Suppr超能文献

欧盟的吸烟流行率:国家和跨国流行率调查方法和结果的比较。

Smoking prevalence in the European Union: a comparison of national and transnational prevalence survey methods and results.

机构信息

UK Centre for Tobacco Control Studies, University of Nottingham, Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, Clinical Sciences Building, City Hospital, Nottingham NG51PB, UK.

出版信息

Tob Control. 2011 Jan;20(1):e4. doi: 10.1136/tc.2010.036103. Epub 2010 Oct 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the European Commission Eurobarometer survey of 27 European Union (EU) member states produces reliable smoking prevalence estimates when compared to national prevalence survey data, and to identify approaches to standardising the measurement of smoking prevalence in the EU.

METHODS

This was a direct comparison of questions, sampling methods and smoking prevalence estimates, between the 2006 Eurobarometer study and contemporaneous national surveys. All 27 EU member states were included. Participants were people surveyed in the 2006 Eurobarometer study and in various national surveys in the closest year to 2006 for which data were available. The main outcome measures were the mean and range of differences in prevalence estimates between the Eurobarometer and national surveys.

RESULTS

Most national surveys used similar multistage sampling methods and involved sample sizes of 3000 or more, but the phrasing of the questions used to define smoking, the inclusion or exclusion of occasional smokers, the age ranges of participants and the frequency of national surveys varied substantially between countries. The Eurobarometer study used the same questions in all countries but in sample sizes of 1000, or in 3 countries, 500. Eurobarometer 2006 smoking prevalence estimates were on average 0.37 percentage points higher than those in national surveys, but with a 95% range from -10.49 to +11.23 percentage points. At the extremes, the equivalent national prevalence estimate for Slovakia was 13.0% higher and for the UK 10.0% lower than the Eurobarometer figure.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurements of the prevalence of smoking, the biggest avoidable public health threat in the European Union, are highly discrepant within countries between national and European Commission survey estimates. Monitoring national smoking prevalence on a regular basis, using standardised methods in representative population samples, is an urgent priority for the EU.

摘要

目的

比较欧盟 27 个成员国的欧洲民意调查委员会(Eurobarometer)调查与国家流行率调查数据,确定其能否提供可靠的吸烟流行率估算值,并确定在欧盟内标准化吸烟流行率测量的方法。

方法

这是对 2006 年欧洲民意调查委员会研究与同期国家调查中问题、抽样方法和吸烟流行率估算值的直接比较。纳入了所有 27 个欧盟成员国。参与者为 2006 年欧洲民意调查委员会研究和 2006 年前后年份中可获得数据的各种国家调查中接受调查的人群。主要结局测量指标为欧洲民意调查委员会与国家调查间流行率估算值的差异的平均值和范围。

结果

大多数国家调查使用了类似的多阶段抽样方法,样本量均超过 3000 人,但用于界定吸烟的问题表述、是否包括偶尔吸烟者、参与者的年龄范围以及国家调查的频率在国家间存在显著差异。欧洲民意调查委员会研究在所有国家使用相同的问题,但样本量为 1000 人,或在 3 个国家中为 500 人。2006 年欧洲民意调查委员会的吸烟流行率估算值平均比国家调查高 0.37 个百分点,但 95%范围为-10.49 至+11.23 个百分点。在极端情况下,斯洛伐克的国家流行率估算值比欧洲民意调查委员会数据高 13.0%,英国低 10.0%。

结论

在欧盟内,国家和欧洲民意调查委员会调查估计值之间,吸烟流行率(欧盟最大的可避免的公共卫生威胁)的测量结果在国家内存在高度差异。定期使用代表性人群样本的标准化方法监测国家吸烟流行率是欧盟的当务之急。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24fc/3003865/d34ba67eb6e1/tobaccocontrol36103fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验