• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[《利兹修订版痤疮分级量表》西班牙语版本的可行性与可靠性]

[Feasibility and reliability of the Spanish version of the Leeds Revised Acne Grading Scale].

作者信息

Guerra-Tapia A, Puig-Sanz L, Conejo Mir J, Toribio-Pérez J, Iglesias C, Zsolt I

机构信息

Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, España.

出版信息

Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2010 Nov;101(9):778-84.

PMID:21034708
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although there are more than 25 acne grading systems, there is no consensus on which is most appropriate. Unification of the classifications is recommended in order to facilitate therapeutic decisions.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility and reliability of the Spanish version of the Leeds revised acne grading (LRAG) scale in patients with acne vulgaris in Spain.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective, multicenter, observational study in Spain, including patients with acne affecting at least 1 of 3 regions: face, back, or chest. Patients were assessed using the LRAG scale and lesion counting. Changes in the scores were determined at 4-6 weeks, and were correlated with the lesion count. Physicians were asked 4 questions regarding difficulty using the scale and the time employed.

RESULTS

A total of 259 sites of acne were assessed in 239 patients at 57 centers. The majority of physicians (89.5%) stated that the LRAG scale was not difficult to use. The mean administration time was 3.12min. Cross-sectional validity (P<.012 for the face, P<.001 for the back and chest), longitudinal validity (P<.0001 for the face, back, and chest), and intraobserver and interobserver reliability (Cronbach α >0.8) were significant for inflammatory lesions in all regions. Sensitivity to change was demonstrated for lesions in all regions, based on the correlation between the difference in severity and the number of lesions recorded by the LRAG, and the difference in the lesion count between baseline and follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The Spanish version of the LRAG scale is a practical and reliable tool and is sensitive to change. It is a valid tool for the objective assessment of the severity of acne.

摘要

背景

尽管有超过25种痤疮分级系统,但对于哪种最为合适尚无共识。建议统一分类以促进治疗决策。

目的

评估西班牙版利兹修订痤疮分级(LRAG)量表在西班牙寻常痤疮患者中的可行性和可靠性。

患者与方法

我们在西班牙进行了一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究,纳入痤疮累及面部、背部或胸部这3个区域中至少1个区域的患者。使用LRAG量表和皮损计数对患者进行评估。在4 - 6周时确定评分变化,并与皮损计数相关联。就使用该量表的难度和所花费时间向医生询问了4个问题。

结果

在57个中心的239例患者中,共评估了259处痤疮部位。大多数医生(89.5%)表示LRAG量表不难使用。平均使用时间为3.12分钟。所有区域炎性皮损的横断面效度(面部P<0.012,背部和胸部P<0.001)、纵向效度(面部、背部和胸部P<0.0001)以及观察者内和观察者间信度(Cronbach α>0.8)均显著。基于LRAG记录的严重程度差异与皮损数量之间的相关性以及基线和随访之间的皮损计数差异,所有区域的皮损均显示出对变化的敏感性。

结论

西班牙版LRAG量表是一种实用且可靠的工具,对变化敏感。它是客观评估痤疮严重程度的有效工具。

相似文献

1
[Feasibility and reliability of the Spanish version of the Leeds Revised Acne Grading Scale].[《利兹修订版痤疮分级量表》西班牙语版本的可行性与可靠性]
Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2010 Nov;101(9):778-84.
2
Validation of the Spanish Acne Severity Scale (Escala de Gravedad del Acné Española--EGAE).验证西班牙痤疮严重程度评分(Escala de Gravedad del Acné Española--EGAE)。
Eur J Dermatol. 2013 Apr 1;23(2):233-40. doi: 10.1684/ejd.2013.2003.
3
ECCA grading scale: an original validated acne scar grading scale for clinical practice in dermatology.ECCA分级量表:一种经验证的用于皮肤科临床实践的痤疮瘢痕原始分级量表。
Dermatology. 2007;214(1):46-51. doi: 10.1159/000096912.
4
A comparison of current acne grading systems and proposal of a novel system.当前痤疮分级系统的比较及一种新系统的提议。
Int J Dermatol. 1997 Jun;36(6):416-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-4362.1997.00099.x.
5
Correlation of photographic images from the Leeds revised acne grading system with a six-category global acne severity scale.利兹痤疮分级系统摄影图像与六类全球痤疮严重程度分级的相关性。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013 Mar;27(3):e414-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2012.04692.x. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
6
Inter-observer agreement on acne severity based on facial photographs.基于面部照片的痤疮严重程度的观察者间一致性。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010 Feb;24(2):196-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03278.x. Epub 2009 May 27.
7
Development and validation of a comprehensive acne severity scale.一种综合性痤疮严重程度量表的开发与验证
J Cutan Med Surg. 2007 Nov-Dec;11(6):211-6. doi: 10.2310/7750.2007.00037.
8
Blue light phototherapy in the treatment of acne.蓝光光疗治疗痤疮
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2004 Oct;20(5):266-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0781.2004.00109.x.
9
Photopneumatic therapy for the treatment of acne.光气动疗法治疗痤疮
J Drugs Dermatol. 2009 Mar;8(3):239-41.
10
A closer look at truncal acne vulgaris: prevalence, severity, and clinical significance.寻常性躯干痤疮的深入观察:患病率、严重程度及临床意义
J Drugs Dermatol. 2007 Jun;6(6):597-600.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comprehensive Critique and Review of Published Measures of Acne Severity.已发表的痤疮严重程度测量方法的全面批判与综述
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2016 Jul;9(7):40-52. Epub 2016 Jul 1.