Department of Radiology and Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Parma, Italy.
Heart. 2010 Dec;96(24):1973-9. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2009.191361. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
To evaluate diagnostic accuracy of exercise ECG (ex-ECG) versus 64-slice CT coronary angiography (CT-CA) for the detection of significant coronary artery stenosis in a population with low-to-intermediate pre-test likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD).
Retrospective single centre.
Tertiary academic hospital.
177 consecutive patients (88 men, 89 women, mean age 53.5±7.6 years) with chest pain and low-to-intermediate pre-test likelihood of CAD were retrospectively enrolled.
All patients underwent ex-ECG, CT-CA and invasive coronary angiography (ICA).
A lumen diameter reduction of ≥50% was considered as significant stenosis for CT-CA. Ex-ECG was classified as positive, negative or non-diagnostic.
were compared with ICA. Diagnostic accuracy of CT-CA and ex-ECG was calculated using ICA as the reference standard. A parallel comparative analysis using a cut-off value of 70% for significant lumen reduction was also performed too. Results ICA disclosed an absence of significant stenosis (≥50% luminal narrowing) in 85.3% (151/177) patients, single-vessel disease in 9.0% (16/177) patients and multivessel disease in 5.6% (10/177) patients. Prevalence of obstructive disease at ICA was 14.7% (26/177). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values at the patient level were 100.0%, 98.7%, 92.9%, 100%, respectively, for CT-CA and 46.2%, 16.6%, 8.7%, 64.1%, respectively, for ex-ECG. Agreement between CT-CA and ex-ECG was 20.9%. CT-CA performed equally well in men and women, while ex-ECG had a better performance in men. After considering the cut-off value of 70% for significant stenosis, the difference between CT-CA and ex-ECG remained significant (p<0.01), with a low agreement (21.5%).
CT-CA provides optimal diagnostic performance in patients with atypical chest pain and low-to-intermediate risk of CAD. Ex-ECG has poor diagnostic accuracy in this population. Concerns are related to risk of radiation dose versus the benefits of correct disease stratification.
评估运动心电图(ex-ECG)与 64 层 CT 冠状动脉造影(CT-CA)在低至中度冠心病(CAD)患病可能性的人群中检测显著冠状动脉狭窄的诊断准确性。
回顾性单中心研究。
三级学术医院。
177 例连续胸痛且低至中度 CAD 患病可能性的患者(88 名男性,89 名女性,平均年龄 53.5±7.6 岁),回顾性入组。
所有患者均接受 ex-ECG、CT-CA 和有创冠状动脉造影(ICA)检查。
以 CT-CA 管腔直径减少≥50%为显著狭窄。ex-ECG 分为阳性、阴性或无法诊断。
与 ICA 进行比较。以 ICA 为参考标准,计算 CT-CA 和 ex-ECG 的诊断准确性。还使用管腔狭窄程度≥70%的截断值进行平行对比分析。结果 ICA 显示 85.3%(151/177)患者无显著狭窄(≥50%管腔狭窄),9.0%(16/177)患者单支血管病变,5.6%(10/177)患者多支血管病变。ICA 处阻塞性疾病的患病率为 14.7%(26/177)。CT-CA 的患者水平的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 100.0%、98.7%、92.9%、100.0%,ex-ECG 分别为 46.2%、16.6%、8.7%、64.1%。CT-CA 与 ex-ECG 之间的一致性为 20.9%。CT-CA 在男性和女性中均表现良好,而 ex-ECG 在男性中表现更好。考虑到显著狭窄的截断值为 70%后,CT-CA 与 ex-ECG 之间的差异仍具有统计学意义(p<0.01),一致性较低(21.5%)。
CT-CA 在有非典型胸痛和低至中度 CAD 患病风险的患者中提供最佳的诊断性能。ex-ECG 在该人群中的诊断准确性较差。问题涉及到放射剂量的风险与正确的疾病分层的获益。