• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

死亡、脑死亡与科学的局限:为何全脑死亡概念是有缺陷的公共政策。

Death, brain death, and the limits of science: why the whole-brain concept of death is a flawed public policy.

机构信息

Clinical Trials Support Division, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research.

出版信息

J Law Med Ethics. 2010 Fall;38(3):667-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2010.00520.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2010.00520.x
PMID:20880249
Abstract

Legally defining "death" in terms of brain death unacceptably obscures a value judgment that not all reasonable people would accept. This is disingenuous, and it results in serious moral flaws in the medical practices surrounding organ donation. Public policy that relies on the whole-brain concept of death is therefore morally flawed and in need of revision.

摘要

从法律上定义脑死亡为“死亡”,不可避免地掩盖了一个并非所有合理的人都能接受的价值判断。这是虚伪的,导致了围绕器官捐赠的医疗实践中的严重道德缺陷。因此,依赖全脑概念的公共政策在道德上是有缺陷的,需要修订。

相似文献

1
Death, brain death, and the limits of science: why the whole-brain concept of death is a flawed public policy.死亡、脑死亡与科学的局限:为何全脑死亡概念是有缺陷的公共政策。
J Law Med Ethics. 2010 Fall;38(3):667-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2010.00520.x.
2
Is heart transplantation after circulatory death compatible with the dead donor rule?循环死亡后心脏移植是否符合死亡供体规则?
J Med Ethics. 2016 May;42(5):319-20. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103464. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
3
Changing the conversation about brain death.改变关于脑死亡的讨论。
Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(8):9-14. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.925154.
4
How to Communicate Clearly about Brain Death and First-Person Consent to Donate.如何清晰地沟通脑死亡及捐赠的第一人称同意问题。
AMA J Ethics. 2016 Feb 1;18(2):108-14. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.2.ecas2-1602.
5
The dead donor rule: true by definition.死亡捐献者规则:从定义上来说是成立的。
Am J Bioeth. 2003 Winter;3(1):10-1. doi: 10.1162/152651603321611791.
6
The diagnosis of brainstem death and its implications.脑干死亡的诊断及其影响。
Nurs Times. 2006;102(13):28-30.
7
Donation after circulatory death: burying the dead donor rule.心跳停止后捐献:埋葬死亡供体规则。
Am J Bioeth. 2011 Aug;11(8):36-43. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.583319.
8
Brain death and organ donation.脑死亡与器官捐献。
Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2000 Dec;12(4):531-8.
9
Organ Donation, Brain Death and the Family: Valid Informed Consent.器官捐赠、脑死亡与家属:有效的知情同意
J Law Med Ethics. 2015 Summer;43(2):369-82. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12254.
10
Scientific, legal, and ethical challenges of end-of-life organ procurement in emergency medicine.急诊医学中终末期器官获取的科学、法律和伦理挑战。
Resuscitation. 2010 Sep;81(9):1069-78. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.05.007. Epub 2010 Jun 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The intractable problems with brain death and possible solutions.脑死亡的棘手问题及可能的解决方案。
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2021 Oct 9;16(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13010-021-00107-9.
2
Deceased Organ Transplantation in Bangladesh: The Dynamics of Bioethics, Religion and Culture.孟加拉国的已故器官移植:生物伦理学、宗教和文化的动态。
HEC Forum. 2022 Jun;34(2):139-167. doi: 10.1007/s10730-020-09436-2. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
3
Does the Uniform Determination of Death Act Need to Be Revised?《统一死亡判定法案》是否需要修订?
Linacre Q. 2020 Aug;87(3):317-333. doi: 10.1177/0024363920926018. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
4
Evolution of the Criteria of "Brain Death": A Critical Analysis Based on Scientific Realism and Christian Anthropology.“脑死亡”标准的演变:基于科学实在论和基督教人类学的批判性分析
Linacre Q. 2019 Nov;86(4):297-313. doi: 10.1177/0024363919869474. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
5
Whole-brain death and integration: realigning the ontological concept with clinical diagnostic tests.全脑死亡与整合:使本体论概念与临床诊断测试相一致。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2019 Oct;40(5):455-481. doi: 10.1007/s11017-019-09504-w.
6
When are you dead enough to be a donor? Can any feasible protocol for the determination of death on circulatory criteria respect the dead donor rule?何时你才算死亡,可以捐献器官?任何基于循环标准判定死亡的可行方案,是否都能尊重死亡供者规则?
Theor Med Bioeth. 2019 Aug;40(4):299-319. doi: 10.1007/s11017-019-09500-0.
7
Brain death and true patient care.脑死亡与真正的患者护理。
Linacre Q. 2016 Aug;83(3):258-282. doi: 10.1080/00243639.2016.1188472.
8
When Brain Death Belies Belief.当脑死亡与信仰相悖时。
J Relig Health. 2016 Dec;55(6):2199-213. doi: 10.1007/s10943-016-0298-4.
9
Re-Examining the Origin and Application of Determination of Death by Neurological Criteria (DDNC) : A Commentary on "The Case for Reasonable Accommodation of Conscientious Objections to Declarations of Brain Death" by L. Syd M. Johnson.重新审视神经学标准判定死亡(DDNC)的起源与应用:对L. Syd M. Johnson所著《合理接纳对脑死亡宣告的良心反对之理由》的评论
J Bioeth Inq. 2016 Mar;13(1):27-9. doi: 10.1007/s11673-016-9709-1. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
10
Moral Evaluations of Organ Transplantation Influence Judgments of Death and Causation.对器官移植的道德评估会影响对死亡和因果关系的判断。
Neuroethics. 2015;8(3):283-297. doi: 10.1007/s12152-015-9239-2. Epub 2015 Aug 11.