Department of Psychology, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Assessment. 2011 Mar;18(1):27-38. doi: 10.1177/1073191110382848. Epub 2010 Sep 29.
The present study evaluated the latent structure of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO FFI) and relations between the five-factor model (FFM) of personality and dimensions of DSM-IV anxiety and depressive disorders (panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder [GAD], obsessive-compulsive disorder, social phobia [SOC], major depressive disorder [MDD]) in a large sample of outpatients (N = 1,980). Exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) was used to show that a five-factor solution provided acceptable model fit, albeit with some poorly functioning items. Neuroticism demonstrated significant positive associations with all but one of the disorder constructs whereas Extraversion was inversely related to SOC and MDD. Conscientiousness was inversely related to MDD but demonstrated a positive relationship with GAD. Results are discussed in regard to potential revisions to the NEO FFI, the evaluation of other NEO instruments using ESEM, and clinical implications of structural paths between FFM domains and specific emotional disorders.
本研究评估了 NEO 五因素人格量表(NEO FFI)的潜在结构,以及人格的五因素模型(FFM)与 DSM-IV 焦虑和抑郁障碍(惊恐障碍、广泛性焦虑障碍[GAD]、强迫症、社交恐惧症[SOC]、重度抑郁症[MDD])维度之间的关系,该研究样本为大量门诊患者(N=1980)。探索性结构方程建模(ESEM)表明,五因素模型提供了可接受的模型拟合度,尽管存在一些功能不佳的项目。神经质与除一种障碍结构外的所有其他障碍结构均呈显著正相关,而外向性与 SOC 和 MDD 呈负相关。尽责性与 MDD 呈负相关,但与 GAD 呈正相关。研究结果讨论了对 NEO FFI 的潜在修订、使用 ESEM 对其他 NEO 工具的评估,以及 FFM 领域与特定情绪障碍之间结构路径的临床意义。