• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ExaCT:从期刊出版物中自动提取临床试验特征。

ExaCT: automatic extraction of clinical trial characteristics from journal publications.

机构信息

Institute for Information Technology, National Research Council, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010 Sep 28;10:56. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-56.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6947-10-56
PMID:20920176
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2954855/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials are one of the most important sources of evidence for guiding evidence-based practice and the design of new trials. However, most of this information is available only in free text - e.g., in journal publications - which is labour intensive to process for systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and other evidence synthesis studies. This paper presents an automatic information extraction system, called ExaCT, that assists users with locating and extracting key trial characteristics (e.g., eligibility criteria, sample size, drug dosage, primary outcomes) from full-text journal articles reporting on randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

ExaCT consists of two parts: an information extraction (IE) engine that searches the article for text fragments that best describe the trial characteristics, and a web browser-based user interface that allows human reviewers to assess and modify the suggested selections. The IE engine uses a statistical text classifier to locate those sentences that have the highest probability of describing a trial characteristic. Then, the IE engine's second stage applies simple rules to these sentences to extract text fragments containing the target answer. The same approach is used for all 21 trial characteristics selected for this study.

RESULTS

We evaluated ExaCT using 50 previously unseen articles describing RCTs. The text classifier (first stage) was able to recover 88% of relevant sentences among its top five candidates (top5 recall) with the topmost candidate being relevant in 80% of cases (top1 precision). Precision and recall of the extraction rules (second stage) were 93% and 91%, respectively. Together, the two stages of the extraction engine were able to provide (partially) correct solutions in 992 out of 1050 test tasks (94%), with a majority of these (696) representing fully correct and complete answers.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experiments confirmed the applicability and efficacy of ExaCT. Furthermore, they demonstrated that combining a statistical method with 'weak' extraction rules can identify a variety of study characteristics. The system is flexible and can be extended to handle other characteristics and document types (e.g., study protocols).

摘要

背景

临床试验是指导循证实践和新试验设计的最重要证据来源之一。然而,这些信息大多只以自由文本的形式存在,例如在期刊出版物中,这对于系统评价、荟萃分析和其他证据综合研究来说是一项劳动密集型的工作。本文介绍了一种名为 ExaCT 的自动信息提取系统,该系统可帮助用户从报告随机对照试验(RCT)的全文期刊文章中定位和提取关键试验特征(例如,纳入标准、样本量、药物剂量、主要结局)。

方法

ExaCT 由两部分组成:一个信息提取(IE)引擎,用于在文章中搜索最能描述试验特征的文本片段;以及一个基于网络浏览器的用户界面,允许人工审阅者评估和修改建议的选择。IE 引擎使用统计文本分类器来定位那些最有可能描述试验特征的句子。然后,IE 引擎的第二阶段对这些句子应用简单的规则来提取包含目标答案的文本片段。这种方法适用于本研究中选择的所有 21 个试验特征。

结果

我们使用 50 篇以前未见过的描述 RCT 的文章来评估 ExaCT。文本分类器(第一阶段)能够在其前五个候选者中(前 5 召回率)恢复 88%的相关句子,其中最上面的候选者在 80%的情况下是相关的(前 1 召回率)。提取规则(第二阶段)的精度和召回率分别为 93%和 91%。提取引擎的两个阶段总共能够在 1050 个测试任务中的 992 个任务中提供(部分)正确的解决方案(94%),其中大多数(696 个)表示完全正确和完整的答案。

结论

我们的实验证实了 ExaCT 的适用性和有效性。此外,它们表明,将统计方法与“弱”提取规则相结合,可以识别各种研究特征。该系统具有灵活性,可以扩展到处理其他特征和文档类型(例如,研究方案)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1150/2954855/d5f5f28a6552/1472-6947-10-56-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1150/2954855/ea7e4a401f2c/1472-6947-10-56-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1150/2954855/6be18a16ff5a/1472-6947-10-56-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1150/2954855/d83fd3bd7d17/1472-6947-10-56-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1150/2954855/d5f5f28a6552/1472-6947-10-56-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1150/2954855/ea7e4a401f2c/1472-6947-10-56-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1150/2954855/6be18a16ff5a/1472-6947-10-56-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1150/2954855/d83fd3bd7d17/1472-6947-10-56-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1150/2954855/d5f5f28a6552/1472-6947-10-56-4.jpg

相似文献

1
ExaCT: automatic extraction of clinical trial characteristics from journal publications.ExaCT:从期刊出版物中自动提取临床试验特征。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010 Sep 28;10:56. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-56.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Automated information extraction of key trial design elements from clinical trial publications.从临床试验出版物中自动提取关键试验设计要素的信息。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008 Nov 6;2008:141-5.
4
Comparing generative and extractive approaches to information extraction from abstracts describing randomized clinical trials.比较从描述随机临床试验的摘要中提取信息的生成式方法和抽取式方法。
J Biomed Semantics. 2024 Apr 23;15(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13326-024-00305-2.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Automatic extraction of quantitative data from ClinicalTrials.gov to conduct meta-analyses.从 ClinicalTrials.gov 自动提取定量数据进行荟萃分析。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jan;105:92-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.08.023. Epub 2018 Sep 23.
7
Which resources should be used to identify RCT/CCTs for systematic reviews: a systematic review.应使用哪些资源来识别用于系统评价的随机对照试验/对照临床试验:一项系统评价
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Aug 10;5:24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-24.
8
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
9
10
Figure text extraction in biomedical literature.生物医学文献中的图表文本提取。
PLoS One. 2011 Jan 13;6(1):e15338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015338.

