Suppr超能文献

“脑死亡”标准的演变:基于科学实在论和基督教人类学的批判性分析

Evolution of the Criteria of "Brain Death": A Critical Analysis Based on Scientific Realism and Christian Anthropology.

作者信息

Nguyen Doyen

机构信息

Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Linacre Q. 2019 Nov;86(4):297-313. doi: 10.1177/0024363919869474. Epub 2019 Sep 9.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

"Brain death" (understood in the sense of "whole brain death" and not in the sense of "brainstem death") was introduced into clinical practice in 1968 when the Harvard Ad Hoc Committee defined irreversible coma as a new criterion for death (understood in the full sense of the word). According to the Uniform Determination of Death Act (UDDA), promulgated in 1981 by the President's Commission (which also formally advanced the first conceptual rationale for brain death), the legal declaration of death using the brain death standard requires the irreversible cessation of all functions of the entire brain, including the brain stem. The brain death standard has since evolved, however, to include significant modifications even though, on a literal reading, its clinical test criteria have remained unchanged. This article gives an account of why and how the brain death standard has been updated, leading to the currently practiced guidelines for the determination of brain death put forth by the American Academy of Neurology. According to the updated standard, the presence of certain brain or spinal cord functions does not invalidate the diagnosis of brain death. By analyzing these guidelines critically on the basis of scientific realism and Thomistic hylomorphism, this article demonstrates that the updated brain death standard contradicts both the UDDA and the tenets of sound anthropology held by the Catholic Church.

SUMMARY

This article examines the evolution of the "brain death" standard from the time of its introduction by the Harvard Committee until the current guidelines established by the American Academy of Neurology. This evolution consists mainly of a selective discarding of certain brain and spinal cord functions that are deemed insignificant. Based on the principles of scientific realism and a Thomistic substance view of human nature, this article shows that the evolved standard contradicts both the Uniform Determination of Death Act definition of brain death and the fundamental tenets of Christian anthropology as taught by the Catholic Church.

摘要

未标注

“脑死亡”(这里指“全脑死亡”,而非“脑干死亡”)于1968年被引入临床实践,当时哈佛特设委员会将不可逆昏迷定义为一种新的死亡标准(从该词的完整意义上来说)。根据总统委员会于1981年颁布的《统一死亡判定法案》(UDDA)(该委员会也正式提出了脑死亡的首个概念依据),使用脑死亡标准进行死亡的法律宣告要求整个大脑,包括脑干的所有功能不可逆地停止。然而,自那时起脑死亡标准不断演变,即便从字面解读其临床测试标准未变,但仍有重大修改。本文阐述了脑死亡标准更新的原因及方式,引出了美国神经病学学会目前所推行的脑死亡判定指南。根据更新后的标准,某些脑或脊髓功能的存在并不否定脑死亡的诊断。通过基于科学实在论和托马斯主义形质论对这些指南进行批判性分析,本文表明更新后的脑死亡标准既与《统一死亡判定法案》相矛盾,也与天主教会秉持的合理人类学原则相悖。

总结

本文审视了“脑死亡”标准从哈佛委员会引入之时到美国神经病学学会制定现行指南期间的演变。这种演变主要包括有选择地摒弃某些被认为不重要的脑和脊髓功能。基于科学实在论原则以及对人性的托马斯主义实体观,本文表明演变后的标准既与《统一死亡判定法案》对脑死亡的定义相矛盾,也与天主教会所传授的基督教人类学基本教义相悖。

相似文献

2
Does the Uniform Determination of Death Act Need to Be Revised?《统一死亡判定法案》是否需要修订?
Linacre Q. 2020 Aug;87(3):317-333. doi: 10.1177/0024363920926018. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
6
The Uniform Determination of Death Act is Being Revised.《统一死亡判定法案》正在修订中。
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Apr;36(2):335-338. doi: 10.1007/s12028-021-01439-2. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
9
A Thomistic defense of whole-brain death.对全脑死亡的托马斯主义辩护。
Linacre Q. 2015 Aug;82(3):235-50. doi: 10.1179/2050854915Y.0000000005.

引用本文的文献

2
The beginning of becoming a human.人类的起源。
Aging (Albany NY). 2024 May 6;16(9):8378-8395. doi: 10.18632/aging.205824.
3
Does the Uniform Determination of Death Act Need to Be Revised?《统一死亡判定法案》是否需要修订?
Linacre Q. 2020 Aug;87(3):317-333. doi: 10.1177/0024363920926018. Epub 2020 Jun 2.

本文引用的文献

2
Brain death and true patient care.脑死亡与真正的患者护理。
Linacre Q. 2016 Aug;83(3):258-282. doi: 10.1080/00243639.2016.1188472.
4
10
Total brain death: a reply to Alan Shewmon.全脑死亡:对艾伦·休蒙的回复。
Bioethics. 2012 Jun;26(5):275-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01846.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验