• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癫痫的计算能力和框架偏差。

Numeracy and framing bias in epilepsy.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

Epilepsy Behav. 2011 Jan;20(1):29-33. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.10.005. Epub 2010 Nov 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.10.005
PMID:21059486
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3022367/
Abstract

Patients with epilepsy are frequently confronted with complex treatment decisions. Communicating treatment risks is often difficult because patients may have difficulty with basic statistical concepts (i.e., low numeracy) or might misconceive the statistical information based on the way information is presented, a phenomenon known as "framing bias." We assessed numeracy and framing bias in 95 adults with chronic epilepsy and explored cognitive correlates of framing bias. Compared with normal controls, patients with epilepsy had significantly poorer performance on the Numeracy scale (P=0.02), despite a higher level of education than normal controls (P<0.001). Compared with patients with higher numeracy, patients with lower numeracy were significantly more likely to exhibit framing bias. Abstract problem solving performance correlated with the degree of framing bias (r=0.631, P<0.0001), suggesting a relationship between aspects of executive functioning and framing bias. Poor numeracy and susceptibility framing bias place patients with epilepsy at risk for uninformed decisions.

摘要

癫痫患者经常面临复杂的治疗决策。由于患者可能难以理解基本的统计概念(即低算数能力),或者可能会根据信息呈现的方式误解统计信息,因此沟通治疗风险通常很困难,这种现象被称为“框架偏差”。我们评估了 95 名慢性癫痫患者的算数能力和框架偏差,并探讨了框架偏差的认知相关性。与正常对照组相比,癫痫患者在算数量表上的表现明显较差(P=0.02),尽管他们的教育水平高于正常对照组(P<0.001)。与算数能力较高的患者相比,算数能力较低的患者更有可能出现框架偏差。抽象问题解决能力与框架偏差程度相关(r=0.631,P<0.0001),这表明执行功能的各个方面与框架偏差之间存在关系。较差的算数能力和易受框架偏差影响使癫痫患者面临不明智决策的风险。

相似文献

1
Numeracy and framing bias in epilepsy.癫痫的计算能力和框架偏差。
Epilepsy Behav. 2011 Jan;20(1):29-33. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.10.005. Epub 2010 Nov 6.
2
Health numeracy in Japan: measures of basic numeracy account for framing bias in a highly numerate population.日本的健康算数能力:基本算数能力的衡量标准在一个高度算数的人群中存在框架偏见。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Sep 11;12:104. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-104.
3
Mathematics skills in children with genetic generalized epilepsy: Cognitive and clinical correlates. Preliminary results.遗传性全身性癫痫患儿的数学技能:认知与临床关联。初步结果。
Epilepsy Behav. 2024 Dec;161:110110. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110110. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
4
Understanding Health Risk Comprehension: The Role of Math Anxiety, Subjective Numeracy, and Objective Numeracy.理解健康风险认知:数学焦虑、主观数感和客观数感的作用。
Med Decis Making. 2020 Feb;40(2):222-234. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20904725. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
5
Health literacy and numeracy: key factors in cancer risk comprehension.健康素养与数字能力:癌症风险理解中的关键因素。
Chronic Dis Can. 2008;29(1):1-8.
6
How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making.计算能力如何影响风险理解和医疗决策。
Psychol Bull. 2009 Nov;135(6):943-73. doi: 10.1037/a0017327.
7
Assessing health numeracy among community-dwelling older adults.评估社区居住老年人的健康数字素养。
J Health Commun. 2007 Oct-Nov;12(7):651-65. doi: 10.1080/10810730701619919.
8
Effects of Cognitive Functioning and Education on Later-Life Health Numeracy.认知功能和教育对晚年健康算数能力的影响。
Gerontology. 2020;66(6):582-592. doi: 10.1159/000510092. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
9
Metacognitive beliefs in epilepsy: What is their contribution to quality of life in the context of anxiety, depression and cognitive functioning?癫痫中的元认知信念:在焦虑、抑郁和认知功能背景下,它们对生活质量有何影响?
Epilepsy Behav. 2025 May;166:110356. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110356. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
10
The moderating role of objective and subjective numeracy in attribute framing.客观与主观数字能力在属性框架中的调节作用。
Int J Psychol. 2016 Apr;51(2):109-16. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12138. Epub 2015 Jan 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Mathematics Skills in Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.癫痫的数学技能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2024 Jun;34(2):598-636. doi: 10.1007/s11065-023-09600-8. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
2
Antiseizure Medication Withdrawal Practice Patterns: A Survey Among Members of the American Academy of Neurology and EpiCARE.抗癫痫药物撤药实践模式:美国神经病学学会和癫痫照护研究组成员的一项调查
Neurol Clin Pract. 2023 Feb;13(1):e200109. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200109. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
3
Best-worst scaling preferences among patients with well-controlled epilepsy: Pilot results.癫痫控制良好的患者对最佳最差标度的偏好:初步研究结果。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 3;18(3):e0282658. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282658. eCollection 2023.
4
Antiseizure medication withdrawal risk estimation and recommendations: A survey of American Academy of Neurology and EpiCARE members.抗癫痫药物撤药风险评估和建议:美国神经病学学会和 EpiCARE 成员的调查。
Epilepsia Open. 2023 Jun;8(2):386-398. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12696. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
5
Education and Message Framing Increase Willingness to Undergo Research Lumbar Puncture: A Randomized Controlled Trial.教育与信息框架设计可提高接受研究性腰椎穿刺的意愿:一项随机对照试验
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Sep 18;7:493. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00493. eCollection 2020.
6
Health numeracy in Japan: measures of basic numeracy account for framing bias in a highly numerate population.日本的健康算数能力:基本算数能力的衡量标准在一个高度算数的人群中存在框架偏见。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Sep 11;12:104. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-104.

本文引用的文献

1
Statistical numeracy for health: a cross-cultural comparison with probabilistic national samples.健康领域的统计数字能力:与概率性全国样本的跨文化比较。
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Mar 8;170(5):462-8. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.481.
2
A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking.一种测量思维灵活性的简单客观技术。
J Gen Psychol. 1948 Jul;39:15-22. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1948.9918159.
3
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.《不确定性下的判断:启发式与偏差》
Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
4
Toward the 'tipping point': decision aids and informed patient choice.迈向“临界点”:决策辅助工具与患者的明智选择。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 May-Jun;26(3):716-25. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.716.
5
Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain.人类大脑中的框架、偏差与理性决策
Science. 2006 Aug 4;313(5787):684-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1128356.
6
Numeracy and decision making.算术能力与决策制定。
Psychol Sci. 2006 May;17(5):407-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01720.x.
7
Evidence for a neural correlate of a framing effect: bias-specific activity in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex during credibility judgments.框架效应神经关联的证据:可信度判断过程中腹内侧前额叶皮层的偏差特异性活动。
Brain Res Bull. 2005 Nov 15;67(5):413-21. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2005.06.017. Epub 2005 Jul 25.
8
Intended message versus message received in hypothetical physician risk communications: exploring the gap.假设的医生风险沟通中预期传达的信息与实际接收到的信息:探究差距
Risk Anal. 2004 Oct;24(5):1337-47. doi: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00530.x.
9
What are the chances? Evaluating risk and benefit information in consumer health materials.可能性有多大?评估消费者健康材料中的风险和益处信息。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2004 Apr;92(2):200-8.
10
Interpreting information: what is said, what is heard--a questionnaire study of health professionals and members of the public.
Prenat Diagn. 2002 Dec;22(13):1188-94. doi: 10.1002/pd.489.