Phillips E M, Byron P R, Fults K, Hickey A J
Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond 23298-0533.
Pharm Res. 1990 Dec;7(12):1228-33. doi: 10.1023/a:1015973402316.
Pressurized metered dose inhaler (MDI) output from three different albuterol formulations was characterized using three inertial separation devices. Results were compared for the Delron six-stage cascade impactor (DC16), the Andersen Mark II eight-stage impactor (AC18), and Copley's twin-stage liquid impinger (LI). None of the devices tested in this study was ideal in all respects. All devices could differentiate between formulations in terms of respirable doses (albuterol amount with aerodynamic diameters less than 5.5 through 6.4 microns). Only the high-flow rate LI could differentiate among all three formulations when data were presented in terms of respirable percentage (RP) of drug collected. Values for RP were in excellent agreement for the independently calibrated impactors when the same evaporation chamber was used atop the impactors. The LI appeared to overestimate values for RP in vivo. Results are discussed in light of the debate surrounding the revision of USP aerosol testing requirements. Rigorous specifications for evaporation chambers and methodologies are necessary for meaningful inter- and intra-laboratory comparison of results when any of these devices are used.
使用三种惯性分离装置对三种不同沙丁胺醇制剂的压力定量吸入器(MDI)输出进行了表征。比较了Delron六级串联撞击器(DC16)、Andersen Mark II八级撞击器(AC18)和Copley双级液体冲击器(LI)的结果。本研究中测试的所有装置在各方面都并非理想。所有装置在可吸入剂量(空气动力学直径小于5.5至6.4微米的沙丁胺醇量)方面都能区分不同制剂。当以收集药物的可吸入百分比(RP)呈现数据时,只有高流速LI能够区分所有三种制剂。当在撞击器顶部使用相同的蒸发室时,独立校准的撞击器的RP值非常一致。LI在体内似乎高估了RP值。结合围绕USP气雾剂测试要求修订的争论对结果进行了讨论。当使用这些装置中的任何一种时,为了在实验室间和实验室内进行有意义的结果比较,对蒸发室和方法学进行严格规范是必要的。