• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影术优化人工智能筛查低风险患者侵入性血管造影的诊断率:心脏人工智能随机对照试验方案

Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography to Optimize the Diagnostic Yield of Invasive Angiography for Low-Risk Patients Screened With Artificial Intelligence: Protocol for the CarDIA-AI Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Petch Jeremy, Tabja Bortesi Juan Pablo, Sheth Tej, Natarajan Madhu, Pinilla-Echeverri Natalia, Di Shuang, Bangdiwala Shrikant I, Mosleh Karen, Ibrahim Omar, Bainey Kevin R, Dobranowski Julian, Becerra Maria P, Sonier Katie, Schwalm Jon-David

机构信息

Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 May 21;14:e71726. doi: 10.2196/71726.

DOI:10.2196/71726
PMID:40397500
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12138305/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is the gold standard in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). Being invasive, it carries rare but serious risks including myocardial infarction, stroke, major bleeding, and death. A large proportion of elective outpatients undergoing ICA have nonobstructive CAD, highlighting the suboptimal use of this test. Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) is a noninvasive option that provides similar information with less risk and is recommended as a first-line test for patients with low-to-intermediate risk of CAD. Leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) to appropriately direct patients to ICA or CCTA based on the predicted probability of disease may improve the efficiency and safety of diagnostic pathways.

OBJECTIVE

he CarDIA-AI (Coronary computed tomographic angiography to optimize the Diagnostic yield of Invasive Angiography for low-risk patients screened with Artificial Intelligence) study aims to evaluate whether AI-based risk assessment for obstructive CAD implemented within a centralized triage process can optimize the use of ICA in outpatients referred for nonurgent ICA.

METHODS

CarDIA-AI is a pragmatic, open-label, superior randomized controlled trial involving 2 Canadian cardiac centers. A total of 252 adults referred for elective outpatient ICA will be randomized 1:1 to usual care (directly proceeding to ICA) or to triage using an AI-based decision support tool. The AI-based decision support tool was developed using referral information from over 37,000 patients and uses a light gradient boosting machine model to predict the probability of obstructive CAD based on 42 clinically relevant predictors, including patient referral information, demographic characteristics, risk factors, and medical history. Participants in the intervention arm will have their ICA referral forms and medical charts reviewed, and select details entered into the decision support tool, which recommends CCTA or ICA based on the patient's predicted probability of obstructive CAD. All patients will receive the selected imaging modality within 6 weeks of referral and will be subsequently followed for 90 days. The primary outcome is the proportion of normal or nonobstructive CAD diagnosed via ICA and will be assessed using a 2-sided z test to compare the patients referred for cardiac investigation with normal or nonobstructive CAD diagnosed through ICA between the intervention and control groups. Secondary outcomes include the number of angiograms avoided and the diagnostic yield of ICA.

RESULTS

Recruitment began on January 9, 2025, and is expected to conclude in mid to late 2025. As of April 14, 2025, we have enrolled 81 participants. Data analysis will begin once data collection is completed. We expect to submit the results for publication in 2026.

CONCLUSIONS

CarDIA-AI will be the first randomized controlled trial using AI to optimize patient selection for CCTA versus ICA, potentially improving diagnostic efficiency, avoiding unnecessary complications of ICA, and improving health care resource usage.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06648239; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06648239/.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/71726.

摘要

背景

有创冠状动脉造影术(ICA)是诊断冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的金标准。由于其具有侵入性,虽风险罕见但严重,包括心肌梗死、中风、大出血和死亡。很大一部分接受ICA的择期门诊患者患有非阻塞性CAD,这凸显了该检查的使用不够优化。冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术(CCTA)是一种非侵入性选择,能提供类似信息且风险较低,被推荐作为CAD低至中度风险患者的一线检查。利用人工智能(AI)根据疾病预测概率将患者合理导向ICA或CCTA,可能会提高诊断路径的效率和安全性。

目的

CarDIA-AI(冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术优化人工智能筛查低风险患者侵入性血管造影诊断率)研究旨在评估在集中分诊过程中实施的基于AI的阻塞性CAD风险评估能否优化非紧急ICA转诊门诊患者的ICA使用。

