• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估脑卒中康复结局测量中的脑卒中特异性生活质量:最小有意义变化和临床有意义差异。

Assessing the stroke-specific quality of life for outcome measurement in stroke rehabilitation: minimal detectable change and clinically important difference.

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 Jan 19;9:5. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-5.

DOI:10.1186/1477-7525-9-5
PMID:21247433
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3034658/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to establish the minimal detectable change (MDC) and clinically important differences (CIDs) of the physical category of the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale in patients with stroke.

METHODS

MDC and CIDs scores were calculated from the data of 74 participants enrolled in randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of two rehabilitation programs in patients with stroke. These participants received treatments for 3 weeks and underwent clinical assessment before and after treatment. To obtain test-retest reliability for calculating MDC, another 25 patients with chronic stroke were recruited. The MDC was calculated from the standard error of measurement (SEM) to indicate a real change with 95% confidence for individual patients (MDC95). Distribution-based and anchor-based methods were adopted to triangulate the ranges of minimal CIDs. The percentage of scale width was calculated by dividing the MDC and CIDs by the total score range of each physical category. The percentage of patients exceeding MDC95 and minimal CIDs was also reported.

RESULTS

The MDC95 of the mobility, self-care, and upper extremity (UE) function subscales were 5.9, 4.0, and 5.3 respectively. The minimal CID ranges for these 3 subscales were 1.5 to 2.4, 1.2 to 1.9, and 1.2 to 1.8. The percentage of patients exceeding MDC95 and minimal CIDs of the mobility, self-care, and UE function subscales were 9.5% to 28.4%, 6.8% to 28.4%, and 12.2% to 33.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The change score of an individual patient has to reach 5.9, 4.0, and 5.3 on the 3 subscales to indicate a true change. The mean change scores of a group of patients with stroke on these subscales should reach the lower bound of CID ranges of 1.5 (6.3% scale width), 1.2 (6.0% scale width), and 1.2 (6.0% scale width) to be regarded as clinically important change. This information may facilitate interpretations of patient-reported outcomes after stroke rehabilitation. Future research is warranted to validate these findings.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定脑卒中患者脑卒中特异性生活质量量表(SS-QOL)身体状况部分的最小可检测变化(MDC)和临床重要差异(CIDs)。

方法

从 74 名参加两项康复计划随机对照试验的患者数据中计算 MDC 和 CIDs 评分。这些参与者接受了 3 周的治疗,并在治疗前后进行了临床评估。为了获得用于计算 MDC 的测试-重测信度,又招募了 25 名慢性脑卒中患者。MDC 是从测量标准误差(SEM)中计算出来的,以表示个体患者 95%置信区间的真实变化(MDC95)。采用基于分布和基于锚定的方法来确定最小 CIDs 的范围。通过将 MDC 和 CIDs 除以每个身体状况部分的总分范围来计算量表宽度的百分比。还报告了超过 MDC95 和最小 CIDs 的患者比例。

结果

移动、自理和上肢(UE)功能子量表的 MDC95 分别为 5.9、4.0 和 5.3。这 3 个子量表的最小 CID 范围分别为 1.5 至 2.4、1.2 至 1.9 和 1.2 至 1.8。超过 MDC95 和最小 CIDs 的移动、自理和 UE 功能子量表的患者比例分别为 9.5%至 28.4%、6.8%至 28.4%和 12.2%至 33.8%。

结论

个体患者的变化得分必须达到 3 个子量表的 5.9、4.0 和 5.3,才能表明发生了真正的变化。脑卒中患者这些子量表的平均变化得分应达到 CID 范围下限 1.5(6.0%量表宽度)、1.2(6.0%量表宽度)和 1.2(6.0%量表宽度),才能被认为是具有临床意义的变化。这些信息可能有助于解释脑卒中康复后的患者报告结局。需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现。

