van Sittert N J, Dumas E P
Shell International Petroleum Maatschappij, B.V., Health Safety and Environment Division, Hague, The Netherlands.
Med Lav. 1990 Nov-Dec;81(6):463-73.
To support the continued use and the registration of monocrotophos, a field study was conducted at Calauan, Laguna, The Philippines, to assess exposure and the resulting health risk to 21 spraymen applying monocrotophos to rice crop by knapsack spraying during 3 consecutive days. The findings of the study were as follows: exposure of uncovered hands and of the skin of the back to the concentrate was visually observed during the filling, and respectively loading operations; During spraying exposure from airborne diluted formulation occurred; in addition contamination of the lower parts of the body took place because of direct contact with the sprayed crop; Determination of the amount of the urinary metabolite dimethylphosphate excreted in 24 hours urine samples demonstrated absorption of monocrotophos into the body of the spraymen. The half-life of elimination of the urinary metabolite from the body was on average 18 hours; No clinically significant inhibitions of whole blood or red blood cell cholinesterase activities were found, i.e., 30% below baseline values. However, 8 of 21 spraymen had plasma cholinesterase levels below 50% of baseline values;--No acute adverse health effects associated with the application of monocrotophos were observed, which was in accordance with the absence of clinically significant cholinesterase depressions. The conclusion of the study was that the use of monocrotophos under prevailing typical conditions in the Philippines, which varies from a frequency of one application per season to a maximum of 3 applications each on 3 consecutive days per week, and where label safety instructions are not necessarily observed, is not expected to pose an acute health risk under the prevailing conditions and practices, which includes filling, spraying and cleaning activities. From the experience in this study it is clear that proper spraying technique and adequate use of personal protection will significantly reduce exposure. As such a reduction is highly recommendable, advice on proper spray procedures and adequate personal protection has been reinforced.
为支持久效磷的持续使用和登记,在菲律宾拉古纳省卡拉万开展了一项田间研究,以评估21名喷雾人员在连续3天使用背负式喷雾器向稻田喷洒久效磷时的接触情况及由此产生的健康风险。该研究结果如下:在灌装和分别装载操作过程中,肉眼观察到未覆盖的手部和背部皮肤接触到了浓缩液;在喷雾过程中,接触到了空气中的稀释制剂;此外,由于直接接触喷洒过的作物,身体下部受到了污染;对24小时尿液样本中排泄的尿代谢物二甲基磷酸酯量的测定表明久效磷被吸收进了喷雾人员体内。尿代谢物从体内消除的半衰期平均为18小时;未发现全血或红细胞胆碱酯酶活性有临床显著抑制,即低于基线值30%。然而,21名喷雾人员中有8人的血浆胆碱酯酶水平低于基线值的50%;未观察到与久效磷施用相关的急性不良健康影响,这与没有临床显著的胆碱酯酶降低情况一致。该研究的结论是,在菲律宾普遍存在的典型条件下使用久效磷(从每季施用一次到每周连续3天最多施用3次,且不一定遵守标签安全说明),在当前条件和操作(包括灌装、喷雾和清洁活动)下预计不会造成急性健康风险。从本研究的经验来看,很明显正确的喷雾技术和充分使用个人防护用品将显著减少接触。鉴于这种减少非常值得推荐,已加强了关于正确喷雾程序和充分个人防护的建议。