School of Psychology, University of Kent, United Kingdom.
J Pers Assess. 2010 Nov;92(6):577-85. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2010.513306.
Campbell and Di Paula (2002) suggested differentiating Perfectionistic Striving and Importance of Being Perfect subscales when measuring self-oriented perfectionism and Others' High Standards and Conditional Acceptance subscales when measuring socially prescribed perfectionism. In this study, we investigated the utility of this differentiation by analyzing data from 1,041 students and examining correlations with positive striving and maladaptive evaluation concerns aspects of perfectionism and with positive and negative indicators of well-being and psychological adjustment. As expected, (a) Perfectionistic Striving scores showed higher correlations with positive striving aspects of perfectionism and with positive indicators of well-being and adjustment than Importance of Being Perfect scores, and (b) Conditional Acceptance scores showed higher correlations with maladaptive evaluation concerns aspects of perfectionism and with negative indicators of well-being and adjustment than Others' High Standards scores. The findings indicate that Campbell and Di Paula's differentiation provides for a more detailed and informative assessment of multidimensional perfectionism and its different aspects. Moreover, it provides for new insights into self-oriented and socially prescribed perfectionism and their relationships and associations.
坎贝尔和迪保拉（2002 年）建议，在测量自我导向完美主义时，区分完美主义追求和完美重要性分量表；在测量社会规定的完美主义时，区分他人高标准和条件性接受分量表。在这项研究中，我们通过分析 1041 名学生的数据，并考察与完美主义的积极努力和适应不良评价关注方面以及与幸福感和心理调整的积极和消极指标的相关性，研究了这种区分的效用。正如预期的那样，（a）完美主义追求得分与完美主义的积极努力方面以及幸福感和调整的积极指标的相关性高于完美重要性得分，（b）条件性接受得分与适应不良评价关注方面以及幸福感和调整的消极指标的相关性高于他人高标准得分。研究结果表明，坎贝尔和迪保拉的区分提供了对多维完美主义及其不同方面的更详细和信息丰富的评估。此外，它为自我导向和社会规定的完美主义及其关系和关联提供了新的见解。
