• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乌鸦会表现出安慰吗?对其他受困扰者的反应。

Do ravens show consolation? Responses to distressed others.

机构信息

Department of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2010 May 12;5(5):e10605. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010605.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0010605
PMID:20485685
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2868892/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bystander affiliation (post-conflict affiliation from an uninvolved bystander to the conflict victim) may represent an expression of empathy in which the bystander consoles the victim to alleviate the victim's distress ("consolation"). However, alternative hypotheses for the function of bystander affiliation also exist. Determining whether ravens spontaneously offer consolation to distressed partners may not only help us to understand how animals deal with the costs of aggressive conflict, but may also play an important role in the empathy debate.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: This study investigates the post-conflict behavior of ravens, applying the predictive framework for the function of bystander affiliation for the first time in a non-ape species. We found weak evidence for reconciliation (post-conflict affiliation between former opponents), but strong evidence for both bystander affiliation and solicited bystander affiliation (post-conflict affiliation from the victim to a bystander). Bystanders involved in both interactions were likely to share a valuable relationship with the victim. Bystander affiliation offered to the victim was more likely to occur after intense conflicts. Renewed aggression was less likely to occur after the victim solicited affiliation from a bystander.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings suggest that in ravens, bystanders may console victims with whom they share a valuable relationship, thus alleviating the victims' post-conflict distress. Conversely victims may affiliate with bystanders after a conflict in order to reduce the likelihood of renewed aggression. These results stress the importance of relationship quality in determining the occurrence and function of post-conflict interactions, and show that ravens may be sensitive to the emotions of others.

摘要

背景

旁观者结盟(在冲突结束后,一个与冲突无关的旁观者与冲突受害者结盟)可能代表一种同理心的表达,旁观者通过安慰受害者来减轻受害者的痛苦(“安慰”)。然而,旁观者结盟的功能也存在其他替代假设。确定渡鸦是否会自发地安慰痛苦的伴侣,不仅有助于我们了解动物如何应对攻击性冲突的代价,而且可能在同理心辩论中发挥重要作用。

方法/主要发现:本研究应用旁观者结盟功能的预测框架,首次在非类人猿物种中调查了渡鸦的冲突后行为。我们发现了和解(前对手之间的冲突后结盟)的微弱证据,但有强烈的证据表明存在旁观者结盟和请求的旁观者结盟(受害者与旁观者之间的冲突后结盟)。参与这两种互动的旁观者很可能与受害者有有价值的关系。向受害者提供的旁观者结盟更有可能在激烈的冲突后发生。当受害者向旁观者请求结盟时,再次发生攻击的可能性较低。

结论/意义:我们的发现表明,在渡鸦中,旁观者可能会安慰与他们有有价值关系的受害者,从而减轻受害者的冲突后痛苦。相反,受害者可能会在冲突后与旁观者结盟,以降低再次发生攻击的可能性。这些结果强调了关系质量在确定冲突后互动的发生和功能中的重要性,并表明渡鸦可能对他人的情绪敏感。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f222/2868892/ca3cfe6c318f/pone.0010605.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f222/2868892/46cec4829d8d/pone.0010605.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f222/2868892/07d79cf9dcbb/pone.0010605.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f222/2868892/ca3cfe6c318f/pone.0010605.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f222/2868892/46cec4829d8d/pone.0010605.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f222/2868892/07d79cf9dcbb/pone.0010605.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f222/2868892/ca3cfe6c318f/pone.0010605.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Do ravens show consolation? Responses to distressed others.乌鸦会表现出安慰吗?对其他受困扰者的反应。
PLoS One. 2010 May 12;5(5):e10605. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010605.
2
Receiving post-conflict affiliation from the enemy's friend reconciles former opponents.从前的对手通过接受来自敌人朋友的战后支持而和解。
PLoS One. 2010 Nov 15;5(11):e13995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013995.
3
Self-protective function of post-conflict bystander affiliation in mandrills.山魈冲突后旁观者从属关系的自我保护功能
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38936. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038936. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
4
Functions of post-conflict bystander affiliations toward aggressors and victims in bottlenose dolphins.冲突后旁观者与宽吻海豚中攻击者和受害者的关系。
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 2;10(1):3776. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60423-6.
5
Post-conflict affiliation by chimpanzees with aggressors: other-oriented versus selfish political strategy.冲突后黑猩猩与攻击者的结盟:面向他人的与自私的政治策略。
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22173. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022173. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
6
Bonobos protect and console friends and kin.倭黑猩猩会保护并安慰朋友和亲属。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 5;8(11):e79290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079290. eCollection 2013.
7
Conflict management in rooks (Corvus frugilegus): Victims do not display post-conflict affiliation but avoid their former aggressor.白嘴鸦(Corvus frugilegus)的冲突管理:受害者不会在冲突后表现出从属关系,而是会避开其先前的攻击者。
Behav Processes. 2020 Oct;179:104198. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104198. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
8
Ravens reconcile after aggressive conflicts with valuable partners.乌鸦会在与有价值的伙伴发生激烈冲突后和解。
PLoS One. 2011 Mar 25;6(3):e18118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018118.
9
Bonobos respond to distress in others: consolation across the age spectrum.倭黑猩猩会对其他个体的痛苦做出反应:跨越年龄范围的安慰行为。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e55206. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055206. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
10
Empathy versus parsimony in understanding post-conflict affiliation in monkeys: model and empirical data.理解猴子冲突后归属关系中的共情与简约性:模型与实证数据
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 17;9(3):e91262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091262. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
Dimensions of corvid consciousness.鸦科动物意识的维度。
Anim Cogn. 2025 May 2;28(1):35. doi: 10.1007/s10071-025-01949-y.
2
Witness for resolution: post-conflict quadratic affiliation in semi-free ranging pigs.解决见证:半放养状态下猪群冲突后的二次群体归属
Curr Zool. 2023 Apr 27;70(2):233-243. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoad016. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
The proximate regulation of prosocial behaviour: towards a conceptual framework for comparative research.亲社会行为的近因调控:走向比较研究的概念框架。