方法

CarDIA-AI是一项务实、开放标签、优效性随机对照试验,涉及2个加拿大心脏中心。总共252名转诊接受择期门诊ICA的成年人将按1:1随机分为常规治疗组(直接进行ICA)或使用基于AI的决策支持工具进行分诊组。基于AI的决策支持工具利用来自超过37000名患者的转诊信息开发,使用轻梯度提升机模型根据42个临床相关预测因素预测阻塞性CAD的概率,这些因素包括患者转诊信息、人口统计学特征、风险因素和病史。干预组的参与者将让其ICA转诊表和病历接受审查,并将选定细节输入决策支持工具,该工具根据患者阻塞性CAD的预测概率推荐CCTA或ICA。所有患者将在转诊后6周内接受选定的成像检查,并随后随访90天。主要结局是通过ICA诊断为正常或非阻塞性CAD的比例,将使用双侧z检验进行评估,以比较干预组和对照组中因心脏检查转诊且通过ICA诊断为正常或非阻塞性CAD的患者。次要结局包括避免的血管造影检查数量和ICA的诊断率。

结果

招募工作于2025年1月9日开始,预计于2025年年中至年末结束。截至2025年4月14日,我们已招募81名参与者。数据收集完成后将开始数据分析。我们预计在2026年提交结果以供发表。

结论

CarDIA-AI将是第一项使用AI优化CCTA与ICA患者选择的随机对照试验,有可能提高诊断效率,避免ICA的不必要并发症,并改善医疗资源利用。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06648239;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06648239/。