引用本文的文献

1
Large Language Model Analysis of Reporting Quality of Randomized Clinical Trial Articles: A Systematic Review.随机临床试验文章报告质量的大语言模型分析:一项系统评价
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2529418. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.29418.
2
A foundation model for human-AI collaboration in medical literature mining.医学文献挖掘中人类与人工智能协作的基础模型。
ArXiv. 2025 Jan 27:arXiv:2501.16255v1.
3
Automating updates for scoping reviews on the environmental drivers of human and animal diseases: a comparative analysis of AI methods.

本文引用的文献

1
The human studies database project: federating human studies design data using the ontology of clinical research.人类研究数据库项目:使用临床研究本体联合人类研究设计数据。
Summit Transl Bioinform. 2010 Mar 1;2010:51-5.
2
Development and evaluation of a study design typology for human research.人类研究中研究设计类型学的开发与评估
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2009 Nov 14;2009:81-5.
3
Automatically classifying sentences in full-text biomedical articles into Introduction, Methods, Results and Discussion.自动将全文生物医学文章中的句子分类为引言、方法、结果和讨论。
自动更新关于人类和动物疾病环境驱动因素的综述:人工智能方法的比较分析
Front Artif Intell. 2025 Jun 10;8:1526820. doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1526820. eCollection 2025.
4
Use of deep learning-based NLP models for full-text data elements extraction for systematic literature review tasks.基于深度学习的自然语言处理模型在系统文献综述任务的全文数据元素提取中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 3;15(1):19379. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03979-5.
5
TrialSieve: A Comprehensive Biomedical Information Extraction Framework for PICO, Meta-Analysis, and Drug Repurposing.试验筛选器:用于PICO、荟萃分析和药物再利用的综合生物医学信息提取框架。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 May 2;12(5):486. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12050486.
6
Digital Tools to Support the Systematic Review Process: An Introduction.支持系统评价过程的数字工具:简介
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Apr;31(3):e70100. doi: 10.1111/jep.70100.
7
SPIRIT-CONSORT-TM: a corpus for assessing transparency of clinical trial protocol and results publications.SPIRIT-CONSORT-TM:一个用于评估临床试验方案和结果出版物透明度的语料库。
Sci Data. 2025 Feb 28;12(1):355. doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-04629-1.
8
SPIRIT-CONSORT-TM: a corpus for assessing transparency of clinical trial protocol and results publications.SPIRIT-CONSORT-TM:一个用于评估临床试验方案和结果出版物透明度的语料库。
medRxiv. 2025 Jan 15:2025.01.14.25320543. doi: 10.1101/2025.01.14.25320543.
9
The FAIR database: facilitating access to public health research literature.公平数据库:促进对公共卫生研究文献的获取。
JAMIA Open. 2024 Dec 13;7(4):ooae139. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae139. eCollection 2024 Dec.
10
Predicting the sample size of randomized controlled trials using natural language processing.使用自然语言处理预测随机对照试验的样本量。
JAMIA Open. 2024 Oct 25;7(4):ooae116. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae116. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Bioinformatics. 2009 Dec 1;25(23):3174-80. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp548. Epub 2009 Sep 25.
4
Sentence retrieval for abstracts of randomized controlled trials.随机对照试验摘要的句子检索
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009 Feb 10;9:10. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-9-10.
5
Towards identifying intervention arms in randomized controlled trials: extracting coordinating constructions.旨在识别随机对照试验中的干预措施:提取协调结构。
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Oct;42(5):790-800. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.12.011. Epub 2009 Jan 4.
6
Automated information extraction of key trial design elements from clinical trial publications.从临床试验出版物中自动提取关键试验设计要素的信息。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008 Nov 6;2008:141-5.
7
A method of extracting the number of trial participants from abstracts describing randomized controlled trials.一种从描述随机对照试验的摘要中提取试验参与者数量的方法。
J Telemed Telecare. 2008;14(7):354-8. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2008.007007.
8
Extracting information from textual documents in the electronic health record: a review of recent research.从电子健康记录中的文本文件提取信息:近期研究综述
Yearb Med Inform. 2008:128-44.
9
Automated acquisition of disease drug knowledge from biomedical and clinical documents: an initial study.从生物医学和临床文档中自动获取疾病药物知识:一项初步研究。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 Jan-Feb;15(1):87-98. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2401. Epub 2007 Oct 18.
10
Combining text classification and Hidden Markov Modeling techniques for categorizing sentences in randomized clinical trial abstracts.结合文本分类和隐马尔可夫建模技术对随机临床试验摘要中的句子进行分类。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006;2006:824-8.