• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Interpreting scores on multiple sclerosis-specific patient reported outcome measures (the PRIMUS and U-FIS).解读多发性硬化症特定患者报告结局测量工具(PRIMUS 和 U-FIS)的评分。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Oct 11;8:117. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-117.
2
Use of the PRIMUS scale to assess quality of life in a Spanish population of multiple sclerosis patients.使用 PRIMUS 量表评估西班牙多发性硬化症患者的生活质量。
Neurologia. 2013 Jul-Aug;28(6):340-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nrl.2012.06.003. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
3
International development of the patient-reported outcome indices for multiple sclerosis (PRIMUS).多发性硬化症患者报告结局指标的国际发展(PRIMUS)。
Value Health. 2010 Dec;13(8):946-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00767.x.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
The development of patient-reported outcome indices for multiple sclerosis (PRIMUS).多发性硬化症患者报告结局指标的开发(PRIMUS)。
Mult Scler. 2009 Sep;15(9):1092-102. doi: 10.1177/1352458509106513. Epub 2009 Jun 25.
6
The multiple sclerosis rating scale, revised (MSRS-R): development, refinement, and psychometric validation using an online community.多发性硬化症评定量表修订版(MSRS-R):使用在线社区开发、改进和心理计量验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Jun 18;10:70. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-70.
7
Establishing clinically meaningful within-individual improvement thresholds for eight patient-reported outcome measures in people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.确立复发缓解型多发性硬化患者 8 项患者报告结局测量指标的临床有意义个体内改善阈值。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 Jul 4;7(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00594-8.
8
Health perceptions and clinical characteristics of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients: baseline data from an international clinical trial.复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者的健康认知与临床特征:一项国际临床试验的基线数据
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 May;25(5):1121-30. doi: 10.1185/03007990902797675.
9
Low-fat, plant-based diet in multiple sclerosis: A randomized controlled trial.低脂、植物性饮食对多发性硬化症的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2016 Sep;9:80-90. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2016.07.001. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
10
Effect of an intensive 3-day social cognitive treatment (can do treatment) on control self-efficacy in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis and low disability: A single-centre randomized controlled trial.强化 3 天社会认知治疗(能做治疗)对复发缓解型多发性硬化症且残疾程度较低患者的自我效能控制的影响:一项单中心随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 10;14(10):e0223482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223482. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018 Nov 8;4(1):43. doi: 10.1038/s41572-018-0041-4.
2
Minimal important differences for fatigue patient reported outcome measures-a systematic review.疲劳患者报告结局测量的最小重要差异——一项系统评价
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 May 26;16:62. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0167-6.
3
A review of the psychometric properties of generic utility measures in multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症中通用效用测量的心理测量特性综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Aug;32(8):759-73. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0167-5.
4
Using existing data to identify candidate items for a health state classification system in multiple sclerosis.利用现有数据确定用于多发性硬化症健康状态分类系统的候选条目。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Jun;23(5):1445-57. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0604-5. Epub 2013 Dec 15.
5
Evaluation of an online platform for multiple sclerosis research: patient description, validation of severity scale, and exploration of BMI effects on disease course.在线多发性硬化症研究平台评估:患者描述、严重程度量表验证以及 BMI 对疾病进程影响的探索。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59707. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059707. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
6
Validation of a new quality of life scale related to multiple sclerosis and relapses.验证一种新的与多发性硬化症和复发相关的生活质量量表。
Qual Life Res. 2013 Oct;22(8):1943-54. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0334-0. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
7
The multiple sclerosis rating scale, revised (MSRS-R): development, refinement, and psychometric validation using an online community.多发性硬化症评定量表修订版(MSRS-R):使用在线社区开发、改进和心理计量验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Jun 18;10:70. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-70.
8
Self-report fatigue questionnaires in multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease and stroke: a systematic review of measurement properties.多发性硬化症、帕金森病和中风患者的自报告疲劳问卷:测量特性的系统评价。
Qual Life Res. 2012 Aug;21(6):925-44. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-0009-2. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
9
Assessing the stroke-specific quality of life for outcome measurement in stroke rehabilitation: minimal detectable change and clinically important difference.评估脑卒中康复结局测量中的脑卒中特异性生活质量:最小有意义变化和临床有意义差异。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 Jan 19;9:5. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Retracted: Consensus Guidelines for CSF and Blood Biobanking for CNS Biomarker Studies.撤回:中枢神经系统生物标志物研究的脑脊液和血液生物样本库共识指南。
Mult Scler Int. 2016;2016:8304273. doi: 10.1155/2016/8304273. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
2
International development of the patient-reported outcome indices for multiple sclerosis (PRIMUS).多发性硬化症患者报告结局指标的国际发展(PRIMUS)。
Value Health. 2010 Dec;13(8):946-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00767.x.
3
Minimally important difference for patient-reported outcomes in psoriatic arthritis: Health Assessment Questionnaire and pain, fatigue, and global visual analog scales.在银屑病关节炎患者报告结局中最小有意义差异:健康评估问卷和疼痛、疲劳和整体视觉模拟量表。
J Rheumatol. 2010 May;37(5):1024-8. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.090832. Epub 2010 Mar 15.
4
International development of the Unidimensional Fatigue Impact Scale (U-FIS).多维疲劳影响量表(U-FIS)的国际发展。
Value Health. 2010 Jun-Jul;13(4):463-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00706.x. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
5
Fear of hypoglycaemia: defining a minimum clinically important difference in patients with type 2 diabetes.低血糖恐惧:2 型糖尿病患者的最小临床重要差异定义。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009 Oct 22;7:91. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-91.
6
The minimal detectable change cannot reliably replace the minimal important difference.最小可检测变化不能可靠地替代最小有意义差异。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jan;63(1):28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.01.024. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
7
The minimally important difference for patient reported outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus including the HAQ-DI, pain, fatigue, and SF-36.系统性红斑狼疮患者报告结局的最小重要差异,包括 HAQ-DI、疼痛、疲劳和 SF-36。
J Rheumatol. 2009 Oct;36(10):2231-7. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.090193. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
8
The development of patient-reported outcome indices for multiple sclerosis (PRIMUS).多发性硬化症患者报告结局指标的开发(PRIMUS)。
Mult Scler. 2009 Sep;15(9):1092-102. doi: 10.1177/1352458509106513. Epub 2009 Jun 25.
9
The development and validation of the Unidimensional Fatigue Impact Scale (U-FIS).多维疲劳影响量表(U-FIS)的编制与验证。
Mult Scler. 2009 Oct;15(10):1228-38. doi: 10.1177/1352458509106714. Epub 2009 Jun 25.
10
Quality of life in 1000 patients with early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.1000例早期复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者的生活质量
Eur J Neurol. 2009 Jun;16(6):713-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02572.x.

