Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Unit of Lung Toxicology, KULeuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Environ Health. 2010 Oct 25;9:64. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-9-64.
Numerous epidemiological studies have demonstrated adverse health effects of a sedentary life style, on the one hand, and of acute and chronic exposure to traffic-related air pollution, on the other. Because physical exercise augments the amount of inhaled pollutants, it is not clear whether cycling to work in a polluted urban environment should be encouraged or not. To address this conundrum we investigated if a bicycle journey along a busy commuting road would induce changes in biomarkers of pulmonary and systematic inflammation in a group of healthy subjects.
38 volunteers (mean age: 43 ± 8.6 years, 26% women) cycled for about 20 minutes in real traffic near a major bypass road (road test; mean UFP exposure: 28,867 particles per cm3) in Antwerp and in a laboratory with filtered air (clean room; mean UFP exposure: 496 particles per cm3). The exercise intensity (heart rate) and duration of cycling were similar for each volunteer in both experiments. Exhaled nitric oxide (NO), plasma interleukin-6 (IL-6), platelet function, Clara cell protein in serum and blood cell counts were measured before and 30 minutes after exercise.
Percentage of blood neutrophils increased significantly more (p = 0.004) after exercise in the road test (3.9%; 95% CI: 1.5 to 6.2%; p = 0.003) than after exercise in the clean room (0.2%; 95% CI: -1.8 to 2.2%, p = 0.83). The pre/post-cycling changes in exhaled NO, plasma IL-6, platelet function, serum levels of Clara cell protein and number of total blood leukocytes did not differ significantly between the two scenarios.
Traffic-related exposure to particles during exercise caused a small increase in the distribution of inflammatory blood cells in healthy subjects. The health significance of this isolated change is unclear.
大量的流行病学研究表明,一方面,久坐的生活方式对健康有不良影响,另一方面,急性和慢性接触交通相关的空气污染也有不良影响。由于体育锻炼会增加吸入污染物的量,因此尚不清楚在污染严重的城市环境中骑车上班是否应该鼓励。为了解决这个难题,我们研究了在一组健康受试者中,沿着繁忙的通勤道路骑自行车是否会引起肺部和全身炎症生物标志物的变化。
38 名志愿者(平均年龄:43 ± 8.6 岁,26%为女性)在安特卫普的一条主要旁路(道路测试;平均 UFP 暴露:28867 个颗粒/立方厘米)和一个装有过滤空气的实验室(清洁室;平均 UFP 暴露:496 个颗粒/立方厘米)中进行约 20 分钟的实际交通骑行。每个志愿者在两次实验中的运动强度(心率)和骑行时间都相似。在运动前后分别测量了呼气一氧化氮(NO)、血浆白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、血小板功能、血清克拉拉细胞蛋白和血细胞计数。
在道路测试中,运动后血液中性粒细胞的百分比增加(p = 0.004)更为显著(增加 3.9%;95%CI:1.5 至 6.2%;p = 0.003),而在清洁室中,运动后增加(0.2%;95%CI:-1.8 至 2.2%,p = 0.83)。两次实验中,呼气 NO、血浆 IL-6、血小板功能、血清克拉拉细胞蛋白水平和总白细胞数的骑行前后变化无显著差异。
在运动过程中接触交通相关的颗粒会导致健康受试者血液中炎症细胞的分布略有增加。这种孤立的变化的健康意义尚不清楚。