Suppr超能文献

CT 冠状动脉成像与运动心电图在胸痛且低至中度冠状动脉疾病预测概率人群中的应用。

CT coronary angiography and exercise ECG in a population with chest pain and low-to-intermediate pre-test likelihood of coronary artery disease.

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Parma, Italy.

出版信息

Heart. 2010 Dec;96(24):1973-9. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2009.191361. Epub 2010 Nov 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate diagnostic accuracy of exercise ECG (ex-ECG) versus 64-slice CT coronary angiography (CT-CA) for the detection of significant coronary artery stenosis in a population with low-to-intermediate pre-test likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD).

DESIGN

Retrospective single centre.

SETTING

Tertiary academic hospital.

PATIENTS

177 consecutive patients (88 men, 89 women, mean age 53.5±7.6 years) with chest pain and low-to-intermediate pre-test likelihood of CAD were retrospectively enrolled.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients underwent ex-ECG, CT-CA and invasive coronary angiography (ICA).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

A lumen diameter reduction of ≥50% was considered as significant stenosis for CT-CA. Ex-ECG was classified as positive, negative or non-diagnostic.

RESULTS

were compared with ICA. Diagnostic accuracy of CT-CA and ex-ECG was calculated using ICA as the reference standard. A parallel comparative analysis using a cut-off value of 70% for significant lumen reduction was also performed too. Results ICA disclosed an absence of significant stenosis (≥50% luminal narrowing) in 85.3% (151/177) patients, single-vessel disease in 9.0% (16/177) patients and multivessel disease in 5.6% (10/177) patients. Prevalence of obstructive disease at ICA was 14.7% (26/177). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values at the patient level were 100.0%, 98.7%, 92.9%, 100%, respectively, for CT-CA and 46.2%, 16.6%, 8.7%, 64.1%, respectively, for ex-ECG. Agreement between CT-CA and ex-ECG was 20.9%. CT-CA performed equally well in men and women, while ex-ECG had a better performance in men. After considering the cut-off value of 70% for significant stenosis, the difference between CT-CA and ex-ECG remained significant (p<0.01), with a low agreement (21.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

CT-CA provides optimal diagnostic performance in patients with atypical chest pain and low-to-intermediate risk of CAD. Ex-ECG has poor diagnostic accuracy in this population. Concerns are related to risk of radiation dose versus the benefits of correct disease stratification.

摘要

目的

评估运动心电图(ex-ECG)与 64 层 CT 冠状动脉造影(CT-CA)在低至中度冠心病(CAD)患病可能性的人群中检测显著冠状动脉狭窄的诊断准确性。

设计

回顾性单中心研究。

地点

三级学术医院。

患者

177 例连续胸痛且低至中度 CAD 患病可能性的患者(88 名男性,89 名女性,平均年龄 53.5±7.6 岁),回顾性入组。

干预措施

所有患者均接受 ex-ECG、CT-CA 和有创冠状动脉造影(ICA)检查。

主要观察指标

以 CT-CA 管腔直径减少≥50%为显著狭窄。ex-ECG 分为阳性、阴性或无法诊断。

结果

与 ICA 进行比较。以 ICA 为参考标准,计算 CT-CA 和 ex-ECG 的诊断准确性。还使用管腔狭窄程度≥70%的截断值进行平行对比分析。结果 ICA 显示 85.3%(151/177)患者无显著狭窄(≥50%管腔狭窄),9.0%(16/177)患者单支血管病变,5.6%(10/177)患者多支血管病变。ICA 处阻塞性疾病的患病率为 14.7%(26/177)。CT-CA 的患者水平的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 100.0%、98.7%、92.9%、100.0%,ex-ECG 分别为 46.2%、16.6%、8.7%、64.1%。CT-CA 与 ex-ECG 之间的一致性为 20.9%。CT-CA 在男性和女性中均表现良好,而 ex-ECG 在男性中表现更好。考虑到显著狭窄的截断值为 70%后,CT-CA 与 ex-ECG 之间的差异仍具有统计学意义(p<0.01),一致性较低(21.5%)。

结论

CT-CA 在有非典型胸痛和低至中度 CAD 患病风险的患者中提供最佳的诊断性能。ex-ECG 在该人群中的诊断准确性较差。问题涉及到放射剂量的风险与正确的疾病分层的获益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验