Vander Stichele R H, Dezeure E M, Bogaert M G
Heymans Institute of Pharmacology, University of Ghent, Belgium.
BMJ. 1995 Sep 2;311(7005):604-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7005.604.
To collect and evaluate all trials on clinical efficacy of topical treatments for head lice.
Systematic review of randomised trials identified from following data sources: Medline, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Science Citation Index, letters to key authors and companies, and hand search of journals.
Trials in schools or communities.
Patients infested with lice.
Cure rate (absence of live lice and viable nits) on day 14 after treatment.
Total of 28 trials were identified and evaluated according to eight general and 18 lice specific criteria. Of the 14 trials rated as having low to moderate risk of bias, seven were selected as they used the main outcome measure. These seven trials described 21 evaluations of eight different compounds and placebo (all but two evaluations were of single applications). Only permethrin 1% creme rinse showed efficacy in more than two studies with the lower 95% confidence limit of cure rate above 90%.
Only for permethrin has sufficient evidence been published to show efficacy. Less expensive treatments such as malathion and carbaryl need more evidence of efficacy. Lindane and the natural pyrethrines are not sufficiently effective to justify their use.
收集并评估所有关于头虱局部治疗临床疗效的试验。
对从以下数据源中识别出的随机试验进行系统评价:医学文献数据库(Medline)、国际药学文摘、科学引文索引、给主要作者和公司的信函,以及对手检期刊的检索。
学校或社区中的试验。
感染虱子的患者。
治疗后第14天的治愈率(无活虱和有活力的虱卵)。
共识别出28项试验,并根据8项一般标准和18项虱子特异性标准进行评估。在14项被评为偏倚风险低至中度的试验中,7项因使用主要观察指标而被选中。这7项试验描述了对8种不同化合物和安慰剂的21次评估(除两项评估外均为单次应用)。只有1%氯菊酯乳膏剂在两项以上研究中显示出疗效,治愈率的95%置信区间下限高于90%。
仅氯菊酯有足够的已发表证据表明其疗效。马拉硫磷和西维因等较便宜的治疗方法需要更多疗效证据。林丹和天然除虫菊酯的效果不足以证明其使用的合理性。