本文引用的文献

1
Dyadic and triadic reconciliation in pigtail macaques (Macaca nemestrina).豚尾猕猴(食蟹猕猴)的二元和解与三元和解
Am J Primatol. 1991;23(4):225-237. doi: 10.1002/ajp.1350230403.
2
The quality of social relationships in ravens.乌鸦社会关系的质量
Anim Behav. 2010 Apr 1;79(4):927-933. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.01.008.
3
Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) consolation: third-party identity as a window on possible function.黑猩猩(黑猩猩属)的安慰行为:第三方身份作为洞察潜在功能的窗口。
Anim Cogn. 2024 Mar 2;27(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01846-w.
4
Why are ravens smart? Exploring the social intelligence hypothesis.为什么乌鸦很聪明?探索社会智力假说。
J Ornithol. 2024;165(1):15-26. doi: 10.1007/s10336-023-02111-6. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
5
Pain: Behavioural expression and response in an evolutionary framework.疼痛:进化框架下的行为表达与反应
Evol Med Public Health. 2023 Nov 8;11(1):429-437. doi: 10.1093/emph/eoad038. eCollection 2023.
6
Caring animals and the ways we wrong them.关爱动物以及我们伤害它们的方式。
Biol Philos. 2023;38(4):25. doi: 10.1007/s10539-023-09913-1. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
7
Neural mechanisms of comforting: Prosocial touch and stress buffering.安慰的神经机制:亲社会触摸和压力缓冲。
Horm Behav. 2023 Jul;153:105391. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2023.105391. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
8
Individual personality predicts social network assemblages in a colonial bird.个体个性预测了一种群居鸟类的社会网络组合。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 1;13(1):2258. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29315-3.
9
Domestic pigs (Sus scrofa) engage in non-random post-conflict affiliation with third parties: cognitive and functional implications.家猪(Sus scrofa)会与第三方进行非随机的冲突后结盟:认知和功能意义。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Mar;26(2):687-701. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01688-4. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
10
A comparative study of mirror self-recognition in three corvid species.三种鸦科动物的镜像自我识别比较研究。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Jan;26(1):229-248. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01696-4. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
J Comp Psychol. 2010 Aug;124(3):278-86. doi: 10.1037/a0019144.
4
Why are bystanders friendly to recipients of aggression?为什么旁观者会对受攻击者友善?
Commun Integr Biol. 2009 May;2(3):285-91. doi: 10.4161/cib.2.3.8718.
5
Rich pickings near large communal roosts favor 'gang' foraging by juvenile common ravens, Corvus corax.大型群居栖息地附近丰富的食物资源有利于幼年普通渡鸦(Corvus corax)进行“群体”觅食。
PLoS One. 2009;4(2):e4530. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004530. Epub 2009 Feb 25.
6
Post-conflict third-party affiliation in chimpanzees: what's in it for the third party?黑猩猩冲突后的第三方联盟:第三方能从中获得什么?
Am J Primatol. 2009 May;71(5):409-18. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20668.
7
Reconciliation, consolation and postconflict behavioral specificity in chimpanzees.黑猩猩的和解、安慰与冲突后行为特异性
Am J Primatol. 2008 Dec;70(12):1114-23. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20608.
8
Mirror-induced behavior in the magpie (Pica pica): evidence of self-recognition.喜鹊(Pica pica)的镜子诱导行为:自我识别的证据。
PLoS Biol. 2008 Aug 19;6(8):e202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060202.
9
Stress reduction through consolation in chimpanzees.通过安慰来减轻黑猩猩的压力。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jun 24;105(25):8557-62. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804141105. Epub 2008 Jun 16.
10
Heart rate modulation in bystanding geese watching social and non-social events.旁观大雁在观看社交和非社交事件时的心率调节。
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Jul 22;275(1643):1653-9. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0146.