Prins R G, Panter J, Heinen E, Griffin S J, Ogilvie D B
MRC Epidemiology Unit and UKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR), School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
MRC Epidemiology Unit and UKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR), School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Prev Med. 2016 Jun;87:175-182. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.02.042. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
Mechanisms linking changes to the environment with changes in physical activity are poorly understood. Insights into mechanisms of interventions can help strengthen causal attribution and improve understanding of divergent response patterns. We examined the causal pathways linking exposure to new transport infrastructure with changes in cycling to work.
We used baseline (2009) and follow-up (2012) data (N=469) from the Commuting and Health in Cambridge natural experimental study (Cambridge, UK). Exposure to new infrastructure in the form of the Cambridgeshire Guided Busway was defined using residential proximity. Mediators studied were changes in perceptions of the route to work, theory of planned behaviour constructs and self-reported use of the new infrastructure. Outcomes were modelled as an increase, decrease or no change in weekly cycle commuting time. We used regression analyses to identify combinations of mediators forming potential pathways between exposure and outcome. We then tested these pathways in a path model and stratified analyses by baseline level of active commuting.
We identified changes in perceptions of the route to work, and use of the cycle path, as potential mediators. Of these potential mediators, only use of the path significantly explained (85%) the effect of the infrastructure in increasing cycling. Path use also explained a decrease in cycling among more active commuters.
The findings strengthen the causal argument that changing the environment led to changes in health-related behaviour via use of the new infrastructure, but also show how some commuters may have spent less time cycling as a result.
环境变化与身体活动变化之间的关联机制尚不清楚。深入了解干预机制有助于加强因果归因,并增进对不同反应模式的理解。我们研究了新交通基础设施暴露与骑车上班变化之间的因果路径。
我们使用了来自英国剑桥通勤与健康自然实验研究(2009年基线和2012年随访)的数据(N = 469)。以剑桥郡引导式公交专用道形式存在的新基础设施暴露是根据居住距离来定义的。所研究的中介因素包括对上班路线的认知变化、计划行为理论构成要素以及自我报告的新基础设施使用情况。结果被建模为每周骑车通勤时间的增加、减少或无变化。我们使用回归分析来确定构成暴露与结果之间潜在路径的中介因素组合。然后我们在路径模型中测试这些路径,并按主动通勤的基线水平进行分层分析。
我们确定了对上班路线的认知变化和自行车道的使用作为潜在中介因素。在这些潜在中介因素中,只有自行车道的使用显著解释了(85%)基础设施对增加骑车行为的影响。自行车道的使用也解释了在更积极的通勤者中骑车行为的减少。
研究结果强化了这样的因果论点,即环境变化通过新基础设施的使用导致了与健康相关行为的变化,但同时也表明了一些通勤者可能因此骑车时间减少的情况。