Suppr超能文献

两人谈判博弈中策略类型的神经特征。

Neural signatures of strategic types in a two-person bargaining game.

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Nov 16;107(46):19720-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1009625107. Epub 2010 Nov 1.

Abstract

The management and manipulation of our own social image in the minds of others requires difficult and poorly understood computations. One computation useful in social image management is strategic deception: our ability and willingness to manipulate other people's beliefs about ourselves for gain. We used an interpersonal bargaining game to probe the capacity of players to manage their partner's beliefs about them. This probe parsed the group of subjects into three behavioral types according to their revealed level of strategic deception; these types were also distinguished by neural data measured during the game. The most deceptive subjects emitted behavioral signals that mimicked a more benign behavioral type, and their brains showed differential activation in right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and left Brodmann area 10 at the time of this deception. In addition, strategic types showed a significant correlation between activation in the right temporoparietal junction and expected payoff that was absent in the other groups. The neurobehavioral types identified by the game raise the possibility of identifying quantitative biomarkers for the capacity to manipulate and maintain a social image in another person's mind.

摘要

在他人心目中管理和操纵我们自己的社交形象需要进行困难且理解不深的计算。社交形象管理中一个有用的计算是策略性欺骗:我们为了获得利益而操纵他人对自己的看法的能力和意愿。我们使用人际讨价还价游戏来探究参与者管理其伙伴对他们的看法的能力。这个探测根据参与者表现出的策略性欺骗程度,将受试者群体分为三种行为类型;这些类型也通过游戏过程中测量的神经数据进行区分。最具欺骗性的受试者发出的行为信号模仿了更为良性的行为类型,而他们的大脑在进行欺骗时右侧背外侧前额叶皮层和左侧布罗德曼 10 区显示出不同的激活。此外,策略类型在右侧颞顶联合区的激活与预期收益之间存在显著相关性,而其他组则不存在这种相关性。游戏中确定的神经行为类型使得识别在他人心目中操纵和维持社交形象的能力的定量生物标志物成为可能。

相似文献

1
Neural signatures of strategic types in a two-person bargaining game.两人谈判博弈中策略类型的神经特征。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Nov 16;107(46):19720-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1009625107. Epub 2010 Nov 1.
6
Neural correlates of fair behavior in interpersonal bargaining.人际讨价还价中公平行为的神经相关物。
Soc Neurosci. 2012;7(5):537-51. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2012.674056. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
10
Decoding fairness motivations from multivariate brain activity patterns.从多元脑活动模式中解码公平动机。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2019 Nov 1;14(11):1197-1207. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsz097.

引用本文的文献

2
Neural impacts of personality on deception for applications of deception detection.个性对欺骗行为的神经影响在欺骗检测中的应用。
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2024 Oct-Dec;24(4):100511. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2024.100511. Epub 2024 Oct 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Reputation management in the age of the world-wide web.网络时代的声誉管理。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Nov;14(11):482-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.07.003. Epub 2010 Aug 3.
2
Cooperation and heterogeneity of the autistic mind.自闭症患者心智的合作与异质性。
J Neurosci. 2010 Jun 30;30(26):8815-8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0400-10.2010.
3
4
Neural correlates of depth of strategic reasoning in medial prefrontal cortex.内侧前额叶皮质中策略推理深度的神经关联
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 9;106(23):9163-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0807721106. Epub 2009 May 22.
7
Associative learning of social value.社会价值的联想学习
Nature. 2008 Nov 13;456(7219):245-9. doi: 10.1038/nature07538.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验