Ahrens Courtney E, Stansell Janna, Jennings Amy
California State University at Long Beach, USA.
Violence Vict. 2010;25(5):631-48. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.25.5.631.
There is a growing body of research examining the disclosure of sexual assault. But the focus on time to first disclosure does not capture the whole picture. Survivors also differ in how long they continue to disclose, to whom they disclose, and the types of reactions received during disclosure. To provide a more comprehensive view of disclosure, this study sought to identify patterns of disclosure among a sample of 103 female sexual assault survivors recruited from the community. This study also sought to identify characteristics of each disclosure pattern, differences in how each disclosure pattern tends to unfold (e.g., who is told and how they react), and differences in how these disclosure patterns are related to physical and mental health outcomes. Results revealed four distinct disclosure patterns: nondisclosers, slow starters, crisis disclosers, and ongoing disclosers. Assault characteristics and rape acknowledgment distinguished nondisclosers and slow starters from the other two disclosure groups. Slow starters were also less likely to disclose to police and medical personnel and received negative reactions less frequently while nondisclosers experienced more symptoms of depression and posttraumatic stress than other groups. Implications of these findings for future research and practice are discussed.
越来越多的研究在探讨性侵犯事件的披露情况。但对首次披露时间的关注并不能全面反映情况。幸存者在持续披露的时长、向谁披露以及披露过程中所得到的反应类型等方面也存在差异。为了更全面地了解披露情况,本研究试图在从社区招募的103名女性性侵犯幸存者样本中识别披露模式。本研究还试图确定每种披露模式的特征、每种披露模式的展开方式(例如告知了谁以及他们的反应如何)的差异,以及这些披露模式与身心健康结果之间的关系差异。结果揭示了四种不同的披露模式:不披露者、慢启动者、危机披露者和持续披露者。性侵犯特征和对强奸的承认将不披露者和慢启动者与其他两个披露组区分开来。慢启动者向警方和医务人员披露的可能性也较小,且较少收到负面反应,而不披露者比其他组经历更多的抑郁和创伤后应激症状。本文讨论了这些发现对未来研究和实践的启示。