• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对任务集检索的情境控制。

Contextual control over task-set retrieval.

作者信息

Crump Matthew J C, Logan Gordon D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, 633 Wilson Hall, 111 21st Ave. South, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Nov;72(8):2047-53. doi: 10.3758/bf03196681.

DOI:10.3758/bf03196681
PMID:21097849
Abstract

Contextual cues signaling task likelihood or the likelihood of task repetition are known to modulate the size of switch costs. We follow up on the finding by Leboe, Wong, Crump, and Stobbe (2008) that location cues predictive of the proportion of switch or repeat trials modulate switch costs. Their design employed one cue per task, whereas our experiment employed two cues per task, which allowed separate assessment of modulations to the cue-repetition benefit, a measure of lower level cue-encoding processes, and to the task-alternation cost, a measure of higher level processes representing task-set information. We demonstrate that location information predictive of switch proportion modulates performance at the level of task-set representations. Furthermore, we demonstrate that contextual control occurs even when subjects are unaware of the associations between context and switch likelihood. We discuss the notion that contextual information provides rapid, unconscious control over the extent to which prior task-set representations are retrieved in the service of guiding online performance.

摘要

已知指示任务可能性或任务重复可能性的情境线索会调节切换成本的大小。我们对勒博、王、克伦普和斯托贝(2008年)的研究发现进行了跟进,即预测切换或重复试验比例的位置线索会调节切换成本。他们的设计每个任务使用一个线索,而我们的实验每个任务使用两个线索,这使得能够分别评估对线索重复益处(一种较低水平线索编码过程的度量)和任务交替成本(一种代表任务集信息的较高水平过程的度量)的调节。我们证明,预测切换比例的位置信息会在任务集表征水平上调节表现。此外,我们证明即使受试者没有意识到情境与切换可能性之间的关联,情境控制也会发生。我们讨论了这样一种观点,即情境信息会对为指导在线表现而检索先前任务集表征的程度提供快速、无意识的控制。

相似文献

1
Contextual control over task-set retrieval.对任务集检索的情境控制。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Nov;72(8):2047-53. doi: 10.3758/bf03196681.
2
Priming cue encoding by manipulating transition frequency in explicitly cued task switching.在明确提示的任务切换中通过操纵转换频率进行启动线索编码。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Feb;13(1):145-51. doi: 10.3758/bf03193826.
3
The influence of cue-task association and location on switch cost and alternating-switch cost.线索-任务关联和位置对切换成本及交替切换成本的影响。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2002 Mar;56(1):18-29. doi: 10.1037/h0087382.
4
Short cue presentations encourage advance task preparation: a recipe to diminish the residual switch cost.简短提示呈现促进任务提前准备:一种减少残余切换成本的方法。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Mar;33(2):342-56. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.342.
5
Task switching versus cue switching: using transition cuing to disentangle sequential effects in task-switching performance.任务切换与线索切换:运用转换线索来厘清任务切换表现中的序列效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Mar;33(2):370-8. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.370.
6
Eye movements, not hypercompatible mappings, are critical for eliminating the cost of task set reconfiguration.眼球运动,而非超兼容映射,对于消除任务集重新配置的代价至关重要。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Oct;13(5):923-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03194020.
7
Cue-switch costs in task-switching: cue priming or control processes?任务转换中的线索切换代价:线索启动还是控制过程?
Psychol Res. 2010 Sep;74(5):481-90. doi: 10.1007/s00426-009-0270-y.
8
What matters in the cued task-switching paradigm: tasks or cues?线索提示任务切换范式中重要的是什么:任务还是线索?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Oct;13(5):794-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03193999.
9
Modeling task switching without switching tasks: a short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance.在不切换任务的情况下模拟任务切换:对明确提示表现的短期启动解释。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2005 Aug;134(3):343-67. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.343.
10
On the minimization of task switch costs following long-term training.长期训练后任务切换成本的最小化
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Apr;71(3):503-14. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.3.503.

引用本文的文献

1
Binding of response-independent task rules.任务无关规则的结合。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Aug;31(4):1821-1832. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02465-9. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
2
Learning Cognitive Flexibility: Neural Substrates of Adapting Switch-Readiness to Time-varying Demands.学习认知灵活性:适应时变需求的转换准备状态的神经基础。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Feb 1;36(2):377-393. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02091.
3
Instructing item-specific switch probability: expectations modulate stimulus-action priming.指导项目特异性转换概率:期望调节刺激-动作启动。
Psychol Res. 2022 Oct;86(7):2195-2214. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01641-z. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
4
Grounding Adaptive Cognitive Control in the Intrinsic, Functional Brain Organization: An HD-EEG Resting State Investigation.基于大脑内在功能组织的适应性认知控制基础:一项高密度脑电图静息态研究
Brain Sci. 2021 Nov 15;11(11):1513. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11111513.
5
Appealing to the cognitive miser: Using demand avoidance to modulate cognitive flexibility in cued and voluntary task switching.诉诸认知吝啬鬼:使用需求回避调节提示和自愿任务转换中的认知灵活性。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021 Oct;47(10):1329-1347. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000942.
6
Disentangling the Roles of Cue Visibility and Knowledge in Adjusting Cognitive Control: A Preregistered Direct Replication of the Farooqui and Manly (2015) Study.解析线索可见性和知识在调整认知控制中的作用:对法鲁基和曼利(2015 年)研究的预先注册直接复制。
Psychol Sci. 2020 Apr;31(4):468-479. doi: 10.1177/0956797620904045. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
7
Item-specific priming of voluntary task switches.任务特异性启动对自愿任务转换的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Apr;46(4):434-441. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000725.
8
Neural Mechanisms of Strategic Adaptation in Attentional Flexibility.注意灵活性中策略性适应的神经机制。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 May;32(5):989-1008. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01541. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
9
Spontaneous Task Structure Formation Results in a Cost to Incidental Memory of Task Stimuli.自发任务结构形成会对任务刺激的附带记忆造成代价。
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 17;10:2833. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02833. eCollection 2019.
10
Declarative and procedural working memory updating processes are mutually facilitative.陈述性和程序性工作记忆更新过程相互促进。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 May;82(4):1858-1871. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01887-1.