相似文献

1
Assessing the stroke-specific quality of life for outcome measurement in stroke rehabilitation: minimal detectable change and clinically important difference.评估脑卒中康复结局测量中的脑卒中特异性生活质量:最小有意义变化和临床有意义差异。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 Jan 19;9:5. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-5.
2
Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the Stroke Impact Scale in stroke patients.脑卒中影响量表在脑卒中患者中的最小检测变化和临床重要差异。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 Jun;24(5):486-92. doi: 10.1177/1545968309356295. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
3
Responsiveness, minimal detectable change, and minimal clinically important difference of the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale in patients with improved performance after stroke rehabilitation.诺丁汉扩展日常生活活动量表在脑卒中康复后表现改善患者中的反应性、最小可检测变化和最小临床重要差异。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Aug;92(8):1281-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.03.008.
4
Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the Wolf Motor Function Test in stroke patients.中风患者Wolf运动功能测试的最小可检测变化及临床重要差异
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Jun;23(5):429-34. doi: 10.1177/1545968308331144. Epub 2009 Mar 16.
5
Estimating the minimal clinically important difference of upper extremity outcome measures in chronic stroke patients with moderate to severe impairment: a cross-sectional study.评估中重度上肢功能障碍的慢性脑卒中患者上肢结局测量的最小临床重要差异:一项横断面研究。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2024 May;31(4):409-417. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2023.2259649. Epub 2023 Sep 24.
6
Assessing Clinically Important Differences During Rehabilitation for Stroke: A Pilot Study Evaluating Anchor and Distribution Derived Estimates of Physical Function Change in Classically Summed and Rasch Models of Section GG of the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Patient Assessment Instrument.评估脑卒中康复过程中的临床重要差异:一项试点研究,评估了住院康复设施患者评估工具 Section GG 中经典总和模型和 Rasch 模型中物理功能变化的锚和分布导出估计值。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Jul;105(7):1282-1288. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.02.721. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
7
Clinically important differences for the upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer Scale in people with minimal to moderate impairment due to chronic stroke.上肢 Fugl-Meyer 量表在慢性中风导致轻度至中度功能障碍人群中的临床重要差异。
Phys Ther. 2012 Jun;92(6):791-8. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110009. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
8
What is the Minimum Clinically Important Difference for the WOMAC Index After TKA?全膝关节置换术后 WOMAC 指数的最小临床重要差异是多少?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Oct;476(10):2005-2014. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000444.
9
Minimal Clinically Important Differences and Changes in Stroke Disease-Specific Quality of Life in Stroke Survivors: A Prospective Cohort Study.卒中幸存者中最小临床重要差异及卒中疾病特异性生活质量的变化:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Clin Nurs Res. 2023 Mar;32(3):510-517. doi: 10.1177/10547738221113904. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
10
What Are the Minimal and Substantial Improvements in the HOOS and KOOS and JR Versions After Total Joint Replacement?全膝关节置换术后 HOOS 和 KOOS 及 JR 版本的最小和实质性改善是什么?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Dec;476(12):2432-2441. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000456.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Methodological Decisions for Calculating the Minimally Detectable Change in Dysarthria: Reliability, Statistics, and Standard Error of Measurement.探索计算构音障碍最小可检测变化的方法学决策:信度、统计学及测量标准误
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2025 Aug 12;68(8):3771-3788. doi: 10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00899. Epub 2025 Jul 21.
2
Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with extracorporeal shockwave therapy for poststroke spasticity: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.经颅磁刺激联合体外冲击波疗法治疗脑卒中后痉挛的效果:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):e086300. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086300.
3
Cross cultural adaptation and validation of the Hindi version of foot function index.足部功能指数印地语版本的跨文化适应与验证
Chiropr Man Therap. 2024 Dec 5;32(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12998-024-00563-y.
4
Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Scales Reported in Stroke Trials: A Review.中风试验中报告的量表的最小临床重要差异:一项综述。
Brain Sci. 2024 Jan 13;14(1):80. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14010080.
5
