• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Systematic review of clinical efficacy of topical treatments for head lice.头虱局部治疗临床疗效的系统评价
BMJ. 1995 Sep 2;311(7005):604-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7005.604.
2
Interventions for treating head lice.治疗头虱的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(2):CD001165. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001165.
3
Interventions for treating headlice.治疗头虱的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(3):CD001165. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001165.
4
WITHDRAWN: Interventions for treating headlice.撤回:治疗头虱的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;2001(4):CD001165. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001165.pub2.
5
Interventions for treating headlice.治疗头虱的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD001165. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001165.
6
Evidence for double resistance to permethrin and malathion in head lice.头虱对氯菊酯和马拉硫磷双重耐药的证据。
Br J Dermatol. 1999 Sep;141(3):508-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1999.03046.x.
7
Comparative study of permethrin 1% creme rinse and lindane shampoo for the treatment of head lice.1%氯菊酯乳膏剂和林丹香波治疗头虱的对比研究
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1987 Mar;6(3):252-5. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198703000-00008.
8
A randomized, investigator-blinded, time-ranging study of the comparative efficacy of 0.5% malathion gel versus Ovide Lotion (0.5% malathion) or Nix Crème Rinse (1% permethrin) used as labeled, for the treatment of head lice.一项随机、研究者设盲、有时间跨度的研究,比较按标签说明使用的0.5%马拉硫磷凝胶与Ovide洗液(0.5%马拉硫磷)或Nix洗发液(1%氯菊酯)治疗头虱的疗效。
Pediatr Dermatol. 2007 Jul-Aug;24(4):405-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2007.00460.x.
9
Pediculus humanus capitis in schoolchildren.学童中的头虱
Lancet. 1995 Mar 18;345(8951):731; author reply 731-2.
10
Head lice and the use of spinosad.头虱和 spinosad 的使用。
Clin Ther. 2012 Jan;34(1):14-23. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.11.026. Epub 2011 Dec 16.

引用本文的文献

1
An analysis of data sources and study registries used in systematic reviews.对系统评价中使用的数据来源和研究注册的分析。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2022 Dec;19(6):450-457. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12614. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
2
Physically Acting Treatments for Head Lice-Can We Still Claim They Are 'Resistance Proof'?用于治疗头虱的物理治疗方法——我们还能宣称它们“防抗药性”吗?
Pharmaceutics. 2022 Nov 10;14(11):2430. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14112430.
3
Clay Nanotube Immobilization on Animal Hair for Sustained Anti-Lice Protection.用于持续防虱保护的动物毛发上的粘土纳米管固定化
Pharmaceutics. 2021 Sep 15;13(9):1477. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13091477.
4
Comparative efficacy and safety of interventions for treating head lice: a protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.干预治疗头虱的疗效和安全性比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2021 May 10;5(1):e001129. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001129. eCollection 2021.
5
International recommendations for an effective control of head louse infestations.有效控制头虱感染的国际建议。
Int J Dermatol. 2021 Mar;60(3):272-280. doi: 10.1111/ijd.15096. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
6
Comparative efficacy of three pediculicides to treat head lice infestation in primary school girls: a randomised controlled assessor blind trial in rural Iran.三种灭虱剂治疗小学女生头虱感染的疗效比较:伊朗农村地区的一项随机对照评估者盲法试验
BMC Dermatol. 2019 Sep 12;19(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12895-019-0093-5.
7
Management and Treatment of Human Lice.人类虱子的管理与治疗
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:8962685. doi: 10.1155/2016/8962685. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
8
Ex vivo effectiveness of French over-the-counter products against head lice (Pediculus humanus capitis De Geer, 1778).法国非处方产品对头虱(人头虱,德吉尔,1778年)的体外有效性
Parasitol Res. 2015 May;114(5):1779-92. doi: 10.1007/s00436-015-4363-9. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
9
Comparison of phenothrin mousse, phenothrin lotion, and wet-combing for treatment of head louse infestation in the UK: a pragmatic randomised, controlled, assessor blind trial.英国氯菊酯摩丝、氯菊酯洗剂和湿梳法治疗头虱感染的比较:一项实用随机对照评估者盲法试验
F1000Res. 2014 Jul 10;3:158. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.2026.1. eCollection 2014.
10
Designing randomized-controlled trials to improve head-louse treatment: systematic review using a vignette-based method.设计随机对照试验以改进头虱治疗:基于情景描述的系统评价方法。
J Invest Dermatol. 2014 Mar;134(3):628-634. doi: 10.1038/jid.2013.414. Epub 2013 Oct 11.

