Suppr超能文献

[卫生服务研究中生活质量评估——概念、方法和结构前提条件]

[Assessment of quality of life in health services research - conceptual, methodological and structural prerequisites].

作者信息

Koller M, Neugebauer E A M, Augustin M, Büssing A, Farin E, Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Lorenz W, Münch K, Petersen-Ewert C, Steinbüchel N von, Wieseler B

机构信息

Zentrum für Klinische Studien, Universitätsklinikum, Regensburg.

出版信息

Gesundheitswesen. 2009 Dec;71(12):864-72. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1239516. Epub 2009 Oct 5.

Abstract

On July 1, 2009, the German Network for Health Services Research [Deutsches Netzwerk Versorgungsforschung e. V. (DNVF e. V.)] approved the Memorandum III "Methods for Health Services Research", supported by the member societies mentioned as authors and published in this Journal [Gesundheitswesen 2009; 71: 505-510]. This is an in-depth publication on "quality-of-life assessment in health services research". Within the context of the health sciences, quality of life (QL) encompasses the subjective well-being and functioning in the physical, psychological and social domains. QL informs about the aspects of health care that "actually get to the patient". QL is what patients primarily experience, what they talk about and what to a large degree affects the acceptance of health-care services and processes in the society. Therefore, QL can be considered as a highly important endpoint within health services research. The importance of the construct quality of life is also emphasised in German treaties on social law and utility analyses. This paper is the first account on the relations between health services research and the concept and assessment of QL. Our working group has specified key criteria for QL assessment within studies on health services research. (1) Assessment instruments need to comply with standard quality criteria (reliability, validity, sensitivity, interpretability) and the decision for a particular instrument has to be reasonably justified. (2) Study design and study population have to match with the scientific research question and the sample size has to be biometrically sound. (3) QL assessment including time points over the course of the study has to follow a standardized protocol. (4) Criteria for analysis and interpretation have to be prospectively specified. (5) Studies focusing on diagnostic/therapeutic issues need to specify standards for diagnostic criteria and related therapeutic interventions.

摘要

2009年7月1日,德国卫生服务研究网络[德国卫生服务研究协会(DNVF e. V.)]批准了由作为作者提及的成员协会支持并发表于本期刊[《卫生事业》2009年;71:505 - 510]的《备忘录III:卫生服务研究方法》。这是一篇关于“卫生服务研究中的生活质量评估”的深度文章。在健康科学背景下,生活质量(QL)涵盖身体、心理和社会领域的主观幸福感及功能状况。QL反映了“真正影响患者”的医疗保健方面。QL是患者主要体验到的、他们所谈论的内容,并且在很大程度上影响着社会对医疗服务及流程的接受度。因此,QL可被视为卫生服务研究中一个极其重要的终点指标。德国社会法和效用分析条约也强调了生活质量这一概念的重要性。本文是关于卫生服务研究与QL概念及评估之间关系的首篇论述。我们的工作组明确了卫生服务研究中QL评估的关键标准。(1)评估工具需符合标准质量标准(可靠性、有效性、敏感性、可解释性),且选用特定工具的决定必须有合理依据。(2)研究设计和研究人群必须与科研问题相匹配,样本量必须在生物统计学上合理。(3)包括研究过程中的时间点在内的QL评估必须遵循标准化方案。(4)分析和解释标准必须预先明确。(5)专注于诊断/治疗问题的研究需要明确诊断标准及相关治疗干预的标准。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验