Department of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Crit Care Med. 2011 Jan;39(1):40-5. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181fa4196.
The association between tobacco smoke exposure and critical illness is not well studied, largely because obtaining an accurate smoking history from critically ill patients is difficult. Biomarkers can provide quantitative data on active and secondhand cigarette smoke exposure. We sought to compare cigarette smoke exposure as measured by biomarkers to exposure by self-report in a cohort of critically ill patients and to determine how well biomarkers of cigarette smoke exposure correlate with each other in this population.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Serum and urine cotinine and trans-3'-hydroxycotinine, urine 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol, and hair and nail nicotine levels were measured in 60 subjects enrolled in an observational cohort of critically ill subjects at a tertiary academic medical center in Tennessee. Smoking history was obtained from patients, their surrogates, or the medical chart. Cigarette smoke exposure as measured by biomarkers was compared to exposure by history.
By smoking history, 29 subjects were identified as smokers, 28 were identified as nonsmokers, and 3 were identified as unknown. The combination of serum cotinine and urine 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol identified 27 of the 28 nonsmokers by history either as active smokers (n = 6, 21%) or as exposed to secondhand smoke (n = 21, 75%). All biomarker levels were strongly correlated with each other (r = .69-.95, p < .0001).
The combination of serum cotinine and urine 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol identified considerably more active smokers than did smoking history and detected a high prevalence of secondhand smoke exposure in a critically ill population. These markers will be important for future studies investigating the relationship between active smoking and secondhand smoke exposure and critical illness.
吸烟与危重病之间的关系尚未得到充分研究,主要是因为从危重病患者那里获得准确的吸烟史比较困难。生物标志物可以提供关于主动和二手香烟暴露的定量数据。我们试图比较生物标志物测量的香烟暴露与该队列中危重病患者自我报告的暴露,并确定在该人群中香烟暴露的生物标志物彼此之间的相关性如何。
设计、地点和患者:在田纳西州一家三级学术医疗中心的一项观察性危重病患者队列研究中,对 60 名受试者的血清和尿液中的可替宁和反式-3'-羟基可替宁、尿液中的 4-(甲基亚硝氨基)-1-(3-吡啶基)-1-丁醇,以及头发和指甲中的尼古丁水平进行了测量。从患者、其代理人或病历中获取吸烟史。通过生物标志物测量的吸烟暴露与通过病史获得的暴露进行了比较。
根据吸烟史,29 名受试者被确定为吸烟者,28 名被确定为非吸烟者,3 名被确定为未知。血清可替宁和尿液 4-(甲基亚硝氨基)-1-(3-吡啶基)-1-丁醇的组合通过病史将 28 名非吸烟者中的 27 名确定为主动吸烟者(n = 6,21%)或暴露于二手烟(n = 21,75%)。所有生物标志物水平彼此之间均高度相关(r =.69-.95,p <.0001)。
血清可替宁和尿液 4-(甲基亚硝氨基)-1-(3-吡啶基)-1-丁醇的组合比吸烟史更能识别出大量的主动吸烟者,并在危重病患者群体中检测到二手烟暴露的高患病率。这些标志物对于未来研究主动吸烟和二手烟暴露与危重病之间的关系将非常重要。