School of Health Science, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Lund University, Sweden.
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2011 Sep;8(3):128-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2010.00203.x. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
Sleep disturbances are common problems among individuals in hospitals and institutions. Although several studies have explored this phenomenon, there is still a lack of knowledge about the effectiveness of sleep-promoting nursing interventions. This systematic review aims to describe and evaluate the effectiveness of sleep-promoting nursing interventions in health care settings.
A systematic review was performed. In June 2009, a literature search was carried out in the following databases: Academic Search Elite, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library and MedLine/PubMed. Fifty-two references were identified and after critical appraisal, nine studies were selected. A compilation of the results and the outcomes of the interventions were carried out. Furthermore, the evidence strength of the interventions was assessed.
Little evidence for the nursing interventions, sleep hygiene, music, natural sound and vision, stimulation of acupoints, relaxation, massage and aromatherapy is found. However, large effect size of interventions were found when using massage, acupuncture and music, natural sounds or music videos. The use of sleep hygiene and relaxation, on the other hand, produced only small effects.
The lack of high evidence strength for the nursing interventions together with the uncertainty about their effects calls for more research before implementing these interventions into clinical practice.
睡眠障碍在医院和医疗机构的个体中很常见。尽管有几项研究探讨了这一现象,但对于促进睡眠的护理干预的有效性仍缺乏了解。本系统评价旨在描述和评估促进护理干预在保健环境中的有效性。
进行了系统评价。2009 年 6 月,在以下数据库中进行了文献检索:学术搜索精英、CINAHL、Cochrane 图书馆和 MedLine/PubMed。确定了 52 个参考资料,并经过严格评估,选择了 9 项研究。对结果和干预措施的结果进行了汇编。此外,还评估了干预措施的证据强度。
对于护理干预、睡眠卫生、音乐、自然声音和视觉、穴位刺激、放松、按摩和芳香疗法,证据很少。然而,当使用按摩、针灸和音乐、自然声音或音乐视频时,干预措施的效果很大。另一方面,使用睡眠卫生和放松只产生了较小的效果。
由于缺乏对护理干预的高证据强度,以及对其效果的不确定性,在将这些干预措施应用于临床实践之前,需要进行更多的研究。