Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
PLoS One. 2010 Nov 15;5(11):e13995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013995.
The adaptive function of bystander initiated post-conflict affiliation (also: consolation & appeasement) has been debated for 30 years. Three influential hypotheses compete for the most likely explanation but have not previously been tested with a single data set. The consolation hypothesis argues that bystander affiliation calms the victim and reduces their stress levels. The self-protection hypothesis proposes that a bystander offers affiliation to either opponent to protect himself from redirected aggression by this individual. The relationship-repair hypothesis suggests a bystander can substitute for a friend to reconcile the friend with the friend's former opponent. Here, we contrast all three hypotheses and tested their predictions with data on wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) of the Taï National Park, Côte d'Ivoire. We examined the first and second post-conflict interactions with respect to both the dyadic and triadic relationships between the bystander and the two opponents. Results showed that female bystanders offered affiliation to their aggressor friends and the victims of their friends, while male bystanders offered affiliation to their victim friends and the aggressors of their friends. For both sexes, bystander affiliation resulted in a subsequent interaction pattern that is expected for direct reconciliation. Bystander affiliation offered to the opponent's friend was more likely to lead to affiliation among opponents in their subsequent interaction. Also, tolerance levels among former opponents were reset to normal levels. In conclusion, this study provides strong evidence for the relationship-repair hypothesis, moderate evidence for the consolation hypothesis and no evidence for the self-protection hypothesis. Furthermore, that bystanders can repair a relationship on behalf of their friend indicates that recipient chimpanzees are aware of the relationships between others, even when they are not kin. This presents a mechanism through which chimpanzees may gain benefits from social knowledge.
旁观者发起冲突后联系(也称为安慰和安抚)的适应功能已经争论了 30 年。三个有影响力的假设竞争最有可能的解释,但以前没有使用单个数据集进行测试。安慰假设认为旁观者的联系可以使受害者平静下来并降低他们的压力水平。自我保护假设提出,旁观者向任何一个对手提供联系,以保护自己免受该个体的转移攻击。关系修复假设表明,旁观者可以代替朋友来调和朋友与朋友的前对手之间的关系。在这里,我们对比了所有三个假设,并利用科特迪瓦塔伊国家公园的野生黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes verus)的数据检验了它们的预测。我们检查了冲突后的第一个和第二个互动,涉及旁观者与两个对手之间的二元和三元关系。结果表明,雌性旁观者向她们的攻击者朋友和朋友的受害者提供联系,而雄性旁观者向他们的受害者朋友和朋友的攻击者提供联系。对于两种性别,旁观者的联系导致了随后的互动模式,这是直接和解所预期的。向对手的朋友提供的旁观者联系更有可能导致他们在随后的互动中联系。此外,前对手之间的容忍度也恢复到正常水平。总之,这项研究为关系修复假说提供了强有力的证据,为安慰假说提供了中等证据,而没有为自我保护假说提供证据。此外,旁观者可以代表他们的朋友修复关系,这表明接受者黑猩猩即使不是亲属,也能意识到他人之间的关系。这提供了一个机制,通过这个机制,黑猩猩可以从社会知识中获益。