Department of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Nov;58(11):2107-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03138.x.
To test the effects of cognitive training on subsequent motor vehicle collision (MVC) involvement of older drivers.
Randomized, controlled, multisite, single-blind clinical trial.
Community-dwelling seniors at four U.S. sites: Birmingham, Alabama; Baltimore, Maryland; Indianapolis, Indiana; and State College, Pennsylvania.
Nine hundred eight older drivers (mean age 73.1; 18.6% African American) who were randomized to one of three cognitive interventions or a control condition.
Up to 10 sessions of cognitive training for memory, reasoning, or speed of processing.
State-recorded MVC involvement up to 6 years after study enrollment.
Speed-of-processing and reasoning training resulted in lower rates of at-fault collision involvement over the subsequent approximately 6-year period than controls. After adjusting for age, sex, race, education, mental status, health, vision, depressive symptoms, and testing site, participants randomized to the speed-of-processing and reasoning interventions had an approximately 50% lower rate (per person-mile) of at-fault MVCs than the control group (rate ratio (RR) = 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.34-0.96 for speed of processing), and (RR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.27-0.92 for reasoning). There was no significant difference observed for the memory group.
Cognitive speed-of-processing and reasoning training resulted in a lower at-fault MVC rate in older drivers than in controls. Considering the importance of driving mobility, the costs of crashes, and the benefits of cognitive training, these interventions have great potential to sustain independence and quality of life of older adults. More research is needed to understand the effects of different types and quantities of training.
测试认知训练对老年驾驶员后续发生机动车碰撞(MVC)的影响。
随机、对照、多地点、单盲临床试验。
美国四个地点的社区居民:阿拉巴马州伯明翰市;马里兰州巴尔的摩市;印第安纳州印第安纳波利斯市;宾夕法尼亚州州学院市。
908 名老年驾驶员(平均年龄 73.1 岁;18.6%为非裔美国人),随机分为三组认知干预组或对照组。
记忆、推理或处理速度的认知训练,最多 10 个疗程。
研究登记后 6 年内的州记录 MVC 参与情况。
与对照组相比,处理速度和推理训练在随后的大约 6 年时间内,导致过错碰撞参与率降低。调整年龄、性别、种族、教育程度、精神状态、健康状况、视力、抑郁症状和测试地点后,随机分配到处理速度和推理干预组的参与者的过错 MVC 发生率比对照组降低了约 50%(每人每英里)(处理速度的比率比(RR)= 0.57,95%置信区间(CI)= 0.34-0.96),(推理的 RR = 0.50,95% CI = 0.27-0.92)。记忆组没有观察到显著差异。
认知处理速度和推理训练使老年驾驶员的过错 MVC 发生率低于对照组。考虑到驾驶机动性的重要性、碰撞的成本以及认知训练的好处,这些干预措施具有极大的潜力,可以维持老年人的独立性和生活质量。需要更多的研究来了解不同类型和数量的训练的效果。