Suppr超能文献

血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂相关性咳嗽:《医师案头参考》中的误导性信息。

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor associated cough: deceptive information from the Physicians' Desk Reference.

机构信息

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Med. 2010 Nov;123(11):1016-30. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.06.014.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dry cough is a common, annoying adverse effect of all angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. The present study was designed to compare the rate of coughs reported in the literature with reported rates in the Physicians' Desk Reference (PDR)/drug label.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE/EMBASE/CENTRAL for articles published from 1990 to the present about randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of ACE inhibitors with a sample size of at least 100 patients in the ACE inhibitors arm with follow-up for at least 3 months and reporting the incidence or withdrawal rates due to cough. Baseline characteristics, cohort enrolled, metrics used to assess cough, incidence, and withdrawal rates due to cough were abstracted.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-five studies that satisfied our inclusion criteria enrolled 198,130 patients. The pooled weighted incidence of cough for enalapril was 11.48% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.54% to 13.41%), which was ninefold greater compared to the reported rate in the PDR/drug label (1.3%). The pooled weighted withdrawal rate due to cough for enalapril was 2.57% (95% CI, 2.40-2.74), which was 31-fold greater compared to the reported rate in the PDR/drug label (0.1%). The incidence of cough has increased progressively over the last 2 decades with accumulating data, but it has been reported consistently several-fold less in the PDR compared to the RCTs. The results were similar for most other ACE inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of ACE inhibitor-associated cough and the withdrawal rate (the more objective metric) due to cough is significantly greater in the literature than reported in the PDR/drug label and is likely to be even greater in the real world when compared with the data from RCTs. There exists a gap between the data available from the literature and that which is presented to the consumers (prescribing physicians and patients).

摘要

背景

干咳是所有血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂常见且令人困扰的不良反应。本研究旨在比较文献中报告的咳嗽发生率与《医师案头参考》(PDR)/药物标签中报告的发生率。

方法

我们检索了 MEDLINE/EMBASE/CENTRAL 数据库,以获取自 1990 年至今发表的关于 ACE 抑制剂的随机临床试验(RCT)的文章,这些 RCT 的 ACE 抑制剂组样本量至少为 100 例,随访时间至少为 3 个月,并报告了因咳嗽而发生或停药的发生率。我们提取了基线特征、纳入的队列、用于评估咳嗽的指标、咳嗽发生率和因咳嗽而停药的发生率。

结果

符合纳入标准的 125 项研究共纳入了 198130 例患者。依那普利的咳嗽总发生率为 11.48%(95%置信区间[CI],9.54%至 13.41%),是 PDR/药物标签中报告发生率(1.3%)的 9 倍。依那普利因咳嗽而停药的总发生率为 2.57%(95%CI,2.40%至 2.74%),是 PDR/药物标签中报告发生率(0.1%)的 31 倍。过去 20 年来,随着数据的积累,ACE 抑制剂相关咳嗽的发生率呈逐渐上升趋势,但与 RCT 相比,PDR 报告的咳嗽发生率却始终低几个数量级。对于大多数其他 ACE 抑制剂,结果也类似。

结论

文献中报告的 ACE 抑制剂相关咳嗽发生率和因咳嗽而停药的发生率(更客观的指标)显著高于 PDR/药物标签中报告的发生率,与 RCT 数据相比,在真实世界中可能更高。文献中提供的数据与向消费者(处方医生和患者)提供的数据之间存在差距。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验