Department of Emergency Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Nov;58(11):2122-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03152.x.
To determine whether there are differences in emergency department (ED) pain assessment and treatment for older and younger adults.
Retrospective observational cohort.
Urban, academic tertiary care ED during July and December 2005.
Adult patients with conditions warranting ED pain care.
Age, Charlson comorbidity score, number of prior medications, sex, race and ethnicity, triage severity, degree of pain, treating clinician, and final ED diagnosis. Pain care process measures were pain assessment and treatment and time of activities.
One thousand thirty-one ED visits met inclusion criteria; 92% of these had a documented pain assessment. Of those reporting pain, 41% had follow-up pain assessments, and 59% received analgesic medication (58% of these as opioids, 24% as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)). In adjusted analyses, there were no differences according to age in pain assessment and receiving any analgesic. Older patients (65-84) were less likely than younger patients (18-64) to receive opioid analgesics for moderate to severe (odds ratio (OR) = 0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.22-0.88) and were more likely to more likely to receive NSAIDs for mild pain (OR = 3.72, 95% CI = 0.97-14.24). Older adults had a lower reduction of initial to final recorded pain scores (P = .002).
There appear to be differences in acute ED pain care for older and younger adults. Lower overall reduction of pain scores and less opioid use for the treatment of painful conditions in older patients highlight disparities of concern. Future studies should determine whether these differences represent inadequate ED pain care.
确定老年和年轻成年人在急诊科(ED)疼痛评估和治疗方面是否存在差异。
回顾性观察队列研究。
2005 年 7 月至 12 月期间,城市学术三级护理 ED。
有 ED 疼痛治疗指征的成年患者。
年龄、Charlson 合并症评分、既往用药次数、性别、种族和民族、分诊严重程度、疼痛程度、治疗临床医生和最终 ED 诊断。疼痛护理过程的测量指标是疼痛评估和治疗以及活动时间。
1031 次 ED 就诊符合纳入标准;其中 92%有记录的疼痛评估。在报告疼痛的患者中,41%有后续疼痛评估,59%接受了镇痛药物治疗(其中 58%为阿片类药物,24%为非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs))。在调整分析中,疼痛评估和接受任何镇痛药物治疗方面,年龄之间没有差异。65-84 岁的老年患者(OR=0.44,95%CI=0.22-0.88)比 18-64 岁的年轻患者更不可能接受阿片类镇痛药治疗中度至重度疼痛,而更有可能接受 NSAIDs 治疗轻度疼痛(OR=3.72,95%CI=0.97-14.24)。老年患者初始到最终记录的疼痛评分降低幅度较低(P=0.002)。
对于老年和年轻成年人,急性 ED 疼痛护理似乎存在差异。老年患者疼痛评分整体降低幅度较低,阿片类药物治疗疼痛性疾病的使用率较低,突出了令人关注的差异。未来的研究应确定这些差异是否代表 ED 疼痛护理不足。