Suppr超能文献

多组分干预对三级医疗重症监护病房死亡率的影响。

Decreased mortality resulting from a multicomponent intervention in a tertiary care medical intensive care unit.

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2011 Feb;39(2):284-93. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181ffdd2f.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether a multicomponent intervention, particularly increasing staff, can achieve reductions in patient mortality in an already high-intensity, Leapfrog-compliant medical intensive care unit.

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational study.

SETTING

Medical intensive care unit of a tertiary care, academic medical center.

PATIENTS

A total of 1,263 patients admitted between April 19, 2004 and April 18, 2006 (before the organizational change) were compared with 2,424 patients admitted between September 5, 2006 and September 4, 2008.

INTERVENTIONS

A multicomponent intervention including the physical move from a 10-bed to a 29-bed medical intensive care unit with larger patient rooms, the initiation of 24-hr critical care specialist coverage in the medical intensive care unit, an increase in the respiratory therapist:patient ratio, and the addition of a clinical pharmacist to the multidisciplinary team.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Measurements were made based on mortality in the intensive care unit and in-hospital. Patient comorbidity as measured by the Charlson score did not change after the intervention (2.7 ± 2.7 vs. 2.8 ± 2.6, p = .62), nor did the acuity of illness as measured by the case mix index (3.0 ± 3.7 vs. 3.1 ± 3.8, p = .69). The unadjusted medical intensive care unit mortality decreased from 18.4% to 14.9% (p = .006), as did in-hospital mortality (from 25.8% to 21.7%, p = .005). The reduction in medical intensive care unit mortality was consistent in the multivariable regression with adjustment for multiple possible confounders (odds ratio = 0.74, 95% confidence interval: 0.61-0.91, p = .003), as was the reduction in hospital mortality (odds ratio = 0.74, 95% confidence interval: 0.62-0.88, p = .001). In mechanically ventilated patients, there was an increase in median 28-day ventilator-free days (21, interquartile range 0-25 vs. 22, interquartile range 0-26, p = .04). An increase in median medical intensive care unit (2.4, interquartile range 1.1-5.2 vs. 2.7, interquartile range 1.3-5.9), p = .009) but not hospital (8.3, interquartile range 4.1-17.0 vs. 8.2, interquartile range 4.0-16.8; p = .851) length of stay in days occurred with the intervention. The mean daily dosing of fentanyl and lorazepam decreased after the intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

A multicomponent reorganization of medical intensive care unit services was associated with important reductions in mortality for medical intensive care unit patients, as well as an increased number of ventilator-free days. Substantial and sustained changes in clinically important outcomes may be obtained from organizational changes.

摘要

目的

评估一项多组分干预措施,特别是增加人员,是否可以降低已经高强度、符合 Leapfrog 标准的医疗重症监护病房的患者死亡率。

设计

回顾性、观察性研究。

地点

一家三级保健、学术医疗中心的医疗重症监护病房。

患者

比较了 2004 年 4 月 19 日至 2006 年 4 月 18 日期间收治的 1263 名患者(在组织变更前)与 2006 年 9 月 5 日至 2008 年 9 月 4 日期间收治的 2424 名患者。

干预措施

一项多组分干预措施,包括从 10 床重症监护病房迁至 29 床重症监护病房,病房面积更大,重症监护病房开始 24 小时配备重症监护专家,呼吸治疗师与患者的比例增加,以及为多学科团队增加一名临床药师。

测量和主要结果

根据重症监护病房和院内死亡率进行测量。干预后,患者的合并症严重程度(以 Charlson 评分衡量)没有变化(2.7 ± 2.7 对 2.8 ± 2.6,p =.62),疾病严重程度(以病例组合指数衡量)也没有变化(3.0 ± 3.7 对 3.1 ± 3.8,p =.69)。未调整的重症监护病房死亡率从 18.4%降至 14.9%(p =.006),院内死亡率也从 25.8%降至 21.7%(p =.005)。多变量回归分析调整了多个可能的混杂因素后,重症监护病房死亡率的降低仍具有一致性(比值比=0.74,95%置信区间:0.61-0.91,p =.003),院内死亡率的降低也具有一致性(比值比=0.74,95%置信区间:0.62-0.88,p =.001)。在机械通气的患者中,中位 28 天无呼吸机天数(21,四分位间距 0-25 对 22,四分位间距 0-26,p =.04)增加。重症监护病房(中位数 2.4,四分位间距 1.1-5.2 对 2.7,四分位间距 1.3-5.9,p =.009),但不是医院(中位数 8.3,四分位间距 4.1-17.0 对 8.2,四分位间距 4.0-16.8;p =.851)住院天数的中位数增加。干预后芬太尼和劳拉西泮的日平均剂量减少。

结论

医疗重症监护病房服务的多组分重组与重症监护病房患者死亡率的显著降低以及无呼吸机天数的增加有关。从组织变革中可以获得实质性和持续的临床重要结果的改变。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
Teamwork in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房的团队合作。
Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):468-477. doi: 10.1037/amp0000247.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验