Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Sciences, Cambridge, UK.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Nov 10;8:124. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-124.
Environmental perceptions and psychological measures appear to be associated with walking and cycling behaviour; however, their influence is still unclear. We assessed these associations using baseline data from a quasi-experimental cohort study of the effects of major transport infrastructural developments in Cambridge, UK.
Postal surveys were sent to adults who travel to work in Cambridge (n = 1582). Questions asked about travel modes and time spent travelling to and from work in the last week, perceptions of the route, psychological measures regarding car use and socio-demographic characteristics. Participants were classified into one of two categories according to time spent walking for commuting ('no walking' or 'some walking') and one of three categories for cycling ('no cycling', '1-149 min/wk' and ' ≥ 150 min/wk').
Of the 1164 respondents (68% female, mean (SD) age: 42.3 (11.4) years) 30% reported any walking and 53% reported any cycling to or from work. In multiple regression models, short distance to work and not having access to a car showed strong positive associations with both walking and cycling. Furthermore, those who reported that it was pleasant to walk were more likely to walk to or from work (OR = 4.18, 95% CI 3.02 to 5.78) and those who reported that it was convenient to cycle on the route between home and work were more likely to do so (1-149 min/wk: OR = 4.60, 95% CI 2.88 to 7.34; ≥ 150 min/wk: OR = 3.14, 95% CI 2.11 to 4.66). Positive attitudes in favour of car use were positively associated with time spent walking to or from work but negatively associated with cycling to or from work. Strong perceived behavioural control for car use was negatively associated with walking.
In this relatively affluent sample of commuters, a range of individual and household characteristics, perceptions of the route environment and psychological measures relating to car use were associated with walking or cycling to and from work. Taken together, these findings suggest that social and physical contexts of travel decision-making should be considered and that a range of influences may require to be addressed to bring about behaviour change.
环境认知和心理测量似乎与步行和骑行行为有关;然而,其影响尚不清楚。我们使用英国剑桥市主要交通基础设施发展对影响的准实验队列研究的基线数据评估了这些关联。
向在剑桥工作的成年人(n=1582)发送了邮政调查。问题询问了上周上班往返的出行方式和时间、对路线的看法、关于汽车使用的心理测量以及社会人口特征。根据通勤步行时间,参与者被分为两类(“无步行”或“部分步行”),根据每周骑行时间分为三类(“无骑行”、“1-149 分钟/周”和“≥150 分钟/周”)。
在 1164 名受访者中(68%为女性,平均(SD)年龄:42.3(11.4)岁),30%报告有任何步行,53%报告有任何骑行上班。在多元回归模型中,短距离上班和没有汽车显示出与步行和骑行的强烈正相关。此外,那些报告步行很愉快的人更有可能上下班步行(OR=4.18,95%CI 3.02-5.78),那些报告在家庭和工作之间的路线上骑车很方便的人更有可能这样做(1-149 分钟/周:OR=4.60,95%CI 2.88-7.34;≥150 分钟/周:OR=3.14,95%CI 2.11-4.66)。赞成汽车使用的积极态度与上下班步行时间呈正相关,但与上下班骑行时间呈负相关。对汽车使用的强烈感知行为控制与步行呈负相关。
在这个相对富裕的通勤者样本中,一系列个人和家庭特征、对路线环境的认知以及与汽车使用相关的心理测量与上下班步行或骑行有关。总的来说,这些发现表明,应该考虑出行决策的社会和物理背景,并且可能需要解决一系列影响因素才能带来行为改变。