• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

过渡到未来的空中交通管理:自动化不完美对管制员注意力和绩效的影响。

Transitioning to future air traffic management: effects of imperfect automation on controller attention and performance.

机构信息

George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia 22030, USA.

出版信息

Hum Factors. 2010 Jun;52(3):411-25. doi: 10.1177/0018720810375692.

DOI:10.1177/0018720810375692
PMID:21077563
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study examined whether benefits of conflict probe automation would occur in a future air traffic scenario in which air traffic service providers (ATSPs) are not directly responsible for freely maneuvering aircraft but are controlling other nonequipped aircraft (mixed-equipage environment). The objective was to examine how the type of automation imperfection (miss vs. false alarm) affects ATSP performance and attention allocation.

BACKGROUND

Research has shown that the type of automation imperfection leads to differential human performance costs.

METHOD

Participating in four 30-min scenarios were 12 full-performance-level ATSPs. Dependent variables included conflict detection and resolution performance, eye movements, and subjective ratings of trust and self confidence.

RESULTS

ATSPs detected conflicts faster and more accurately with reliable automation, as compared with manual performance. When the conflict probe automation was unreliable, conflict detection performance declined with both miss (25% conflicts detected) and false alarm automation (50% conflicts detected).

CONCLUSION

When the primary task of conflict detection was automated, even highly reliable yet imperfect automation (miss or false alarm) resulted in serious negative effects on operator performance.

APPLICATION

The further in advance that conflict probe automation predicts a conflict, the greater the uncertainty of prediction; thus, designers should provide users with feedback on the state of the automation or other tools that allow for inspection and analysis of the data underlying the conflict probe algorithm.

摘要

目的

本研究考察了在未来的空中交通场景中,当空中交通服务提供商(ATSP)不再直接负责自由操纵飞机,而是控制其他未配备设备的飞机(混合装备环境)时,冲突探测自动化的优势是否会出现。目标是研究自动化缺陷的类型(漏报与误报)如何影响 ATSP 的性能和注意力分配。

背景

研究表明,自动化缺陷的类型会导致不同的人为性能成本。

方法

12 名全性能水平的 ATSP 参与了四个 30 分钟的场景。因变量包括冲突检测和解决性能、眼动以及对信任和自信的主观评价。

结果

与手动性能相比,可靠的自动化使 ATSP 更快、更准确地检测到冲突。当冲突探测自动化不可靠时,漏报(检测到 25%的冲突)和误报(检测到 50%的冲突)的自动化都会导致冲突检测性能下降。

结论

当冲突探测的主要任务实现自动化时,即使是高度可靠但存在缺陷的自动化(漏报或误报)也会对操作人员的性能产生严重的负面影响。

应用

冲突探测自动化预测冲突的时间越早,预测的不确定性就越大;因此,设计人员应该为用户提供自动化状态的反馈,或提供其他允许检查和分析冲突探测算法底层数据的工具。

相似文献

1
Transitioning to future air traffic management: effects of imperfect automation on controller attention and performance.过渡到未来的空中交通管理:自动化不完美对管制员注意力和绩效的影响。
Hum Factors. 2010 Jun;52(3):411-25. doi: 10.1177/0018720810375692.
2
Automation in future air traffic management: effects of decision aid reliability on controller performance and mental workload.未来空中交通管理中的自动化:决策辅助可靠性对管制员绩效和心理负荷的影响。
Hum Factors. 2005 Spring;47(1):35-49. doi: 10.1518/0018720053653802.
3
Benefits of Imperfect Conflict Resolution Advisory Aids for Future Air Traffic Control.不完善冲突解决咨询辅助工具对未来空中交通管制的益处。
Hum Factors. 2016 Nov;58(7):1007-1019. doi: 10.1177/0018720816655941. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
4
Effects of conflict alerting system reliability and task difficulty on pilots' conflict detection with cockpit display of traffic information.冲突警报系统可靠性和任务难度对飞行员通过驾驶舱交通信息显示器进行冲突检测的影响。
Ergonomics. 2007 Jan 15;50(1):112-30. doi: 10.1080/00140130601002658.
5
Procedural errors in air traffic control: effects of traffic density, expertise, and automation.空中交通管制中的程序错误:交通密度、专业技能和自动化的影响。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2006 Jun;77(6):639-43.
6
Human factors assessment of conflict resolution aid reliability and time pressure in future air traffic control.未来空中交通管制中冲突解决辅助工具可靠性和时间压力的人为因素评估
Ergonomics. 2015;58(6):897-908. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.997301. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
7
On the independence of compliance and reliance: are automation false alarms worse than misses?关于依从性和依赖性的独立性:自动化误报比漏报更糟糕吗?
Hum Factors. 2007 Aug;49(4):564-72. doi: 10.1518/001872007X215656.
8
Effects of imperfect automation on decision making in a simulated command and control task.模拟指挥与控制任务中不完美自动化对决策的影响。
Hum Factors. 2007 Feb;49(1):76-87. doi: 10.1518/001872007779598082.
9
An analysis of relational complexity in an air traffic control conflict detection task.空中交通管制冲突检测任务中的关系复杂性分析。
Ergonomics. 2006 Nov 15;49(14):1508-26. doi: 10.1080/00140130600779744.
10
Relative position vectors: an alternative approach to conflict detection in air traffic control.相对位置向量:空中交通管制中冲突检测的一种替代方法。
Hum Factors. 2013 Oct;55(5):946-64. doi: 10.1177/0018720813481803.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding reliance on automation: effects of error type, error distribution, age and experience.理解对自动化的依赖:错误类型、错误分布、年龄和经验的影响。
Theor Issues Ergon Sci. 2014 Mar;15(2):134-160. doi: 10.1080/1463922X.2011.611269.