• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通用有效性指标:焦虑症中对症状变化的敏感性。

Generic effectiveness measures: sensitivity to symptom change in anxiety disorders.

作者信息

Perini Sarah J, Slade Tim, Andrews Gavin

机构信息

Clinical Research Unit for Anxiety and Depression, University of New South Wales at St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2006 Feb;90(2-3):123-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2005.10.011. Epub 2005 Dec 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2005.10.011
PMID:16337690
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare a newly developed screening measure of disability, the WHODAS II, to three established generic effectiveness measures in terms of its sensitivity to symptom change in people with anxiety disorders.

METHOD

Patients who had undergone treatment for social phobia or panic disorder/agoraphobia at an anxiety disorders clinic were administered generic effectiveness measures and symptom measures before and after treatment. The design was naturalistic and observational. Data analysis included correlations between generic effectiveness and symptom measures; and effect size calculations regarding the ability of each generic effectiveness measure to discriminate between patients whose symptoms improved and patients whose symptoms did not improve over the course of treatment.

RESULTS

The WHODAS II was consistently the most sensitive generic effectiveness measure in its capacity to detect symptom changes in patients with social phobia. The SF-12 and K-10 also showed moderate sensitivity to symptom change. In the sample of patients with panic disorder/agoraphobia, the SF-12 was the most sensitive measure overall, closely followed by the K-10 and WHODAS II. The NCS Disability Days were the least sensitive to symptom change in both samples.

CONCLUSION

The WHODAS II is at least as sensitive as other generic effectiveness measures to anxiety symptom changes, and is particularly sensitive to changes in social anxiety symptoms. It may prove to be a valuable measurement tool for informing public health policy in relation to anxiety disorders.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较一种新开发的残疾筛查工具——世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版(WHODAS II)与三种既定的通用疗效测量工具,看其对焦虑症患者症状变化的敏感性。

方法

在一家焦虑症诊所接受社交恐惧症或惊恐障碍/场所恐惧症治疗的患者,在治疗前后接受通用疗效测量工具和症状测量工具的评估。研究设计为自然观察性研究。数据分析包括通用疗效测量工具与症状测量工具之间的相关性;以及计算每种通用疗效测量工具区分治疗过程中症状改善患者和症状未改善患者的能力的效应量。

结果

在检测社交恐惧症患者症状变化的能力方面,WHODAS II始终是最敏感的通用疗效测量工具。简明健康调查量表(SF-12)和10项心理痛苦量表(K-10)对症状变化也表现出中等敏感性。在惊恐障碍/场所恐惧症患者样本中,SF-12总体上是最敏感的测量工具,紧随其后的是K-10和WHODAS II。国家疾病伤残调查残疾天数在两个样本中对症状变化最不敏感。

结论

WHODAS II对焦虑症状变化的敏感性至少与其他通用疗效测量工具相同,对社交焦虑症状变化尤为敏感。它可能被证明是一种有价值的测量工具,可为焦虑症相关的公共卫生政策提供参考。

