Doorenspleet Karlijn, Mailli Amalia Aikaterini, van der Hoorn Berry B, Beentjes Kevin K, De Backer Annelies, Derycke Sofie, Murk Albertinka J, Reiss Henning, Nijland Reindert
Marine Animal Ecology, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Faculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, Nord University, Bodø, Norway.
PeerJ. 2025 Apr 14;13:e19158. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19158. eCollection 2025.
DNA-based methods and developments of sequencing technologies are integral to macrobenthos biodiversity studies, and their implementation as standardized monitoring methods is approaching. Evaluating the efficacy and reliability of these technological developments is crucial for macrobenthos biodiversity assessments. In this study, we compared three DNA-based techniques for assessing the diversity of bulk macrobenthos samples from the Belgian North Sea. Specifically, we compared amplicon sequencing using Illumina MiSeq and portable real-time sequencing of Oxford Nanopore shotgun sequencing using Illumina NovaSeq sequencing. The 313 bp mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) metabarcoding fragment served as the target region for the metabarcoding analysis. Our results indicate that Oxford Nanopore and MiSeq metabarcoding had similar performances in terms of alpha and beta diversity, revealing highly similar location-specific community compositions. The NovaSeq metagenomics method also resulted in similar alpha diversity, but slightly different community compositions compared to the metabarcoding approach. Despite these differences, location-specific community compositions were maintained across all platforms. Notably, read counts from the NovaSeq metagenomic analysis showed the weakest correlation to size corrected morphological abundance and there were mismatches between morphological identification and all DNA based findings which are likely caused by a combination of factors such as primer efficiency and an incomplete reference database. Our findings underscore the critical importance of database completeness prior to implementing DNA-based techniques as standardized monitoring method, especially for metagenomics. Nevertheless, our findings emphasize that Oxford Nanopore metabarcoding proves to be a viable alternative to the conventional Illumina MiSeq metabarcoding platform for macrobenthos biodiversity monitoring.
基于DNA的方法和测序技术的发展是大型底栖生物多样性研究不可或缺的一部分,并且它们作为标准化监测方法的应用正在逐步实现。评估这些技术发展的有效性和可靠性对于大型底栖生物多样性评估至关重要。在本研究中,我们比较了三种基于DNA的技术,用于评估来自比利时北海的大型底栖生物样本的多样性。具体而言,我们比较了使用Illumina MiSeq的扩增子测序、牛津纳米孔的便携式实时测序以及使用Illumina NovaSeq测序的鸟枪法测序。313 bp的线粒体细胞色素c氧化酶亚基I(COI)元条形码片段用作元条形码分析的目标区域。我们的结果表明,牛津纳米孔和MiSeq元条形码在α和β多样性方面具有相似的表现,揭示了高度相似的特定位置群落组成。NovaSeq宏基因组学方法也产生了相似的α多样性,但与元条形码方法相比,群落组成略有不同。尽管存在这些差异,但所有平台上特定位置的群落组成保持不变。值得注意的是,NovaSeq宏基因组分析的读数计数与大小校正后的形态丰度的相关性最弱,并且形态鉴定与所有基于DNA的结果之间存在不匹配,这可能是由引物效率和不完整的参考数据库等多种因素共同导致的。我们的研究结果强调了在将基于DNA的技术作为标准化监测方法实施之前,数据库完整性的至关重要性,特别是对于宏基因组学。尽管如此,我们的研究结果强调,牛津纳米孔元条形码被证明是用于大型底栖生物多样性监测的传统Illumina MiSeq元条形码平台的可行替代方案。