival expectations before localized prostate cancer treatment by treatment status.根据治疗状态,局部前列腺癌治疗前患者的生存期望。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2009 May-Jun;22(3):247-56. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.03.080200.
5
Active surveillance for favorable risk prostate cancer: what are the results, and how safe is it?对低危前列腺癌进行主动监测:结果如何,安全性如何?
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2008 Jan;18(1):2-6. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2007.09.001.
6
Clinicians are poor raters of life-expectancy before radical prostatectomy or definitive radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.在对局限性前列腺癌进行根治性前列腺切除术或确定性放疗之前,临床医生对预期寿命的评估能力较差。
BJU Int. 2007 Dec;100(6):1254-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07130.x.
7
Does active surveillance for men with localized prostate cancer carry psychological morbidity?对局限性前列腺癌男性患者进行主动监测是否会带来心理疾病?
BJU Int. 2007 Sep;100(3):540-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07009.x. Epub 2007 Jun 5.
8
Modeling prostate specific antigen kinetics in patients on active surveillance.对接受主动监测的患者的前列腺特异性抗原动力学进行建模。
J Urol. 2006 Oct;176(4 Pt 1):1392-7; discussion 1397-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.06.103.
9
20-year outcomes following conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer.临床局限性前列腺癌保守治疗后的20年随访结果
JAMA. 2005 May 4;293(17):2095-101. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.17.2095.
10
Early outcomes of active surveillance for localized prostate cancer.局限性前列腺癌主动监测的早期结果
BJU Int. 2005 May;95(7):956-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05446.x.