• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比重能很好地估计尿渗透压吗?

Is specific gravity a good estimate of urine osmolality?

机构信息

Berkshire Medical Center, Internal Medicine, Pittsfield, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Lab Anal. 2010;24(6):426-30. doi: 10.1002/jcla.20424.

DOI:10.1002/jcla.20424
PMID:21089176
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6647580/
Abstract

CONTEXT

Urine specific gravity (USG) is often used by clinicians to estimate urine osmolality. USG is measured either by refractometry or by reagent strip.

OBJECTIVE

We studied the correlation of USG obtained by either method with a concurrently obtained osmolality.

DESIGN

Using our laboratory's records, we retrospectively gathered data on 504 urine specimens on patients on whom a simultaneously drawn USG and an osmolality were available. Out of these, 253 USG's were measured by automated refractometry and 251 USG's were measured by reagent strip. Urinalysis data on these subjects were used to determine the correlation between USG and osmolality, adjusting for other variables that may impact the relationship. The other variables considered were pH, protein, glucose, ketones, nitrates, bilirubin, urobilinogen, hemoglobin, and leukocyte esterase. The relationships were analyzed by linear regression.

RESULTS

This study demonstrated that USG obtained by both reagent strip and refractometry had a correlation of approximately 0.75 with urine osmolality. The variables affecting the correlation included pH, ketones, bilirubin, urobilinogen, glucose, and protein for the reagent strip and ketones, bilirubin, and hemoglobin for the refractometry method. At a pH of 7 and with an USG of 1.010 predicted osmolality is approximately 300  mosm/kg/H(2)O for either method. For an increase in SG of 0.010, predicted osmolality increases by 182  mosm/kg/H(2) O for the reagent strip and 203  mosm/kg/H(2)O for refractometry. Pathological urines had significantly poorer correlation between USG and osmolality than "clean" urines.

CONCLUSION

In pathological urines, direct measurement of urine osmolality should be used.

摘要

背景

尿液比重(USG)常被临床医生用于估计尿液渗透压。USG 可通过折射仪或试剂条测量。

目的

我们研究了两种方法获得的 USG 与同时获得的渗透压之间的相关性。

设计

使用我们实验室的记录,我们回顾性地收集了 504 份尿液样本的数据,这些样本的患者同时进行了 USG 和渗透压检测。其中,253 个 USG 通过自动折射仪测量,251 个 USG 通过试剂条测量。对这些患者的尿液分析数据进行了分析,以确定 USG 与渗透压之间的相关性,同时调整了可能影响这种关系的其他变量。考虑的其他变量包括 pH 值、蛋白质、葡萄糖、酮体、硝酸盐、胆红素、尿胆原、血红蛋白和白细胞酯酶。使用线性回归分析这些关系。

结果

本研究表明,两种试剂条和折射仪获得的 USG 与尿液渗透压的相关性约为 0.75。影响相关性的变量包括 pH 值、酮体、胆红素、尿胆原、葡萄糖和蛋白质(试剂条)和酮体、胆红素和血红蛋白(折射仪)。在 pH 值为 7 且 USG 值为 1.010 时,两种方法的预测渗透压约为 300  mosm/kg/H(2)O。试剂条的 SG 增加 0.010 时,预测渗透压增加 182  mosm/kg/H(2)O,折射仪增加 203  mosm/kg/H(2)O。病理性尿液的 USG 与渗透压之间的相关性明显低于“清洁”尿液。

