Piracicaba Dental School, Universidade Estadual de Campinas.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2004 Sep;12(3):219-22. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572004000300011.
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the microleakage at the composite-repair interface using different bonding systems. Composite resin specimens (Filtek Z250 - 3M-ESPE) were divided into five groups (n=20) according to the following bonding mechanism: C - control - etching with 35% phosphoric acid; SB1 - etching and application of one coat of Single Bond (3M-ESPE); SB2 - etching and application of two coats of Single Bond (3M-ESPE); SMP1 - etching, application of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose primer (3M-ESPE) followed by the adhesive and, SMP2 - etching, application of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose adhesive (3M-ESPE) without the primer. Thereafter, all groups received new resin application. Samples were thermocycled (500 cycles / 5ºC - 55ºC [±2]) and immersed for 4h in 2% methylene blue buffered dye solution (7.0 pH). Three examiners measured the extent of microleakage in a stereoscope microscope, using four representative scores. For all experimental groups, no significant difference in microleakage at the repair was identified by Kruskal-Wallis test (p > 0.05). Therefore, different types of bonding systems presented the same effect on the dye penetration along the repair interface.
本研究的目的是评估不同粘接系统在复合修复界面的微渗漏。复合树脂试件(Filtek Z250 - 3M-ESPE)根据以下粘接机制分为五组(n=20):C - 对照 - 用 35%磷酸酸蚀;SB1 - 酸蚀和单层 Bond(3M-ESPE)的应用;SB2 - 酸蚀和双层 Bond(3M-ESPE)的应用;SMP1 - 酸蚀, Scotchbond 多用途底漆(3M-ESPE)的应用,随后是粘合剂,SMP2 - 酸蚀, Scotchbond 多用途粘合剂(3M-ESPE)的应用,无底漆。然后,所有组均接受新的树脂应用。样品经过热循环(500 次循环/5°C-55°C[±2])并在 2%亚甲蓝缓冲染料溶液(7.0 pH)中浸泡 4 小时。三位检查者在立体显微镜下用四个代表性分数测量修复处的微渗漏程度。对于所有实验组,Kruskal-Wallis 检验(p>0.05)未发现修复处微渗漏的显著差异。因此,不同类型的粘接系统在染料沿修复界面渗透方面具有相同的效果。