Department of Geography, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA. atatem@ufl .edu
Lancet. 2010 Nov 6;376(9752):1579-91. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61301-3. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
Experience gained from the Global Malaria Eradication Program (1955-72) identified a set of shared technical and operational factors that enabled some countries to successfully eliminate malaria. Spatial data for these factors were assembled for all malaria-endemic countries and combined to provide an objective, relative ranking of countries by technical, operational, and combined elimination feasibility. The analysis was done separately for Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax, and the limitations of the approach were discussed. The relative rankings suggested that malaria elimination would be most feasible in countries in the Americas and Asia, and least feasible in countries in central and west Africa. The results differed when feasibility was measured by technical or operational factors, highlighting the different types of challenge faced by each country. The results are not intended to be prescriptive, predictive, or to provide absolute assessments of feasibility, but they do show that spatial information is available to facilitate evidence-based assessments of the relative feasibility of malaria elimination by country that can be rapidly updated.
从全球疟疾根除计划(1955-1972 年)中获得的经验确定了一系列共同的技术和运营因素,这些因素使一些国家能够成功消除疟疾。为所有疟疾流行国家收集了这些因素的空间数据,并将其组合起来,根据技术、运营和综合消除可行性对各国进行客观的相对排名。分别对恶性疟原虫和间日疟原虫进行了分析,并讨论了该方法的局限性。分析结果表明,在美洲和亚洲国家消除疟疾的可行性最高,在中部和西部非洲国家消除疟疾的可行性最低。当以技术或运营因素来衡量可行性时,结果会有所不同,这突出了每个国家所面临的不同类型的挑战。这些结果并非旨在具有规定性、预测性或提供可行性的绝对评估,但它们确实表明,可利用空间信息来促进基于证据的国家消除疟疾相对可行性评估,且该评估可以快速更新。