国际注册报告识别码(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/71726。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/699a/12138305/9971e05e0cce/resprot_v14i1e71726_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/699a/12138305/b91f1079f979/resprot_v14i1e71726_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/699a/12138305/9971e05e0cce/resprot_v14i1e71726_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/699a/12138305/b91f1079f979/resprot_v14i1e71726_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/699a/12138305/9971e05e0cce/resprot_v14i1e71726_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography to Optimize the Diagnostic Yield of Invasive Angiography for Low-Risk Patients Screened With Artificial Intelligence: Protocol for the CarDIA-AI Randomized Controlled Trial.冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影术优化人工智能筛查低风险患者侵入性血管造影的诊断率:心脏人工智能随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 May 21;14:e71726. doi: 10.2196/71726.
2
Atherosclerosis Imaging Quantitative Computed Tomography (AI-QCT) to guide referral to invasive coronary angiography in the randomized controlled CONSERVE trial.动脉粥样硬化成像定量计算机断层扫描(AI-QCT)指导随机对照 CONSERVE 试验中侵入性冠状动脉造影的转诊。
Clin Cardiol. 2023 May;46(5):477-483. doi: 10.1002/clc.23995. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
3
Selective Referral Using CCTA Versus Direct Referral for Individuals Referred to Invasive Coronary Angiography for Suspected CAD: A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial.采用 CCTA 选择性转诊与直接转诊对疑似 CAD 行有创冠状动脉造影检查的患者进行对比:一项随机、对照、开放标签试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jul;12(7 Pt 2):1303-1312. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.09.018. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
4
Centralized Triage of Suspected Coronary Artery Disease Using Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography to Optimize the Diagnostic Yield of Invasive Angiography.使用冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影对疑似冠状动脉疾病进行集中分诊以优化有创血管造影的诊断率
CJC Open. 2022 Nov 19;5(2):148-157. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2022.10.009. eCollection 2023 Feb.
5
Evaluation of the clinical value of CCTA as the preferred screening method in patients with chronic coronary syndrome.评估冠状动脉CT血管造影(CCTA)作为慢性冠状动脉综合征患者首选筛查方法的临床价值。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Feb 25;25(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04587-x.
6
Impact of machine learning-based coronary computed tomography angiography fractional flow reserve on treatment decisions and clinical outcomes in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.基于机器学习的冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影血流储备分数对疑似冠心病患者治疗决策和临床结局的影响。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Nov;30(11):5841-5851. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06964-w. Epub 2020 May 28.
7
Coronary CTA With AI-QCT Interpretation: Comparison With Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for Detection of Obstructive Stenosis Using Invasive Angiography as Reference Standard.冠状动脉 CTA 结合人工智能-QCT 解读:与心肌灌注成像检测以有创血管造影为参考标准的阻塞性狭窄的比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 Sep;219(3):407-419. doi: 10.2214/AJR.21.27289. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
8
Clinical effectiveness of coronary computed tomographic angiography in the triage of patients to cardiac catheterization and revascularization after inconclusive stress testing: results of a 2-year prospective trial.冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术在对负荷试验结果不明确的患者进行心脏导管插入术和血运重建分流中的临床有效性:一项为期2年的前瞻性试验结果
J Nucl Cardiol. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):701-13. doi: 10.1007/s12350-009-9117-6. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
9
Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive 64-row Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography (CCTA) Compared with Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI): The PICTURE Study, A Prospective Multicenter Trial.与心肌灌注成像(MPI)相比,64排无创计算机断层扫描冠状动脉造影(CCTA)的诊断准确性:PICTURE研究,一项前瞻性多中心试验。
Acad Radiol. 2017 Jan;24(1):22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.09.008. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
10
Danish study of Non-Invasive testing in Coronary Artery Disease (Dan-NICAD): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.丹麦冠状动脉疾病无创检测研究(Dan-NICAD):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 May 26;17(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1388-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of AI in Cardiac CT and MRI: A Scientific Statement from the ESCR, EuSoMII, NASCI, SCCT, SCMR, SIIM, and RSNA.人工智能在心脏CT和MRI中的应用:欧洲心血管研究基金会(ESCR)、欧洲心脏影像学会(EuSoMII)、北美心血管影像学会(NASCI)、心血管计算机断层扫描学会(SCCT)、心血管磁共振学会(SCMR)、美国医学影像学会(SIIM)和北美放射学会(RSNA)的科学声明。
Radiology. 2025 Jan;314(1):e240516. doi: 10.1148/radiol.240516.
2
Prospective Human Validation of Artificial Intelligence Interventions in Cardiology: A Scoping Review.人工智能干预在心脏病学中的前瞻性人体验证:一项范围综述。
JACC Adv. 2024 Aug 28;3(9):101202. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101202. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Accelerated Chest Pain Treatment With Artificial Intelligence-Informed, Risk-Driven Triage.
基于人工智能信息和风险驱动分诊的胸痛加速治疗。
JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Sep 1;184(9):1125-1127. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.3219.
4
Centralized Triage of Suspected Coronary Artery Disease Using Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography to Optimize the Diagnostic Yield of Invasive Angiography.使用冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影对疑似冠状动脉疾病进行集中分诊以优化有创血管造影的诊断率
CJC Open. 2022 Nov 19;5(2):148-157. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2022.10.009. eCollection 2023 Feb.
5
Implementation of an All-Day Artificial Intelligence-Based Triage System to Accelerate Door-to-Balloon Times.实施全天人工智能分诊系统以加速门球时间。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2022 Dec;97(12):2291-2303. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2022.05.014. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
6
The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback.基于用户反馈的更新的实施研究综合框架。
Implement Sci. 2022 Oct 29;17(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0.
7
The silent trial - the bridge between bench-to-bedside clinical AI applications.沉默试验——从实验室到床边的临床人工智能应用之间的桥梁。
Front Digit Health. 2022 Aug 16;4:929508. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.929508. eCollection 2022.
8
Assessment of Prices for Cardiovascular Tests and Procedures at Top-Ranked US Hospitals.美国顶尖医院心血管检测和治疗项目的价格评估
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Sep 1;182(9):996-999. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.2602.
9
A machine learning-based clinical decision support algorithm for reducing unnecessary coronary angiograms.一种基于机器学习的临床决策支持算法,用于减少不必要的冠状动脉造影检查。
Cardiovasc Digit Health J. 2021 Dec 24;3(1):21-30. doi: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2021.12.001. eCollection 2022 Feb.
10
CT or Invasive Coronary Angiography in Stable Chest Pain.稳定型胸痛的CT或有创冠状动脉造影
N Engl J Med. 2022 Apr 28;386(17):1591-1602. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2200963. Epub 2022 Mar 4.