Neugebauer E A M, Icks A, Schrappe M
IFOM-Institut für Forschung in der Operativen Medizin der Universität Witten/Herdecke, Fakultät für Medizin, Witten/Herdecke gGmbh, Ostmerheimer Straße 200, Köln.
Gesundheitswesen. 2010 Oct;72(10):739-48. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1262858. Epub 2010 Sep 23.
The methodical quality of health services research studies is often subject to criticism. Common standards in the field of health services research have been lacking so far. Hence, the German Network for Health Services Research [Deutsches Netzwerk Versorgungsforschung e. V. (DNVF e. V.)] decided to contribute to an improvement of this situation. The DNVF e. V. has already published part 1 of the Memorandum III"Methods for Health Services Research" for the 3 subject areas "Epidemiological Methods for Health Services Research", "Methods for Organisational Health Services Research" and "Methods for Quality of Life Research". The herewith published Part 2 of the Memorandum extends the spectrum by describing the methodological principles and minimum standards of "Methods of Health Economic Evaluations" and "Registries for Health Services Research". On 30 (th) August 2010, the member societies, mentioned as authors, approved this second part of the Memorandum III. 2 in-depth publications focussing on the 2 mentioned topics will be published in the next issues of this journal. This memorandum is intended for health services researchers who are planning, conducting and publishing studies as well as for reviewers who evaluate research proposals and publications on health services research studies. In accord with the expected advances in knowledge in health services research, it is planned to update the 2 parts of Memorandum III at appropriate intervals and to publish further parts from the huge spectrum of methods relevant to this field in the near future. Thus, the Memorandum has to be considered as work in progress.
卫生服务研究的系统性往往受到批评。到目前为止,卫生服务研究领域一直缺乏通用标准。因此,德国卫生服务研究网络[德国卫生服务研究网络(DNVF e.V.)]决定为改善这种状况做出贡献。德国卫生服务研究网络(DNVF e.V.)已经发布了《备忘录III:卫生服务研究方法》第1部分,涉及“卫生服务研究的流行病学方法”、“组织卫生服务研究方法”和“生活质量研究方法”这3个主题领域。随文发布的《备忘录》第2部分通过描述“卫生经济评估方法”和“卫生服务研究登记处”的方法学原则和最低标准,扩展了范围。2010年8月30日,作为作者提及的成员协会批准了《备忘录III》的这第二部分。聚焦上述两个主题的2篇深度文章将在本期刊的后续期次发表。本备忘录面向正在规划、开展和发表研究的卫生服务研究人员,以及评估卫生服务研究提案和出版物的评审人员。根据卫生服务研究领域知识的预期进展,计划定期更新《备忘录III》的这两部分,并在不久的将来发表更多与该领域相关的大量方法的其他部分。因此,本备忘录应被视为一项正在进行的工作。