Cancer Research UK, Centre for Epidemiology, Mathematics, and Statistics, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of London, London, UK.
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Dec;11(12):1135-41. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70257-6. Epub 2010 Nov 17.
The Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of anastrozole (1 mg) with tamoxifen (20 mg), both given orally every day for 5 years, as adjuvant treatment for postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer. In this analysis, we assess the long-term outcomes after a median follow-up of 120 months.
We used a proportional hazards model to assess the primary endpoint of disease-free survival, and the secondary endpoints of time to recurrence, time to distant recurrence, incidence of new contralateral breast cancer, overall survival, and death with or without recurrence in all randomised patients (anastrozole n=3125, tamoxifen n=3116) and hormone-receptor-positive patients (anastrozole n=2618, tamoxifen n=2598). After treatment completion, we continued to collect data on fractures and serious adverse events in a masked fashion (safety population: anastrozole n=3092, tamoxifen n=3094). This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN18233230.
Patients were followed up for a median of 120 months (range 0-145); there were 24,522 woman-years of follow-up in the anastrozole group and 23,950 woman-years in the tamoxifen group. In the full study population, there were significant improvements in the anastrozole group compared with the tamoxifen group for disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0·91, 95% CI 0·83-0·99; p=0·04), time to recurrence (0·84, 0·75-0·93; p=0·001), and time to distant recurrence (0·87, 0·77-0·99; p=0·03). For hormone-receptor-positive patients, the results were also significantly in favour of the anastrozole group for disease-free survival (HR 0·86, 95% CI 0·78-0·95; p=0·003), time to recurrence (0·79, 0·70-0·89; p=0·0002), and time to distant recurrence (0·85, 0·73-0·98; p=0·02). In hormone-receptor-positive patients, absolute differences in time to recurrence between anastrozole and tamoxifen increased over time (2·7% at 5 years and 4·3% at 10 years) and recurrence rates remained significantly lower on anastrozole than tamoxifen after treatment completion (HR 0·81, 95% CI 0·67-0·98; p=0·03), although the carryover benefit was smaller after 8 years. There was weak evidence of fewer deaths after recurrence with anastrozole compared with tamoxifen treatment in the hormone-receptor-positive subgroup (HR 0·87, 95% CI 0·74-1·02; p=0·09), but there was little difference in overall mortality (0·95, 95% CI 0·84-1·06; p=0·4). Fractures were more frequent during active treatment in patients receiving anastrozole than those receiving tamoxifen (451 vs 351; OR 1·33, 95% CI 1·15-1·55; p<0·0001), but were similar in the post-treatment follow-up period (110 vs 112; OR 0·98, 95% CI 0·74-1·30; p=0·9). Treatment-related serious adverse events were less common in the anastrozole group than the tamoxifen group (223 anastrozole vs 369 tamoxifen; OR 0·57, 95% CI 0·48-0·69; p<0·0001), but were similar after treatment completion (66 vs 78; OR 0·84, 95% CI 0·60-1·19; p=0·3). No differences in non-breast cancer causes of death were apparent and the incidence of other cancers was similar between groups (425 vs 431) and continue to be higher with anastrozole for colorectal (66 vs 44) and lung cancer (51 vs 34), and lower for endometrial cancer (six vs 24), melanoma (eight vs 19), and ovarian cancer (17 vs 28). No new safety concerns were reported.
These data confirm the long-term superior efficacy and safety of anastrozole over tamoxifen as initial adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive early breast cancer.
阿那曲唑、他莫昔芬、单独或联合(ATAC)试验旨在比较阿那曲唑(1 毫克)与他莫昔芬(20 毫克)的疗效和安全性,两种药物均每天口服,持续 5 年,作为绝经后早期乳腺癌女性的辅助治疗。在此分析中,我们评估了中位随访 120 个月后的长期结果。
我们使用比例风险模型评估无病生存率这一主要终点,以及复发时间、远处复发时间、新对侧乳腺癌发生率、总生存率和所有随机患者(阿那曲唑组 3125 例,他莫昔芬组 3116 例)和激素受体阳性患者(阿那曲唑组 2618 例,他莫昔芬组 2598 例)的复发相关死亡或无复发相关死亡的次要终点。治疗完成后,我们继续以盲法(安全性人群:阿那曲唑组 3092 例,他莫昔芬组 3094 例)收集骨折和严重不良事件的数据。本研究作为国际标准随机对照试验进行注册,编号为 ISRCTN84757274。
患者中位随访 120 个月(范围 0-145);阿那曲唑组有 24522 名女性年随访,他莫昔芬组有 23950 名女性年随访。在全人群中,与他莫昔芬组相比,阿那曲唑组无病生存率显著改善(风险比[HR]0·91,95%CI 0·83-0·99;p=0·04)、复发时间(0·84,0·75-0·93;p=0·001)和远处复发时间(0·87,0·77-0·99;p=0·03)。对于激素受体阳性患者,阿那曲唑组的结果也明显有利于无病生存率(HR 0·86,95%CI 0·78-0·95;p=0·003)、复发时间(0·79,0·70-0·89;p=0·0002)和远处复发时间(0·85,0·73-0·98;p=0·02)。在激素受体阳性患者中,阿那曲唑与他莫昔芬之间的复发时间差异随时间推移而逐渐增大(5 年时为 2.7%,10 年时为 4.3%),且治疗完成后,阿那曲唑组的复发率仍显著低于他莫昔芬组(HR 0·81,95%CI 0·67-0·98;p=0·03),尽管 8 年后获益较小。激素受体阳性亚组中,阿那曲唑组的复发后死亡率与他莫昔芬组相比略有下降(HR 0·87,95%CI 0·74-1·02;p=0·09),但总死亡率差异较小(0·95,95%CI 0·84-1·06;p=0·4)。接受阿那曲唑治疗的患者在治疗期间骨折的发生率高于接受他莫昔芬治疗的患者(451 例比 351 例;比值比[OR]1·33,95%CI 1·15-1·55;p<0·0001),但在治疗后随访期间相似(110 例比 112 例;OR 0·98,95%CI 0·74-1·30;p=0·9)。阿那曲唑组治疗相关严重不良事件的发生率低于他莫昔芬组(223 例比 369 例;OR 0·57,95%CI 0·48-0·69;p<0·0001),但治疗完成后相似(66 例比 78 例;OR 0·84,95%CI 0·60-1·19;p=0·3)。两组非乳腺癌死亡原因无明显差异,且各组的其他癌症发生率相似(425 例比 431 例),且接受阿那曲唑治疗的结直肠癌(66 例比 44 例)和肺癌(51 例比 34 例)的发病率更高,而子宫内膜癌(6 例比 24 例)、黑素瘤(8 例比 19 例)和卵巢癌(17 例比 28 例)的发病率更低。未报告新的安全问题。
这些数据证实了阿那曲唑作为绝经后激素敏感早期乳腺癌女性初始辅助治疗,在疗效和安全性方面优于他莫昔芬。