结论

在病理性尿液中,应直接测量尿液渗透压。

相似文献

1
Is specific gravity a good estimate of urine osmolality?比重能很好地估计尿渗透压吗?
J Clin Lab Anal. 2010;24(6):426-30. doi: 10.1002/jcla.20424.
2
[Urinary specific gravity--comparative measurements using reagent strips and refractometer in 340 morning urine samples].[尿比重——使用试条和折射仪对340份晨尿样本进行的对比测量]
Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax. 1993 Jan 26;82(4):112-6.
3
Comparison of the techniques of evaluation of urine dilution/concentration in the dog.犬尿液稀释/浓缩评估技术的比较。
J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med. 2003 Aug;50(6):322-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0442.2003.00542.x.
4
Association between urine osmolality and specific gravity in dogs and the effect of commonly measured urine solutes on that association.犬尿液渗透压与比重之间的关联以及常见测量的尿溶质对该关联的影响。
Am J Vet Res. 2013 Dec;74(12):1542-5. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.74.12.1542.
5
[Evaluation of a test strip for the determination of urine specific gravity in the dog].[用于测定犬尿比重的试纸条评估]
Tijdschr Diergeneeskd. 1995 Jul 1;120(13):400-2.
6
Validity of HydraTrend reagent strips for the assessment of hydration status.用于评估水合状态的HydraTrend试剂条的有效性。
J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Sep;28(9):2634-9. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000430.
7
Measurement of urinary concentration: a critical appraisal of methodologies.尿浓缩功能的测定:方法学的批判性评价
Pediatr Nephrol. 2001 Apr;16(4):374-82. doi: 10.1007/s004670000551.
8
Influence of preanalytic and analytic variables in canine and feline urine specific gravity measurement by refractometer.分析前和分析变量对犬猫尿液比重折射计测量的影响
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2020 Jan;32(1):36-43. doi: 10.1177/1040638719896785. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
9
[Comparative measurement of urine specific gravity: reagent strips, refractometry and hydrometry].[尿比重的比较测量:试剂条法、折射计法和比重计法]
Arch Argent Pediatr. 2010 Jun;108(3):234-8. doi: 10.1590/S0325-00752010000300009.
10
Urine specific gravity measurements: comparison of a new reagent strip method with existing methodologies, as applied to the water concentration/dilution tests.尿比重测量:一种新的试带法与现有方法在水浓缩/稀释试验中的比较。
Curr Med Res Opin. 1983;8(6):375-81. doi: 10.1185/03007998309111742.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparative Analysis of Hydration Status Among Urban and Rural Adults in Selangor, Malaysia.马来西亚雪兰莪州城乡成年人水合状态的比较分析。
Cureus. 2025 Jun 30;17(6):e87064. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87064. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
A protocol for the prospective study of urinary cadmium with risk of fracture, bone loss, and muscle loss.一项关于尿镉与骨折、骨质流失和肌肉流失风险的前瞻性研究方案。
JBMR Plus. 2024 Jan 4;8(2):ziad006. doi: 10.1093/jbmrpl/ziad006. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
[Consensus recommendations on the diagnosis and treatment of hyponatremia from the Austrian Society for Nephrology 2024].[奥地利肾脏病学会2024年低钠血症诊断与治疗共识建议]
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2024 Feb;136(Suppl 1):1-33. doi: 10.1007/s00508-024-02325-5. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
4
Evaluation of a urine dipstick protein to urine specific gravity ratio for the detection of proteinuria in dogs and cats.评估尿液干化学试带蛋白与尿比重比值在犬猫蛋白尿检测中的应用。
J Vet Intern Med. 2024 Mar-Apr;38(2):1060-1067. doi: 10.1111/jvim.17001. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
5
Comparison of different methods used in drugs of abuse for sample validity testing including pH methods, specific gravity methods, TECO™ Drug Adulteration Test Strip and oxidant assay.用于药物滥用样本有效性检测的不同方法的比较,包括pH值法、比重法、TECO™药物掺假检测试纸条和氧化剂检测法。
Adv Lab Med. 2021 Jun 4;2(4):550-566. doi: 10.1515/almed-2021-0026. eCollection 2021 Nov.
6
How to Monitor Hydration Status and Urine Dilution in Patients with Nephrolithiasis.如何监测肾结石患者的液体摄入状态和尿液稀释度。
Nutrients. 2023 Mar 28;15(7):1642. doi: 10.3390/nu15071642.
7
The association between hydration status and body composition in healthy children and adolescents.水合状态与健康儿童和青少年身体成分的关系。
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Apr 4;36(5):470-477. doi: 10.1515/jpem-2022-0462. Print 2023 May 25.
8
Hydration status during commercial saturation diving measured by bioimpedance and urine specific gravity.通过生物电阻抗和尿比重测量商业饱和潜水期间的水合状态。
Front Physiol. 2022 Sep 29;13:971757. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.971757. eCollection 2022.
9
Determination of major and trace element variability in healthy human urine by ICP-QMS and specific gravity normalisation.采用电感耦合等离子体质谱法(ICP-QMS)及比重归一化法测定健康人尿液中常量和微量元素的变异性。
RSC Adv. 2018 Nov 13;8(66):38022-38035. doi: 10.1039/c8ra06794e. eCollection 2018 Nov 7.
10
Automated urine sediment analyzers underestimate the severity of hematuria in glomerular diseases.自动化尿沉渣分析仪低估了肾小球疾病血尿的严重程度。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 25;11(1):20981. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00457-6.

本文引用的文献

1
The relationship between urine osmolality and specific gravity.尿渗透压与比重之间的关系。
Am J Med Sci. 2002 Jan;323(1):39-42. doi: 10.1097/00000441-200201000-00007.
2
Dipstick measurements of urine specific gravity are unreliable.尿比重的试条测量结果不可靠。
Arch Dis Child. 2001 Aug;85(2):155-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.85.2.155.
3
Measurement of urinary concentration: a critical appraisal of methodologies.尿浓缩功能的测定:方法学的批判性评价
Pediatr Nephrol. 2001 Apr;16(4):374-82. doi: 10.1007/s004670000551.
4
Urine specific gravity measurements: comparison of a new reagent strip method with existing methodologies, as applied to the water concentration/dilution tests.尿比重测量:一种新的试带法与现有方法在水浓缩/稀释试验中的比较。
Curr Med Res Opin. 1983;8(6):375-81. doi: 10.1185/03007998309111742.
5
Estimation of urine specific gravity and osmolality using a simple reagent strip.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 Oct 23;285(6349):1168. doi: 10.1136/bmj.285.6349.1168.
6
Determining specific gravity of urine with reagent sticks.
Clin Chem. 1984 Apr;30(4):582-3.
7
Study of urinary specific gravity by reagent strip method.用试带法检测尿比重的研究。
Tokai J Exp Clin Med. 1983 Jul;8(3):247-55.
8
Evaluation of ames Multistix-SG for urine specific gravity versus refractometer specific gravity.用艾姆斯多功能试纸条-SG检测尿比重与用折射仪检测尿比重的比较。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1983 Dec;80(6):871-3. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/80.6.871.
9
Further evaluation of the SG test strip for estimation of urinary osmolality.用于估算尿渗透压的SG试纸条的进一步评估。
J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1984 Jun;22(6):419-25. doi: 10.1515/cclm.1984.22.6.419.
10
[Evaluation of urinary density by AMES reagent strips and comparison to the density determined by refractometry and urinary osmolarity].
Clin Biochem. 1985 Apr;18(2):130-3. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9120(85)80095-3.