本文引用的文献

1
[Controlling head lice].[控制头虱]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1950 Sep 9;94(36):2640-4.
2
Insecticides against headlice in Glasgow.格拉斯哥用于防治头虱的杀虫剂
J R Soc Health. 1993 Aug;113(4):181-3. doi: 10.1177/146642409311300406.
3
Synergized pyrethrin mousse, a new approach to head lice eradication: efficacy in field and laboratory studies.增效除虫菊酯摩丝,一种根除头虱的新方法:现场和实验室研究中的疗效
Clin Ther. 1994 Jan-Feb;16(1):57-64.
4
Rationale for systematic reviews.系统评价的基本原理。
BMJ. 1994 Sep 3;309(6954):597-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6954.597.
5
Controlled study of malathion and d-phenothrin lotions for Pediculus humanus var capitis-infested schoolchildren.马拉硫磷和右旋苯醚菊酯洗剂用于头虱感染学童的对照研究。
Lancet. 1994;344(8939-8940):1724-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)92884-3.
6
A comparative study of seven pediculicides and their packaged nit removal combs.七种灭虱剂及其配套去虱梳的比较研究。
J Pediatr Health Care. 1993 Mar-Apr;7(2):55-60. doi: 10.1016/0891-5245(93)90074-r.
7
A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial.一种评估随机对照试验质量的方法。
Control Clin Trials. 1981 May;2(1):31-49. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(81)90056-8.
8
Malathion for treatment of Pediculus humanus var capitis infestation.马拉硫磷治疗头虱感染
JAMA. 1982 Jun 11;247(22):3103-5.
9
Clinical and laboratory trial employing carbaryl against the human head-louse, Pediculus humanus capitis (de Geer).使用西维因防治人头虱(德吉尔人头虱)的临床和实验室试验。
Clin Exp Dermatol. 1981 Nov;6(6):605-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.1981.tb02364.x.
10
Efficacy of malathion and synergised bioallethrine in the treatment of head louse, Pediculus humanus ssp. capitis, infestations.马拉硫磷与增效生物丙烯菊酯治疗头虱(人头虱头亚种)感染的疗效
Acta Leiden. 1984;52:53-9.

头虱局部治疗临床疗效的系统评价

Systematic review of clinical efficacy of topical treatments for head lice.

作者信息

Vander Stichele R H, Dezeure E M, Bogaert M G

机构信息

Heymans Institute of Pharmacology, University of Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

BMJ. 1995 Sep 2;311(7005):604-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7005.604.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.311.7005.604
PMID:7545045
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2550649/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To collect and evaluate all trials on clinical efficacy of topical treatments for head lice.

DESIGN

Systematic review of randomised trials identified from following data sources: Medline, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Science Citation Index, letters to key authors and companies, and hand search of journals.

SETTING

Trials in schools or communities.

SUBJECTS

Patients infested with lice.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Cure rate (absence of live lice and viable nits) on day 14 after treatment.

RESULTS

Total of 28 trials were identified and evaluated according to eight general and 18 lice specific criteria. Of the 14 trials rated as having low to moderate risk of bias, seven were selected as they used the main outcome measure. These seven trials described 21 evaluations of eight different compounds and placebo (all but two evaluations were of single applications). Only permethrin 1% creme rinse showed efficacy in more than two studies with the lower 95% confidence limit of cure rate above 90%.

CONCLUSIONS

Only for permethrin has sufficient evidence been published to show efficacy. Less expensive treatments such as malathion and carbaryl need more evidence of efficacy. Lindane and the natural pyrethrines are not sufficiently effective to justify their use.

摘要

目的

收集并评估所有关于头虱局部治疗临床疗效的试验。

设计

对从以下数据源中识别出的随机试验进行系统评价:医学文献数据库(Medline)、国际药学文摘、科学引文索引、给主要作者和公司的信函,以及对手检期刊的检索。

地点

学校或社区中的试验。

研究对象

感染虱子的患者。

主要观察指标

治疗后第14天的治愈率(无活虱和有活力的虱卵)。

结果

共识别出28项试验,并根据8项一般标准和18项虱子特异性标准进行评估。在14项被评为偏倚风险低至中度的试验中,7项因使用主要观察指标而被选中。这7项试验描述了对8种不同化合物和安慰剂的21次评估(除两项评估外均为单次应用)。只有1%氯菊酯乳膏剂在两项以上研究中显示出疗效,治愈率的95%置信区间下限高于90%。

结论

仅氯菊酯有足够的已发表证据表明其疗效。马拉硫磷和西维因等较便宜的治疗方法需要更多疗效证据。林丹和天然除虫菊酯的效果不足以证明其使用的合理性。