Duke University Medical Center, Box 3416, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010 Oct;18 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S35-52. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.04.015.
This review focuses on the criteria for assessing osteoarthritis (OA) in the guinea pig at the macroscopic and microscopic levels, and recommends particular assessment criteria to assist standardization in the conduct and reporting of preclinical trails in guinea pig models of OA.
A review was conducted of all OA studies from 1958 until the present that utilized the guinea pig. The PubMed database was originally searched August 1, 2006 using the following search terms: guinea pig and OA. We continued to check the database periodically throughout the process of preparing this chapter and the final search was conducted January 7, 2009. Additional studies were found in a review of abstracts from the OsteoArthritis Research Society International (OARSI) conferences, Orthopaedic Research Society (ORS) conferences, and literature related to histology in other preclinical models of OA reviewed for relevant references. Studies that described or used systems for guinea pig joint scoring on a macroscopic, microscopic, or ultrastructural basis were included in the final comprehensive summary and review. General recommendations regarding methods of OA assessment in the guinea pig were derived on the basis of a comparison across studies and an inter-rater reliability assessment of the recommended scoring system.
A histochemical-histological scoring system (based on one first introduced by H. Mankin) is recommended for semi-quantitative histological assessment of OA in the guinea pig, due to its already widespread adoption, ease of use, similarity to scoring systems used for OA in humans, its achievable high inter-rater reliability, and its demonstrated correlation with synovial fluid biomarker concentrations. Specific recommendations are also provided for histological scoring of synovitis and scoring of macroscopic lesions of OA.
As summarized herein, a wealth of tools exist to aid both in the semi-quantitative and quantitative assessment of OA in the guinea pig and provide a means of comprehensively characterizing the whole joint organ. In an ongoing effort at standardization, we recommend specific criteria for assessing the guinea pig model of OA as part of an OARSI initiative, termed herein the OARSI-HISTOgp recommendations.
本综述聚焦于评估豚鼠宏观和微观水平骨关节炎(OA)的标准,并推荐特定的评估标准,以协助豚鼠 OA 模型的临床前试验的进行和报告标准化。
对 1958 年至目前所有使用豚鼠的 OA 研究进行了综述。2006 年 8 月 1 日,我们最初使用以下搜索词在 PubMed 数据库中进行了搜索:豚鼠和 OA。在准备这一章的过程中,我们不断定期检查数据库,最后一次搜索是在 2009 年 1 月 7 日进行的。在审查有关 OA 其他临床前模型的组织学的骨关节炎研究协会国际(OARSI)会议、矫形研究学会(ORS)会议的摘要和文献时,还发现了其他研究。描述或使用豚鼠关节宏观、微观或超微结构关节评分系统的研究被纳入最终的综合总结和综述中。根据跨研究比较和推荐评分系统的组内可靠性评估,得出了豚鼠 OA 评估方法的一般建议。
由于其广泛采用、易于使用、与人类 OA 评分系统相似、可实现高组内可靠性以及与滑液生物标志物浓度的相关性,建议使用基于 H. Mankin 首次提出的组织化学-组织学评分系统,对豚鼠 OA 进行半定量组织学评估。还提供了用于滑膜炎和 OA 宏观病变评分的组织学评分的具体建议。
如本文所述,有大量工具可用于辅助豚鼠 OA 的半定量和定量评估,并提供全面描述整个关节器官的方法。在标准化的持续努力中,我们建议使用特定的标准来评估 OA 豚鼠模型,作为 OARSI 倡议的一部分,我们在此将其称为 OARSI-HISTOgp 建议。