相似文献

1
Generic effectiveness measures: sensitivity to symptom change in anxiety disorders.通用有效性指标:焦虑症中对症状变化的敏感性。
J Affect Disord. 2006 Feb;90(2-3):123-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2005.10.011. Epub 2005 Dec 7.
2
Anxiety sensitivity and treatment outcome in panic disorder.惊恐障碍中的焦虑敏感性与治疗结果。
Anxiety. 1996;2(1):34-9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-7154(1996)2:1<34::AID-ANXI5>3.0.CO;2-D.
3
The effect of comorbid substance use disorders on treatment outcome for anxiety disorders.共病物质使用障碍对焦虑症治疗结果的影响。
J Anxiety Disord. 2008 Aug;22(6):1087-98. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.11.007. Epub 2007 Nov 21.
4
Health anxiety and fear of fear in panic disorder and agoraphobia vs. social phobia: a prospective longitudinal study.惊恐障碍和广场恐怖症与社交恐惧症中健康焦虑和对恐惧的恐惧:一项前瞻性纵向研究。
Depress Anxiety. 2010 Apr;27(4):404-11. doi: 10.1002/da.20645.
5
Assessing the clinical utility of agoraphobia in the context of panic disorder.在惊恐障碍背景下评估广场恐惧症的临床效用。
Depress Anxiety. 2008;25(2):158-66. doi: 10.1002/da.20285.
6
Use of medical services and treatment for panic disorder with agoraphobia and for social phobia.广场恐怖症伴惊恐障碍和社交恐惧症的医疗服务使用及治疗情况。
CMAJ. 1992 Sep 15;147(6):878-83.
7
Long-term course and outcome in panic disorder: a naturalistic follow-up study.惊恐障碍的长期病程及转归:一项自然随访研究
Anxiety. 1996;2(1):13-21. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-7154(1996)2:1<13::AID-ANXI2>3.0.CO;2-E.
8
Prediction of outcome in the behavioural treatment of panic disorder with agoraphobia.
Cogn Behav Ther. 2004;33(4):176-80. doi: 10.1080/16506070410031691.
9
Mechanisms of change in cognitive therapy for panic disorder with agoraphobia.伴有广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍认知疗法中的改变机制。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2008 Sep;39(3):262-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2007.07.006. Epub 2007 Jul 25.
10
Comparing the sensitivity of generic effectiveness measures with symptom improvement in persons with schizophrenia.比较通用有效性测量指标与精神分裂症患者症状改善情况的敏感性。
Med Care. 2003 Feb;41(2):208-17. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000044900.72470.D4.

引用本文的文献

1
Preventing "tipping points" in high comorbidity patients: A lifeline from health coaches - rationale, design and methods.预防高共病患者的“临界点”:健康教练的生命线——基本原理、设计与方法
Contemp Clin Trials. 2025 May;152:107865. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2025.107865. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
2
Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy in the real world: Naturalistic use and effectiveness of an evidence-based platform in New Zealand.基于互联网的认知行为疗法在现实世界中的应用:新西兰基于证据的平台的自然使用和有效性。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2024 Mar;58(3):238-249. doi: 10.1177/00048674231183641. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
3
A co-produced online cultural experience compared to a typical museum website for mental health in people aged 16-24: A proof-of-principle randomised controlled trial.
一项针对 16-24 岁人群心理健康的线上文化体验(与典型博物馆网站合作)的原理验证随机对照试验。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2023 May;57(5):745-757. doi: 10.1177/00048674221115648. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
4
Use of online cultural content for mental health and well-being during COVID-19 restrictions: cross-sectional survey.在新冠疫情限制措施期间利用在线文化内容促进心理健康和幸福感:横断面调查
BJPsych Bull. 2022 Oct;46(5):278-287. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2021.103.
5
Assessing Functioning across Common Mental Disorders in Psychiatric Emergency Patients: Results from the WHODAS-2.评估精神科急诊患者常见精神障碍的功能状况:来自 WHODAS-2 的结果。
Can J Psychiatry. 2021 Dec;66(12):1085-1093. doi: 10.1177/0706743720981200. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
6
Measuring functional disability in children with developmental disorders in low-resource settings: validation of Developmental Disorders-Children Disability Assessment Schedule (DD-CDAS) in rural Pakistan.在资源匮乏地区测量发育障碍儿童的功能残疾:《发育障碍-儿童残疾评估量表》(DD-CDAS)在巴基斯坦农村地区的效度验证
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2020 Jul 13;7:e17. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2020.10. eCollection 2020.
7
Modeling the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II using non-parametric item response models.使用非参数项目反应模型对世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版进行建模。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2015 Mar;24(1):1-10. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1462. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
8
Clinical use of the Kessler psychological distress scales with culturally diverse groups.凯斯勒心理困扰量表在不同文化群体中的临床应用。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2014 Jun;23(2):161-83. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1426. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
9
Analysis of the psychological impact of a vascular risk factor intervention: results from a cluster randomized controlled trial in Australian general practice.血管风险因素干预的心理影响分析:来自澳大利亚全科医学中群组随机对照试验的结果。
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Dec 13;14:190. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-190.
10
Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0.制定世界卫生组织残疾评估表 2.0。
Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Nov 1;88(11):815-23. doi: 10.2471/BLT.09.067231. Epub 2010 May 20.