解读多发性硬化症特定患者报告结局测量工具(PRIMUS 和 U-FIS)的评分。

Interpreting scores on multiple sclerosis-specific patient reported outcome measures (the PRIMUS and U-FIS).

机构信息

Galen Research Ltd, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Oct 11;8:117. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-117.

DOI:10.1186/1477-7525-8-117
PMID:20937112
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2964544/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The PRIMUS is a Multiple Sclerosis (MS)-specific suite of outcome measures including assessments of QoL (PRIMUS QoL, scored 0-22) and activity limitations (PRIMUS Activities, scored 0-30). The U-FIS is a measure of fatigue impact (scored 0-66). These measures have been fully validated previously using an MS sample with mixed diagnoses. The aim of the present study was to validate the measures further in a specifically Relapse Remitting MS (RRMS) sample and to provide preliminary evidence of the responder definitions (RD; also known as minimal important difference) for these instruments.

METHODS

Data were derived from a multi-country efficacy trial of MS patients with assessments at baseline and 12 months. Baseline data were used to assess the internal reliability and validity of the measures. Both anchor-based and distribution-based approaches were employed for estimating RD. Anchor-based estimates were based on published RD values for the EQ-5D and were assessed for those improving and deteriorating separately. Distribution-based estimates were based on standard error of measurement (SEM), change score equivalent to 0.30, and change score equivalent to 0.50, effect sizes (ES).

RESULTS

The sample included 911 RRMS patients (67.3% female, age mean (SD) 36.2 (8.4) years, duration of MS mean (SD) 4.8 (5.2) years). Results showed that the PRIMUS and U-FIS had good internal consistency. Appropriate correlations were observed with comparator instruments and both measures were able to distinguish between participants based on Expanded Disability Status Scale scores and time since diagnosis. The anchor-based and distribution-based RD estimates were: PRIMUS Activities range = 1.2-2.3, PRIMUS QoL range = 1.0-2.2, and U-FIS range = 2.4-7.0.

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that the PRIMUS and U-FIS are valid instruments for use with RRMS patients. The analyses provide preliminary information on how to interpret scores on the scales. These data will be useful for assessing treatment efficacy and for powering clinical studies. TRIAL REFERENCE NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00340834.

摘要

背景

PRIMUS 是一套多发性硬化症(MS)专用的评估工具,包括生活质量评估(PRIMUS QoL,评分范围 0-22)和活动能力受限评估(PRIMUS Activities,评分范围 0-30)。U-FIS 是衡量疲劳影响的指标(评分范围 0-66)。这些工具之前已经在混合诊断的 MS 样本中进行了充分验证。本研究的目的是进一步在特定的复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)样本中验证这些工具,并为这些工具的响应定义(RD;也称为最小有意义差异)提供初步证据。

方法

数据来自一项多国多发性硬化症患者疗效试验,在基线和 12 个月时进行评估。使用基线数据评估这些工具的内部可靠性和有效性。采用基于锚定和基于分布的方法来估计 RD。基于已发表的 EQ-5D RD 值来进行基于锚定的估计,并分别评估那些改善和恶化的患者。基于分布的估计是基于测量误差的标准误差(SEM)、变化评分等于 0.30 和变化评分等于 0.50、效应量(ES)。

结果

样本包括 911 名 RRMS 患者(67.3%为女性,年龄平均(SD)为 36.2(8.4)岁,多发性硬化症平均(SD)病程为 4.8(5.2)年)。结果表明,PRIMUS 和 U-FIS 具有良好的内部一致性。与对照工具观察到适当的相关性,并且这两种工具都能够根据扩展残疾状况量表评分和诊断后时间来区分参与者。基于锚定和基于分布的 RD 估计值为:PRIMUS Activities 范围=1.2-2.3,PRIMUS QoL 范围=1.0-2.2,U-FIS 范围=2.4-7.0。

结论

结果表明,PRIMUS 和 U-FIS 是用于 RRMS 患者的有效工具。这些分析提供了有关如何解释量表得分的初步信息。这些数据将有助于评估治疗效果和为临床试验提供动力。试验参考编号:ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符 NCT00340834。