• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氯菊酯洗发水与马拉硫磷洗液治疗头虱感染的比较。

Comparison of phenothrin shampoo and malathion lotion in the treatment of head louse infection.

作者信息

Kyle D R

机构信息

Central Birmingham Health Authority, Edgbaston.

出版信息

J R Soc Health. 1990 Apr;110(2):62-3. doi: 10.1177/146642409011000210.

DOI:10.1177/146642409011000210
PMID:2110262
Abstract

Eighty patients (age range 4-10 years) with head lice infection were recruited to the study. Forty patients were treated with a single application of 0.2% w/v phenothrin liquid shampoo and 40 with 0.2% w/v malathion lotion. Inspection of the patients one week later revealed that no live lice remained in either group, but that two patients had viable eggs in the malathion lotion group. Re-inspection four weeks after application revealed that five patients of the phenothrin shampoo group and seven of the malathion lotion group had viable eggs. Live lice were not seen to be present in either treatment group. The results indicate that both products are effective in the treatment of head lice infection and that the phenothrin shampoo would be a useful addition to the insecticides currently employed.

摘要

80名头虱感染患者(年龄范围4至10岁)被纳入该研究。40名患者单次使用0.2%(w/v)氯菊酯液体洗发水进行治疗,40名患者使用0.2%(w/v)马拉硫磷洗剂进行治疗。一周后对患者进行检查发现,两组均无活虱残留,但马拉硫磷洗剂组有两名患者有存活的虱卵。用药四周后再次检查发现,氯菊酯洗发水组有5名患者有存活的虱卵,马拉硫磷洗剂组有7名患者有存活的虱卵。两个治疗组均未见活虱。结果表明,两种产品对头虱感染均有效,且氯菊酯洗发水将是目前使用的杀虫剂的有益补充。

相似文献

1
Comparison of phenothrin shampoo and malathion lotion in the treatment of head louse infection.氯菊酯洗发水与马拉硫磷洗液治疗头虱感染的比较。
J R Soc Health. 1990 Apr;110(2):62-3. doi: 10.1177/146642409011000210.
2
Phenothrin lotion, the latest recruit in the battle against headlice: the results of two controlled comparative studies.苯醚菊酯洗剂,对抗头虱战斗中的最新成员:两项对照比较研究的结果
J R Soc Health. 1991 Apr;111(2):47-50. doi: 10.1177/146642409111100202.
3
A comparison of a single occasion treatment of head louse infestation with phenothrin liquid shampoo or a carbaryl lotion.使用氯菊酯液体洗发水或西维因洗剂单次治疗头虱感染的比较。
Curr Med Res Opin. 1991;12(7):466-70. doi: 10.1185/03007999109111518.
4
A comparison of two insecticidal shampoos in the treatment of head louse infection.
J R Soc Health. 1991 Jun;111(3):90-1. doi: 10.1177/146642409111100302.
5
[Treatment of pediculosis capitis in children with permethrin 1% shampoo or lotion].[用1%氯菊酯洗发水或洗剂治疗儿童头虱病]
Bol Chil Parasitol. 1994 Jul-Dec;49(3-4):49-52.
6
Pediculosis capitis: why prefer a solution to shampoo or spray?头虱病:为何更青睐溶液而非洗发水或喷雾?
Pediatr Dermatol. 1988 Nov;5(4):273-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.1988.tb00903.x.
7
Controlled study of malathion and d-phenothrin lotions for Pediculus humanus var capitis-infested schoolchildren.马拉硫磷和右旋苯醚菊酯洗剂用于头虱感染学童的对照研究。
Lancet. 1994;344(8939-8940):1724-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)92884-3.
8
Comparative efficacy of treatments for pediculosis capitis infestations.头虱感染治疗方法的比较疗效
Arch Dermatol. 1986 Mar;122(3):267-71.
9
Widespread insecticide resistance in head lice to the over-the-counter pediculocides in England, and the emergence of carbaryl resistance.英国头虱对非处方灭虱药产生广泛抗药性,且西维因抗药性出现。
Br J Dermatol. 2002 Jan;146(1):88-93. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2002.04473.x.
10
Oral ivermectin versus malathion lotion for difficult-to-treat head lice.口服伊维菌素与马拉硫磷洗剂治疗难治性头虱。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 11;362(10):896-905. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0905471.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review of clinical efficacy of topical treatments for head lice.头虱局部治疗临床疗效的系统评价
BMJ. 1995 Sep 2;311(7005):604-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7005.604.