Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, NE, Mailstop E-46, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
J Sch Health. 2010 Dec;80(12):599-613. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2010.00547.x.
To identify whether school health policies and programs vary by demographic characteristics of schools, using data from the School Health Policies and Programs Study (SHPPS) 2006. This study updates a similar study conducted with SHPPS 2000 data and assesses several additional policies and programs measured for the first time in SHPPS 2006.
SHPPS 2006 assessed the status of 8 components of the coordinated school health model using a nationally representative sample of public, Catholic, and private schools at the elementary, middle, and high school levels. Data were collected from school faculty and staff using computer-assisted personal interviews and then linked with extant data on school characteristics.
Results from a series of regression analyses indicated that a number of school policies and programs varied by school type (public, Catholic, or private), urbanicity, school size, discretionary dollars per pupil, percentage of white students, percentage of students qualifying for free lunch funds, and, among high schools, percentage of college-bound students. Catholic and private schools, smaller schools, and those with low discretionary dollars per pupil did not have as many key school health policies and programs as did schools that were public, larger, and had higher discretionary dollars per pupil. However, no single type of school had all key components of a coordinated school health program in place.
Although some categories of schools had fewer policies and programs in place, all had both strengths and weaknesses. Regardless of school characteristics, all schools have the potential to implement a quality school health program.
为了确定学校健康政策和计划是否因学校的人口统计学特征而有所不同，本研究利用 2006 年学校健康政策和计划研究（SHPPS）的数据进行分析。本研究更新了一项使用 SHPPS 2000 年数据进行的类似研究，并评估了 SHPPS 2006 年首次测量的几项额外政策和计划。
SHPPS 2006 采用全国代表性样本，对小学、初中和高中的公立、天主教和私立学校，使用计算机辅助个人访谈，对协调学校健康模式的 8 个组成部分的现状进行评估。从学校教职员工那里收集数据，然后将其与学校特征的现有数据进行链接。
一系列回归分析的结果表明，许多学校政策和计划因学校类型（公立、天主教或私立）、城市性、学校规模、每名学生的可支配金额、白人学生比例、享受免费午餐基金的学生比例以及高中的大学预备学生比例而有所不同。与公立、规模较大、每名学生可支配金额较高的学校相比，天主教和私立学校、规模较小、每名学生可支配金额较低的学校没有那么多关键的学校健康政策和计划。然而，没有任何一种类型的学校拥有协调学校健康计划的所有关键组成部分。
尽管某些类型的学校实施的政策和计划较少，但所有学校都有优势和劣势。无论学校特征如何，所有学校都有潜力实施优质的学校健康计划。
