Waddell C A, Rollason T P, Amarilli J M, Cullimore J, McConkey C C
Birmingham Maternity Hospital, Pathology Department, Edgbaston.
Cytopathology. 1990;1(3):171-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.1990.tb00343.x.
The performance of a new ectocervical brush sampler--the Cervex--was compared with the Ayre spatula in 280 paired cervical smears. The Cervex smears were superior in quality of spread, transformation zone sampling in all degrees of cervical patency and in detection of histologically proven epithelial abnormalities, with a false negative rate of 10.9% compared with 20% for the Ayre. Improvement in predictive value was noted in atrophic samples, with increased cellularity and transformation zone representation. Difficulty has been encountered in obtaining adequate samples from the older woman and from those with iatrogenic scarring of the cervix. Although two-sampler techniques may be used, submission of high quality pan-cervical material from a single sampler onto one slide is economically and organizationally attractive. The Cervex seems capable of producing such samples and deserves further evaluation for routine screening.
在280对宫颈涂片样本中,对一种新型宫颈外口刷式采样器——Cervex采样器与艾尔刮板的性能进行了比较。Cervex涂片在涂片质量、各种宫颈通畅程度下转化区的采样以及组织学证实的上皮异常的检测方面均更具优势,其假阴性率为10.9%,而艾尔刮板为20%。在萎缩性样本中观察到预测价值有所提高,细胞数量增加且转化区代表性增强。从老年女性以及宫颈有医源性瘢痕的女性中获取足够样本存在困难。尽管可以使用双采样技术,但从单一采样器将高质量的全宫颈材料提交到一张载玻片上在经济和组织方面具有吸引力。Cervex似乎能够产生这样的样本,值得在常规筛查中进一步评估。