Cross-cultural translation, adaptation, and validation of the stroke-specific quality of life (SSQOL) scale 2.0 into Amharic language.将中风专用生活质量量表(SSQOL)2.0 翻译成阿姆哈拉语,并进行跨文化翻译、改编和验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Jan 23;21(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02092-3.
6
Factors Contributing to Sex Differences in Health-Related Quality of Life After Ischemic Stroke: BASIC (Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi) Project.影响缺血性脑卒中后健康相关生活质量性别差异的因素:BASIC(科珀斯克里斯蒂脑卒中专案)项目。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Sep 6;11(17):e026123. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.026123. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
7
Clinimetric properties of the SATIS-Stroke questionnaire in the Brazilian population: A satisfaction assessment measure addressing activities and participation after a stroke.巴西人群中 SATIS-Stroke 问卷的计量特性:一种评估卒中后活动和参与度的满意度评估工具。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2021 Nov-Dec;25(6):719-726. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2021.04.006. Epub 2021 May 13.
8
Vagus nerve stimulation paired with rehabilitation for upper limb motor function after ischaemic stroke (VNS-REHAB): a randomised, blinded, pivotal, device trial.迷走神经刺激联合康复治疗缺血性脑卒中后上肢运动功能(VNS-REHAB):一项随机、盲法、关键性、设备试验。
Lancet. 2021 Apr 24;397(10284):1545-1553. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00475-X.
9
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Igbo language version of the stroke-specific quality of life scale 2.0.跨文化调适与伊博语版脑卒中患者生活质量量表 2.0 的验证。
Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Oct 1;37:111. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2020.37.111.19557. eCollection 2020.
10
Consensus-Based Core Set of Outcome Measures for Clinical Motor Rehabilitation After Stroke-A Delphi Study.基于共识的中风后临床运动康复结局指标核心集——德尔菲研究
Front Neurol. 2020 Sep 2;11:875. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00875. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Randomized trial of distributed constraint-induced therapy versus bilateral arm training for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor control and function after stroke.随机对照试验:分布式约束诱导疗法对比双侧上肢训练对脑卒中后上肢运动控制和功能康复的作用。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011 Feb;25(2):130-9. doi: 10.1177/1545968310380686. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
2
Interpreting scores on multiple sclerosis-specific patient reported outcome measures (the PRIMUS and U-FIS).解读多发性硬化症特定患者报告结局测量工具(PRIMUS 和 U-FIS)的评分。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Oct 11;8:117. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-117.
3
Effects of mode of administration (MOA) on the measurement properties of the EORTC QLQ-C30: a randomized study.给药方式(MOA)对 EORTC QLQ-C30 测量特性的影响:一项随机研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Mar 30;8:35. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-35.
4
Health-related quality of life among Danish patients 3 and 12 months after TIA or mild stroke.丹麦短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)或轻度中风患者在3个月和12个月后的健康相关生活质量。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2010 Jun;24(2):211-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2009.00705.x. Epub 2010 Mar 8.
5
Which variables help explain the poor health-related quality of life after subarachnoid hemorrhage? A meta-analysis.哪些变量有助于解释蛛网膜下腔出血后较差的健康相关生活质量?一项荟萃分析。
Neurosurgery. 2010 Apr;66(4):772-83. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000367548.63164.B2.
6
Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the Stroke Impact Scale in stroke patients.脑卒中影响量表在脑卒中患者中的最小检测变化和临床重要差异。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 Jun;24(5):486-92. doi: 10.1177/1545968309356295. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
7
Effects of electroacupuncture treatment on impaired cognition and quality of life in Taiwanese stroke patients.电针治疗对改善台湾地区脑卒中患者认知功能和生活质量的影响。
J Altern Complement Med. 2009 Oct;15(10):1067-1073.
8
Validation of the Stroke Specific Quality of Life scale in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.验证动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者的中风专用生活质量量表。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010 May;81(5):485-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.184960. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
9
Long-term functional recovery after first ischemic stroke: the Northern Manhattan Study.首次缺血性中风后的长期功能恢复:北曼哈顿研究
Stroke. 2009 Aug;40(8):2805-11. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.549576. Epub 2009 Jun 25.
10
Content comparisons of stroke-specific quality of life based upon the international classification of functioning, disability, and health.基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类的中风特异性生活质量的内容比较。
Qual Life Res. 2009 Aug;18(6):765-73. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9488-9. Epub 2009 May 21.