Nepean Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Nepean Hospital, Derby Street Kingswood 2747, Penrith 2751 Sydney, Australia.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2011 May;96(3):F195-200. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.169847. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
To compare a new two-person method (four hands) of delivering mask ventilation with a standard one-person method using the Laerdal self-inflating bag (SIB) and the Neopuff (NP) infant resuscitator in a manikin model.
Recent studies of simulated neonatal resuscitation using bag and mask ventilation techniques have shown facemask leak levels of 55-57% in expert hands.
48 participants were randomly paired and instructed to give mask ventilation for a 2-min period as single-person resuscitators, then as two-person paired resuscitators at set pressures for NP and set parameters for SIB. Airway pressure, flow, inspiratory tidal volume, expiratory tidal volume and mask leak were recorded.
A total of 21 578 inflations were recorded and analysed. For SIB, mask leak was greater (11.5%) with single-person compared to two-person (5.4%; mean difference 6.1%, 95% CI 1.5 to 10.7, p<0.01). For NP, mask leak was greater for single-person (22.2%) compared to two-person (9.1%; mean difference 13.1% 95% CI 3.6 to 22.6, p<0.01). For single-person mask ventilation, mask leak was greater with NP (22.2%) compared to SIB (11.5%; mean difference 10.7%, 95% CI 1.4 to 19.7, p<0.01). For two-person mask ventilation, mask leak was greater for NP (9.1%) compared to SIB (5.4%; mean difference 3.7%, 95% CI 0.1 to 6.4, p<0.05).
Two-person mask ventilation technique reduces mask leak by approximately 50% compared to the standard one-person mask ventilation method. NP mask ventilation has higher mask leak than Laerdal SIB for both single- and two-person technique mask ventilation.
在模型中比较双人(四人双手)法与标准单人法使用莱德尔(Laerdal)自动充气袋(SIB)和新生儿复苏气囊(NP)面罩通气的效果。
最近使用气囊面罩通气技术模拟新生儿复苏的研究显示,在专家手中面罩泄漏率为 55-57%。
将 48 名参与者随机配对,并指导他们作为单人复苏者进行 2 分钟的面罩通气,然后作为双人配对复苏者,在设定的 NP 压力和设定的 SIB 参数下进行通气。记录气道压力、流量、吸气潮气量、呼气潮气量和面罩泄漏。
共记录和分析了 21578 次通气。对于 SIB,单人通气的面罩泄漏率(11.5%)高于双人(5.4%)(平均差异 6.1%,95%CI 1.5 至 10.7,p<0.01)。对于 NP,单人通气的面罩泄漏率(22.2%)高于双人(9.1%)(平均差异 13.1%,95%CI 3.6 至 22.6,p<0.01)。对于单人面罩通气,NP(22.2%)的面罩泄漏率高于 SIB(11.5%)(平均差异 10.7%,95%CI 1.4 至 19.7,p<0.01)。对于双人面罩通气,NP(9.1%)的面罩泄漏率高于 SIB(5.4%)(平均差异 3.7%,95%CI 0.1 至 6.4,p<0.05)。
与标准单人面罩通气方法相比,双人面罩通气技术可使面罩泄漏减少约 50%。对于单人及双人技术面罩通气,NP 面罩通气的面罩泄漏率均高于莱德尔 SIB。